Decision Fusion-Based Fetal Ultrasound Image Plane Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Open accessAbstract
Machine learning for ultrasound image analysis and interpretation can be helpful in automated image classification in large-scale retrospective analyses to objectively derive new indicators of abnormal fetal development that are embedded in ultrasound images. Current approaches to automatic classification are limited to the use of either image patches (cropped images) or the global (whole) image. As many fetal organs have similar visual features, cropped images can misclassify certain structures such as the kidneys and abdomen. Also, the whole image does not encode sufficient local information about structures to identify different structures in different locations. Here we propose a method to automatically classify 14 different fetal structures in 2-D fetal ultrasound images by fusing information from both cropped regions of fetal structures and the whole image. Our method trains two feature extractors by fine-tuning pre-trained convolutional neural networks with the whole ultrasound fetal images and the discriminant regions of the fetal structures found in the whole image. The novelty of our method is in integrating the classification decisions made from the global and local features without relying on priors. In addition, our method can use the classification outcome to localize the fetal structures in the image. Our experiments on a data set of 4074 2-D ultrasound images (training: 3109, test: 965) achieved a mean accuracy of 97.05%, mean precision of 76.47% and mean recall of 75.41%. The Cohen κ of 0.72 revealed the highest agreement between the ground truth and the proposed method. The superiority of the proposed method over the other non-fusion-based methods is statistically significant (p < 0.05). We found that our method is capable of predicting images without ultrasound scanner overlays with a mean accuracy of 92%. The proposed method can be leveraged to retrospectively classify any ultrasound images in clinical research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two studies evaluated AI systems to automatically detect 13 standard anatomic planes.
“Two studies evaluated AI systems to automatically detect 13 standard anatomic planes.105,106”
From Artificial intelligence in obstetric ultrasound: A scoping review. (2023) · cites this paper as [106]
AI usage in standard plane acquisition has the benefit of incorporation of clinical aspects into image interpretation.
“the incorporation of clinical aspects into image interpretation [21,23,26]”
When contextual clinical information is additionally incorporated in the AI model, the level of misclassification and misdiagnosis has been shown to be reduced.
“when contextual clinical information is additionally incorporated in the AI model, the level of misclassification and misdiagnosis has been shown to be reduced [23,26].”
Small structures such as the fetal limbs are prone to failing AI recognition.
“Small structures such as the fetal limbs are prone to failing AI recognition [26,138,140]”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Sridar, P., Kumar, A., Quinton, A., Nanan, R., Kim, J., & Krishnakumar, R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1259-1273
- ISSN
- 0301-5629 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2917535023
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- IITM-Usyd (DP160103675)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- prenatal ultrasound, decision fusion, global and local features, convolutional neural networks, fine-tuning, pre-trained feature extractor, automated image classification, congenital malformations
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review