Cited by 47AI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Ultrasound Image Discrimination between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses Based on a Neural Network Approach

Aramendía-Vidaurreta, Verónica, Cabeza, Rafael, Villanueva, Arantxa, Navallas, Javier, Alcázar, Juan Luis·2016·Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Abstract

The discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in ultrasound images represents one of the most challenging problems in gynecologic practice. In the study described here, a new method for automatic discrimination of adnexal masses based on a neural networks approach was tested. The proposed method first calculates seven different types of characteristics (local binary pattern, fractal dimension, entropy, invariant moments, gray level co-occurrence matrix, law texture energy and Gabor wavelet) from ultrasound images of the ovary, from which several features are extracted and collected together with the clinical patient age. The proposed technique was validated using 106 benign and 39 malignant images obtained from 145 patients, corresponding to its probability of appearance in general population. On evaluation of the classifier, an accuracy of 98.78%, sensitivity of 98.50%, specificity of 98.90% and area under the curve of 0.997 were calculated.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.11.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 47

Metadata

Authors
Aramendía-Vidaurreta, V., Cabeza, R., Villanueva, A., Navallas, J., & Alcázar, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA) (ES)
  • Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Venue
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
742-752
ISSN
0301-5629 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2233192390
Cited by
47
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
adnexal mass, benign versus malignant differentiation, ovarian neoplasms, gynecologic ultrasound, texture features, local binary pattern, fractal dimension, gray level co-occurrence matrix, moment invariants, Gabor wavelets, entropy (information theory), neural network classifier, computer-aided diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adnexal Diseases, Adult, Algorithms, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review