Decision making in urban forestry by using approval voting and multicriteria approval method (case study: Zvezdarska forest, Belgrade, Serbia)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This approach has been applied in a number of climate change-related fields, including energy and infrastructure planning, industry, land use, and more.
“This approach has been applied in a number of climate change-related fields, including energy and infrastructure planning [38,325,525,635,732,856], industry [122,334], land use [462,809], and more [127,317,539,761].”
From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [462]
Cites
Ecosystem services and valuation of urban forests in China
Jim, C. Y., & Chen, W. Y. (2009) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2009.03.003 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
The Encyclopedia of public choice
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-5661 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Sheppard, S. R. J., & Meitner, M. J. (2004) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.032 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
A decade of urban forestry in Europe
Konijnendijk, C. C. (2003) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/s1389-9341(03)00023-6 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Ananda, J., & Herath, G. (2003) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/s1389-9341(02)00043-6 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Projected Urban Growth (2000–2050) and Its Estimated Impact on the US Forest Resource
Nowak, D. J., & Walton, J. T. (2005) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1093/jof/103.8.383 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Public preferences for structural attributes of forests: Towards a pan-European perspective
Edwards, D., Jay, M., Jensen, F. S., et al. (2012) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.006 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Srdjević, B. (2006) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.08.001 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Liu, J., Ouyang, Z., & Miao, H. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.007 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Nordström, E., Eriksson, L. O., & Öhman, K. (2010) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.07.006 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
An approach to public participation in strategic forest management planning
Kangas, J. (1994) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/0378-1127(94)90076-0 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Pinto‐Correia, T., Gustavsson, R., & Pirnat, J. (2006) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-005-4720-7 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
A formal model for consensus and negotiation in environmental management
Regan, H. M., Colyvan, M., & Markovchick, L. (2005) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.09.004 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Social choice theory and its applications in sustainable forest management—a review
Kangas, A. S., Laukkanen, S., & Kangas, J. (2005) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.02.004 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Stakeholder perspectives about proper participation for Regional Forest Programmes in Finland
Kangas, A. S., Saarinen, N., Saarikoski, H., et al. (2009) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2009.10.006 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Tomićević, J., Shannon, M. A., & Milovanović, M. (2009) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2009.09.006 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Laukkanen, S., Kangas, A. S., & Kangas, J. (2002) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1006/jema.2001.0511 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Choice of stakeholder groups and members in multicriteria decision models
Harrison, S., & Qureshi, M. E. (2000) · Natural Resources Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2000.tb00925.x · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Dı́az-Balteiro, L., González‐Pachón, J., & Romero, C. (2009) · Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1080/02827580802687440 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Stakeholders’ perceptions of forestry in rural areas—Two case studies in Ireland
Dhubháin, Á. N., Fléchard, M.-C., Moloney, R., et al. (2008) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.09.003 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Reviewing eight years of Urban Forestry & Urban Greening: Taking stock, looking ahead
Bentsen, P., Lindholst, A. C., & Konijnendijk, C. C. (2010) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2010.06.003 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Kangas, J., Store, R., & Kangas, A. S. (2004) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2003.12.001 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Visualization and landscape laboratories in planning, design and management of urban woodlands
Tyrväinen, L., Gustavsson, R., Konijnendijk, C. C., et al. (2005) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2004.12.005 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Voting methods in strategic forest planning — Experiences from Metsähallitus
Hiltunen, V., Kangas, J., & Pykäläinen, J. (2007) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2007.06.002 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Approach of Decision Making Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Urban Landscape Management
Srdjević, Z., Lakićević, M., & Srdjević, B. (2012) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-012-9990-7 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Multicriteria approval: application of approval voting concepts to MCDM problems
Fraser, N. M., & Hauge, J. W. (1998) · Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1360(199809)7:5 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Urban forestry—Linking naturalness and amenity: The case of Ljubljana, Slovenia
Hladnik, D., & Pirnat, J. (2011) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2011.02.002 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Kangas, J., & Kangas, A. S. (2003) · Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis · doi:10.1002/mcda.344 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Ratsimbazafy, L. C. (2012) · Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment · doi:10.5897/jene11.123 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Declared-strategy voting: an instrument for group decision-making
Cranor, L. F., & Cytron, R. K. (1996) · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Forest stakeholders' value preferences in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania
Kijazi, M. H., & Kant, S. (2010) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.02.007 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Assessment of urban forestry research and research needs in Nordic and Baltic countries
Konijnendijk, C. C., Nielsen, A. B., Schipperijn, J., et al. (2007) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2007.08.001 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Evaluation of the multicriteria approval method for timber-harvesting group decision support
Laukkanen, S., Palander, T., Kangas, J., et al. (2005) · Silva Fennica · doi:10.14214/sf.387 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
A STUDY OF STAKEHOLDERS' PERSPECTIVES ON MULTI-FUNCTIONAL FORESTS IN EUROPE
Nijnik, M., Nijnik, A., Lundin, L., et al. (2010) · Forests Trees and Livelihoods · doi:10.1080/14728028.2010.9752677 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Participatory urban forestry in Nepal: Gaps and ways forward
Lamichhane, D., & Thapa, H. B. (2011) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2011.07.008 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Multi-criteria analysis for locating new urban forests: An example from Isparta, Turkey
Gül, A., Gezer, A., & Kane, B. C. P. (2006) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2006.05.003 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Peiter, C. C., Bôas, R. C. V., & Shinya, W. M. (2000) · Natural Resources Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2000.tb00924.x · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Urban Forestry in Challenging Environments
Yang, J. (2012) · Urban forestry & urban greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2012.03.001 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Developing decision support in participatory strategic forest planning in Metsähallitus
Hiltunen, V. (2012) · Dissertationes Forestales · doi:10.14214/df.141 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tackling climate change with machine learning
Rolnick, D., Donti, P. L., Kaack, L. H., Kochanski, K., Lacoste, A., Sankaran, K., Ross, A. S., Milojevic-Dupont, N., Jaques, N., Waldman-Brown, A., et al. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3485128 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lakicevic, M., Srdjevic, Z., Srdjevic, B., & Zlatic, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Belgrade (RS)
- ORCID
- Zlatic, Miodrag
- Venue
- Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 114-120
- ISSN
- 1610-8167 (ISSN-L)
- 1618-8667
- OpenAlex
- W2055835857
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Urban forestry & urban greening (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja (174003)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies
- Keywords
- urban forest management, approval voting, social choice, stakeholder engagement, Belgrade
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review