Cited by 32Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating the Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of Three-Dimensional Ultrasound and Power Doppler Angiography (3D-PDA) for Assessment of Placental Volume and Vascularity in the Second Trimester of Pregnancy

Jones, Nia W., Raine-Fenning, Nick J., Mousa, Hatem A., Bradley, Eileen, Bugg, George J.·2011·Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3-D) power Doppler angiography (3-D-PDA) allows visualisation of Doppler signals within the placenta and their quantification is possible by the generation of vascular indices by the 4-D View software programme. This study aimed to investigate intra- and interobserver reproducibility of 3-D-PDA analysis of stored datasets at varying gestations with the ultimate goal being to develop a tool for predicting placental dysfunction. Women with an uncomplicated, viable singleton pregnancy were scanned at 12, 16 or 20 weeks gestational age groups. 3-D-PDA datasets acquired of the whole placenta were analysed using the VOCAL software processing tool. Each volume was analysed by three observers twice in the A plane. Intra- and interobserver reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland Altman plots. At each gestational age group, 20 low risk women were scanned resulting in 60 datasets in total. The ICC demonstrated a high level of measurement reliability at each gestation with intraobserver values >0.90 and interobserver values of >0.6 for the vascular indices. Bland Altman plots also showed high levels of agreement. Systematic bias was seen at 20 weeks in the vascular indices obtained by different observers. This study demonstrates that 3-D-PDA data can be measured reliably by different observers from stored datasets up to 18 weeks gestation. Measurements become less reliable as gestation advances with bias between observers evident at 20 weeks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.11.018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Bartlett, 2008, Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: Analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 31, 466, 10.1002/uog.5256 · DOI
  2. Bland, 1995, Comparing methods of measurement: Why plotting difference against standard method is misleading, Lancet, 346, 1085, 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91748-9 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bland, 1999, Measuring agreement in method comparison studies, Stat Methods Med Res, 8, 135, 10.1177/096228029900800204 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bland, 2003, Applying the right statistics: Analyses of measurement studies, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 22, 85, 10.1002/uog.122 · DOI
  5. Bujold, 2009, Reproducibility of first trimester three–dimensional placental measurements in the evaluation of early placental insufficiency, J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 31, 1144, 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34375-4 · DOI
  6. Campbell, 2007, Placental vasculature as visualized by 3-D power Doppler angiography and 3-D color Doppler imaging, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 30, 917, 10.1002/uog.5195 · DOI
  7. de Paula, 2009, Quantitative analysis of placental vasculature by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography in normal pregnancies from 12 to 40 weeks of gestation, Placenta, 30, 142, 10.1016/j.placenta.2008.11.010 · DOI
  8. Deurloo, 2007, Reproducibility of 3-dimensional sonographic measurements of fetal and placental volume at gestational ages of 11–18 weeks, J Clin Ultrasound, 35, 125, 10.1002/jcu.20306 · DOI
  9. Fries, 2007, Quality control of an image-scoring method for nuchal translucency ultrasonography, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 196, 272.e1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.866 · DOI
  10. Guimarães Filho, 2010, Reproducibility of three-dimensional power Doppler placental vascular indices in pregnancies between 26 and 35 weeks, Arch Gynecol Obstet
  11. Guiot, 2008, Is three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound useful in the assessment of placental perfusion in normal and growth-restricted pregnancies?, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 31, 171, 10.1002/uog.5212 · DOI
  12. Jones, 2009, In vitro dual perfusion of human placental lobules as a flow phantom to investigate the relationship between fetoplacental flow and quantitative 3-D power Doppler angiography, Placenta, 30, 130, 10.1016/j.placenta.2008.11.002 · DOI
  13. Jones, 2009, Changes in myometrial ‘perfusion’ during normal labor as visualized by three-dimensional power Doppler angiography, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 33, 307, 10.1002/uog.6303 · DOI
  14. Kaplan, 2008, Gross pathology of the placenta: Weight, shape, size, colour, J Clin Pathol, 61, 1285, 10.1136/jcp.2008.055269 · DOI
  15. Lai, 2010, Assessment of the reproducibility of regional placental vascularity/perfusion measurement using 3-D power Doppler, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 36, 202, 10.1002/uog.7608 · DOI
  16. McGraw, 1996, Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients, Psychol Methods, 1, 30, 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Mercé, 2005, Assessment of placental vascularization by three-dimensional power Doppler “vascular biopsy” in normal pregnancies, Croat Med J, 46, 765
  18. Mercé, 2009, Intervillous and uteroplacental circulation in normal early pregnancy and early pregnancy loss assessed by 3-dimensional power Doppler angiography, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 200, 315.e1, 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.020 · DOI
  19. Noguchi, 2009, Placental vascular sonobiopsy using three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in normal and growth restricted fetuses, Placenta, 30, 391, 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.02.010 · DOI
  20. Raine-Fenning, 2004, Endometrial and subendometrial perfusion are impaired in women with unexplained subfertility, Hum Reprod, 19, 2605, 10.1093/humrep/deh459 · DOI
  21. Raine-Fenning, 2004, Quantifying the changes in endometrial vascularity throughout the normal menstrual cycle with three-dimensional power Doppler angiography, Hum Reprod, 19, 330, 10.1093/humrep/deh056 · DOI
  22. Raine-Fenning, 2004, The interobserver reliability of three-dimensional power Doppler data acquisition within the female pelvis, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 23, 501, 10.1002/uog.1019 · DOI
  23. Raine-Fenning, 2008, Determining the relationship between three-dimensional power Doppler data and true blood flow characteristics: An in vitro flow phantom experiment, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 32, 540, 10.1002/uog.6110 · DOI
  24. Raine-Fenning, 2008, Evaluation of the effect of machine settings on quantitative three-dimensional power Doppler angiography: An in vitro flow phantom experiment, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 32, 551, 10.1002/uog.6138 · DOI
  25. Rankin, 1998, Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: An illustration of appropriate statistical analyses, Clin Rehabil, 12, 187, 10.1191/026921598672178340 · DOI
  26. Rovas, 2005, Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of three-dimensional gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasound examinations of the cervix in pregnant women, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 26, 132, 10.1002/uog.1884 · DOI
  27. Walter, 1998, Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies, Stat Med, 17, 101, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::AID-SIM727>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Jones, N. W., Raine-Fenning, N. J., Mousa, H. A., Bradley, E., & Bugg, G. J.
Affiliations
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • Leicester Royal Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Jones, Nia W.
Venue
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
376-385
ISSN
0301-5629 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014435045
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Keywords
placental volume, placental vascularization, intra-rater reliability, inter-rater reliability, second trimester, observer bias
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Female, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Organ Size, Placenta, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color, Placental Circulation, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating the Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of Three-Dimensional Ultrasound and Power Doppler Angiography (3D-PDA) for Assessment of Placental Volume and Vascularity in the Second Trimester of Pregnancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.11.018
The paper
Jones, N. W., Raine-Fenning, N. J., Mousa, H. A., Bradley, E., & Bugg, G. J. (2011). Evaluating the Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of Three-Dimensional Ultrasound and Power Doppler Angiography (3D-PDA) for Assessment of Placental Volume and Vascularity in the Second Trimester of Pregnancy. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.11.018