The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chakravarti, D., Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151869 · Cited by 7,141
The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework
Kaplan, S. (1995) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 · Cited by 6,923
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176 · Cited by 5,678
The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992) · Cited by 5,221
The “new environmental paradigm”
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978) · The Journal of Environmental Education · doi:10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875 · Cited by 2,833
A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy.
Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.638 · Cited by 1,883
Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment
Gagnon Thompson, S. C., & Barton, M. A. (1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80168-9 · Cited by 1,163
THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM: 5 PROPOSED MEASURING INSTRUMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS
Dunlap, R. E., & Liere, K. D. V. (1978) · Cited by 1,141
Bergman, E. F., & Appleton, J. (1978) · Geographical Review · doi:10.2307/213516 · Cited by 1,065
Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. A. (2003) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1078/1618-8667-00019 · Cited by 969
Cited by
The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis
Hawcroft, L. J., & Milfont, T. L. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.003 · Cited by 768
The role of urban green space for human well-being
Bertram, C., & Rehdanz, K. (2015) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.013 · Cited by 503
Qiu, L., Lindberg, S., & Nielsen, A. B. (2013) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.007 · Cited by 296
Rupprecht, C. D. D., & Byrne, J. A. (2014) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2014.09.002 · Cited by 280
Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents
Hofmann, M., Westermann, J. R., Kowarik, I., & van der Meer, E. (2012) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.001 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Bjerke, T., Østdahl, T., Thrane, C., & Strumse, E.
- Venue
- Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-44
- ISSN
- 1610-8167 (ISSN-L)
- 1618-8667
- OpenAlex
- W2038800220
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.006
- The paper
- Bjerke, T., Østdahl, T., Thrane, C., & Strumse, E. (2006). Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
