Cited by 27Multi-Criteria Decision MakingForest Management and PolicyUrban Arborization and Environmental Studies

Decision making in urban forestry by using approval voting and multicriteria approval method (case study: Zvezdarska forest, Belgrade, Serbia)

Lakicevic, Milena, Srdjevic, Zorica, Srdjevic, Bojan, Zlatic, Miodrag·2014·Urban Forestry & Urban Greening

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.11.001

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This approach has been applied in a number of climate change-related fields, including energy and infrastructure planning, industry, land use, and more.

    “This approach has been applied in a number of climate change-related fields, including energy and infrastructure planning [38,325,525,635,732,856], industry [122,334], land use [462,809], and more [127,317,539,761].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [462]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lakicevic, M., Srdjevic, Z., Srdjevic, B., & Zlatic, M.
Affiliations
University of Belgrade (RS)
Venue
Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
114-120
ISSN
  • 1610-8167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1618-8667
OpenAlex
W2055835857
Cited by
27
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Urban forestry & urban greening (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja (174003)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies
Keywords
urban forest management, approval voting, social choice, stakeholder engagement, Belgrade

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review