Cited by 16Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research

Optimizing the placement of piezoelectric wafers on closed sections using a genetic algorithm–Towards application in structural health monitoring

Ismail, Zainab, Mustapha, Samir, Tarhini, Hussein·2021·Ultrasonics

Abstract

Sensor network design is essential to efficiently integrate Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems in aerospace, automotive, and civil structures. This study describes an optimization model for piezoelectric (PZT) wafer placement on curved structures and closed sections. The proposed approach relied on the transformation of any complex/closed surface regardless of the shape of its cross-section into a flat plate and imposed a set of boundary conditions to account for the wave propagation characteristics. Because the structure was continuous and the wave could propagate in every direction, for simplicity and without sacrificing accuracy, our model assumed that a pair of PZT elements communicated information in the two shortest directions. Thus, the concept of having two paths for each PZT couple was introduced to tackle this multidirectional behavior. The plate was then discretized into a set of control points that represented the structure geometry. The PZT couples covered the control points along the line of sight and in the neighborhood of their direct and indirect paths. The objective function was to maximize the number of covered points while minimizing the number of PZT wafers. The proposed model was solved using a genetic algorithm and was validated on circular and square sections. Sensors were spread on the circumference of the structure rather than mounting them in the form of rings or axial lines. The optimized PZT networks had high coverage that reached 99% in simulations. Notably, the optimized model improved the preliminary solution coverage by 14%. Experimental validation was performed on the circular section (pipe). The results demonstrated the proficiency of the developed model in distributing the PZT wafers on closed sections. The coverage was further evaluated by assessing if damaged areas on the pipe surface could be identified. Artificial damage was accurately located within 18 mm from the actual location. These results demonstrate that our model efficiently distributes PZT wafers on closed structures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.106523

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ismail, Z., Mustapha, S., & Tarhini, H.
Affiliations
American University of Beirut (LB)
Corresponding author
Mustapha, Samir
Venue
Ultrasonics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
116
Pages
106523
ISSN
0041-624X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3180941804
Cited by
16
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasonics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American University of Beirut
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Keywords
structural health monitoring, closed sections, curved structures, genetic algorithm optimization, sensor coverage, wave propagation, pipe damage detection, sensor network design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review