Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,019

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States

Nowak, David J., Crane, Daniel E., Stevens, Jack C.·2006·Urban Forestry & Urban Greening

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.007

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Baldocchi, 1988, A multi-layer model for estimating sulfur dioxide deposition to a deciduous oak forest canopy, Atmospheric Environment, 22, 869, 10.1016/0004-6981(88)90264-8 · DOI
  2. Baldocchi, 1987, A canopy stomatal resistance model for gaseous deposition to vegetated surfaces, Atmospheric Environment, 21, 91, 10.1016/0004-6981(87)90274-5 · DOI
  3. Bidwell, 1972, Carbon monoxide uptake and metabolism by leaves, Canadian Journal of Botany, 50, 1435, 10.1139/b72-174 · DOI
  4. Cardelino, 1990, Natural hydrocarbons, urbanization, and urban ozone, Journal of Geophysical Research, 95, 13,971, 10.1029/JD095iD09p13971 · DOI
  5. Chameides, 1988, The role of biogenic hydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog: Atlanta as a case study, Science, 241, 1473, 10.1126/science.3420404 · DOI
  6. Colbeck, 1985, Dry deposition of ozone: some measurements of deposition velocity and of vertical profiles to 100 metres, Atmospheric Environment, 19, 1807, 10.1016/0004-6981(85)90007-1 · DOI
  7. Dwyer, J.F., Nowak, D.J., Noble, M.H., Sisinni, S.M., 2000. Assessing our nation's urban forests: connecting people with ecosystems in the 21st century. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-460, Portland, OR. · DOI
  8. Hosker, 1982, Review: atmospheric deposition and plant assimilation of gases and particles, Atmospheric Environment, 16, 889, 10.1016/0004-6981(82)90175-5 · DOI
  9. Lovett, 1994, Atmospheric deposition of nutrients and pollutants in North America: an ecological perspective, Ecological Applications, 4, 629, 10.2307/1941997 · DOI
  10. Nowak, 1996, Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover, Landscape and Urban Planning, 36, 49, 10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00324-6 · DOI
  11. Nowak, 2000, A modeling study of the impact of urban trees on ozone, Atmospheric Environment, 34, 1610, 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00394-5 · DOI
  12. Nowak, 2001, Assessing the US urban forest resource, Journal of Forestry, 99, 37, 10.1093/jof/99.3.37 · DOI
  13. Pederson, 1995, California ozone deposition experiment: methods, results, and opportunities, Atmospheric Environment, 29, 3115, 10.1016/1352-2310(95)00136-M · DOI
  14. Taha, 1996, Modeling impacts of increased urban vegetation on ozone air quality in the South Coast Air Basin, Atmospheric Environment, 30, 3423, 10.1016/1352-2310(96)00035-0 · DOI
  15. Wesely, 1989, Parameterization for surface resistance to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models, Atmospheric Environment, 23, 1293, 10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Nowak, D. J., Crane, D. E., & Stevens, J. C.
Venue
Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
4
Issue
3-4
Pages
115-123
ISSN
1618-8667
Cited by
2,019
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.