Cited by 233Urban Green Space and HealthAir Quality and Health ImpactsEnvironmental Justice and Health Disparities

Surrounding Greenness and Exposure to Air Pollution During Pregnancy: An Analysis of Personal Monitoring Data

Open access
Dadvand, Payam, de Nazelle, Audrey, Triguero-Mas, Margarita, Schembari, Anna, Cirach, Marta, Amoly, Elmira, Figueras, Francesc, Basagaña, Xavier +2 more·2012·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

Background: Green spaces are reported to improve health status, including beneficial effects on pregnancy outcomes. Despite the suggestions of air pollution–related health benefits of green spaces, there is no available evidence on the impact of greenness on personal exposure to air pollution. Objectives: We investigated the association between surrounding greenness and personal exposure to air pollution among pregnant women and to explore the potential mechanisms, if any, behind this association. Methods: In total, 65 rounds of sampling were carried out for 54 pregnant women who resided in Barcelona during 2008–2009. Each round consisted of a 2-day measurement of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 μm (PM2.5) and a 1-week measurement of nitric oxides collected simultaneously at both the personal and microenvironmental levels. The study participants were also asked to fill out a time–microenvironment–activity diary during the sampling period. We used satellite retrievals to determine the surrounding greenness as the average of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) in a buffer of 100 m around each maternal residential address. We estimated the impact of surrounding greenness on personal exposure levels, home-outdoor and home-indoor pollutant levels, and maternal time-activity. Results: Higher residential surrounding greenness was associated with lower personal, home-indoor, and home-outdoor PM2.5 levels, and more time spent at home-outdoor. Conclusions: We found lower levels of personal exposure to air pollution among pregnant women residing in greener areas. This finding may be partly explained by lower home-indoor pollutant levels and more time spent in less polluted home-outdoor environment by pregnant women in greener areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.1104609

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pregnant women residing in greener areas in Barcelona, Spain, have lower levels of personal exposure to PM2.5 and nitric oxides.

    “Specific to prenatal exposure, Dadvand et al. [207] demonstrated lower levels of personal exposure to PM2.5 and nitric oxides among pregnant women residing in greener areas in Barcelona, Spain.”

    From Air pollution and children’s health—a review of adverse effects associated with prenatal exposure from fine to ultrafine particulate matter (2021) · cites this paper as [207]

    The Conclusions report lower average personal PM2.5 exposure with higher residential greenness among 54 pregnant women in Barcelona. The Discussion says the similar association for nitric oxides (NOx) was only an indication and did not attain statistical significance, so the claim overstates that part of the finding. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Akbari H 2002 Shade trees reduce building energy use and CO2 emissions from power plants. Environ Pollut 116(suppl 1) S119 S126 11833899
  2. Claudio L 2011 Planting healthier indoor air. Environ Health Perspect 119 A426 A427 22069776 PMC3230460
  3. Cohen AJ Anderson HR Ostro B Pandey KD Krzyzanowski M Künzli N 2005 The global burden of disease due to outdoor air pollution. J Toxicol Environ Health A 68 13–14 1301 1307 16024504
  4. Dadvand P de Nazelle A Figueras F Basagaña X Su J Amoly E 2011 Green space, health inequality, and pregnancy. Environ Int 40 110 105 21824657
  5. Domínguez-Berjón MF Borrell C Cano-Serral G Esnaola S Nolasco A Pasarín MI 2008 Construcción de un índice de privación a partir de datos censales en grandes ciudades españolas (Proyecto MEDEA). Gac Sanit 22 3 179 187 18579042
  6. Donovan GH Michael YL Butry DT Sullivan AD Chase JM 2011 Urban trees and the risk of poor birth outcomes. Health Place 17 1 390 393 21106432
  7. Ellaway A Macintyre S Bonnefoy X 2005 Graffiti, greenery, and obesity in adults: secondary analysis of European cross-sectional survey. BMJ 331 7517 611 612 16113034 PMC1215553
  8. Figueras F Meler E Iraola A Eixarch E Coll O Figueras J 2008 Customized birthweight standards for a Spanish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 136 1 20 24 17287065
  9. Fuller RA Gaston KJ 2009 The scaling of green space coverage in European cities. Biol Lett 5 3 352 355 19324636 PMC2679924
  10. Givoni B 1991 Impact of planted areas on urban environmental quality: a review. Atmos Environ Part B Urban Atmos 25 3 289 299
  11. Grimm NB Faeth SH Golubiewski NE Redman CL Wu J Bai X 2008 Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319 5864 756 760 18258902
  12. Hänninen OO Alm S Katsouyanni K Künzli N Maroni M Nieuwenhuijsen MJ 2004 The EXPOLIS study: implications for exposure research and environmental policy in Europe. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 14 6 440 456 15026774
  13. Lee AC Maheswaran R 2010 The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. J Public Health (Oxf) 33 2 212 222 20833671
  14. Maas J Van Dillen SME Verheij RA Groenewegen PP 2009a Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health Place 15 2 586 595 19022699
  15. Maas J Verheij RA de Vries S Spreeuwenberg P Schellevis FG Groenewegen PP 2009b Morbidity is related to a green living environment. J Epidemiol Community Health 63 12 967 973 19833605
  16. Shah PS Balkhair T, Knowledge Synthesis Group on behalf of the Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births. 2011 Air pollution and birth outcomes: a systematic review. Environ Int 37 2 498 516 21112090
  17. Su JG Jerrett M Beckerman B Wilhelm M Ghosh JK Ritz B 2009 Predicting traffic-related air pollution in Los Angeles using a distance decay regression selection strategy. Environ Res 109 6 657 670 19540476 PMC3656661
  18. Su JG Jerrett M de Nazelle A Wolch J 2011 Does exposure to air pollution in urban parks have socioeconomic, racial, or ethnic gradients? Environ Res 111 3 319 328 21292252
  19. Tzoulas K Korpela K Venn S Yli-Pelkonen V Kazmierczak A Niemela J 2007 Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: A literature review. Landsc Urban Plan 81 3 167 178
  20. van Roosbroeck S Wichmann J Janssen NA Hoek G van Wijnen JH Lebret E 2006 Long-term personal exposure to traffic-related air pollution among school children, a validation study. Sci Total Environ 368 2–3 565 573 16650461
  21. Vrijheid M Martinez D Manzanares S Dadvand P Schembari A Rankin J 2011 Ambient air pollution and risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect 119 598 606 21131253 PMC3094408

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dadvand, P., de Nazelle, A., Triguero-Mas, M., Schembari, A., Cirach, M., Amoly, E., Figueras, F., Basagaña, X., Ostro, B., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M.
Affiliations
  • Center for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (ES)
  • Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES)
Corresponding author
Dadvand, Payam
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2012-05-30
Volume
120
Issue
9
Pages
1286-1290
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W2049214209
Cited by
233
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Keywords
air pollution exposure, pregnancy, particulate matter PM2.5, nitric oxide, indoor air pollution, outdoor air pollution, time-activity patterns, NDVI, green spaces, maternal exposure, Barcelona
MeSH terms
Adult, Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, Cities, Climate, Environment, Environmental Exposure, Environmental Monitoring, Female, Humans, Nitrogen Oxides, Seasons, Spain, Particulate Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review