Effects of Transcranial Ultrasound and Intravenous Microbubbles on Blood Brain Barrier Permeability in a Large Animal Model
Abstract
We sought to determine whether transtemporal-applied 1-MHz ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction may be a safe method of transiently altering blood brain barrier (BBB) permeability for drug delivery in a large animal model. Endothelial cells are an integral component of the BBB but also prevent passage of potentially therapeutic drugs. Ultrasound-mediated destruction (UMD) of microbubbles has been shown to disrupt this barrier in small animals when ultrasound is delivered through bone windows. However, the effects of temporal bone attenuation and scattering in a large animal may limit the clinical application of such a technique. Twenty-four pigs were studied. One-MHz pulsed-wave ultrasound at 2.0 W/cm(2) (20% duty cycle) across the temporal bone was applied for 30 min after intravenous injections of either albumin-coated perfluorocarbon microbubble (PESDA, 8 pigs), lipid-encapsulated perfluorocarbon microbubbles (LEMB, 8 pigs) or ultrasound alone (8 pigs). BBB leak was quantified at 30 and 120 min after insonation using Evans blue. Serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in nine of the pigs (3 for each group) to quantify Gadolinium leak within the parenchyma. Peak negative pressures decreased ten-fold when ultrasound was transmitted across the pig temporal bone. Despite this, spectrophotometric analysis showed that both IV LEMB and PESDA combined with transtemporal ultrasound resulted in a significant increase in Evans blue extravasation across BBB of the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FUS-MB induces temporary BBB opening even in NHPs.
“A more localized transient disruption of BBB is accomplished by using magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound in combination with IV infusion of microbubbles (FUS-MB) (Fig. 4b), which induce temporary BBB opening even in NHPs [134–137].”
From Designing and optimizing AAV-mediated gene therapy for neurodegenerative diseases: from bench to bedside (2024) · cites this paper as [137]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 16 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Xie, F., Boska, M. D., Lof, J., Uberti, M. G., Tsutsui, J. M., & Porter, T. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Porter, Thomas R.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2028-2034
- ISSN
- 0301-5629 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983771172
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Genentech
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Keywords
- transcranial ultrasound, blood-brain barrier permeability, perfluorocarbon microbubbles, blood-brain barrier opening, Evans blue extravasation, gadolinium retention, pigs
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Capillary Permeability, Coloring Agents, Evans Blue, Feasibility Studies, Gadolinium, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sonication, Spectrophotometry, Drug Delivery Systems, Models, Animal, Sus scrofa, Microbubbles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review