Cited by 70Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Decision Fusion-Based Fetal Ultrasound Image Plane Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks

Open access
Sridar, Pradeeba, Kumar, Ashnil, Quinton, Ann, Nanan, Ralph, Kim, Jinman, Krishnakumar, Ramarathnam·2019·Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Abstract

Machine learning for ultrasound image analysis and interpretation can be helpful in automated image classification in large-scale retrospective analyses to objectively derive new indicators of abnormal fetal development that are embedded in ultrasound images. Current approaches to automatic classification are limited to the use of either image patches (cropped images) or the global (whole) image. As many fetal organs have similar visual features, cropped images can misclassify certain structures such as the kidneys and abdomen. Also, the whole image does not encode sufficient local information about structures to identify different structures in different locations. Here we propose a method to automatically classify 14 different fetal structures in 2-D fetal ultrasound images by fusing information from both cropped regions of fetal structures and the whole image. Our method trains two feature extractors by fine-tuning pre-trained convolutional neural networks with the whole ultrasound fetal images and the discriminant regions of the fetal structures found in the whole image. The novelty of our method is in integrating the classification decisions made from the global and local features without relying on priors. In addition, our method can use the classification outcome to localize the fetal structures in the image. Our experiments on a data set of 4074 2-D ultrasound images (training: 3109, test: 965) achieved a mean accuracy of 97.05%, mean precision of 76.47% and mean recall of 75.41%. The Cohen κ of 0.72 revealed the highest agreement between the ground truth and the proposed method. The superiority of the proposed method over the other non-fusion-based methods is statistically significant (p < 0.05). We found that our method is capable of predicting images without ultrasound scanner overlays with a mean accuracy of 92%. The proposed method can be leveraged to retrospectively classify any ultrasound images in clinical research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.11.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 70

Authors
Sridar, P., Kumar, A., Quinton, A., Nanan, R., Kim, J., & Krishnakumar, R.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
1259-1273
ISSN
0301-5629 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2917535023
Cited by
70
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
IITM-Usyd (DP160103675)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
prenatal ultrasound, decision fusion, global and local features, convolutional neural networks, fine-tuning, pre-trained feature extractor, automated image classification, congenital malformations
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review