Cited by 316Pomegranate: compositions and health benefitsPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesUltrasound and Cavitation Phenomena

Continuous and pulsed ultrasound-assisted extractions of antioxidants from pomegranate peel

Pan, Zhongli, Qu, Wenjuan, Ma, Haile, Atungulu, Griffiths G., McHugh, Tara H.·2011·Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

Abstract

There is a great demand for developing efficient extraction methods in order to reduce extraction time and increase the yield and activity of functional antioxidants. The yields, activities, and extraction kinetics of antioxidants from dry peel of pomegranate marc were studied using ultrasound-assisted extraction in continuous and pulsed modes and the results were compared with conventional extraction (CE) at a temperature of 25±2°C and water/peel ratio of 50/1, w/w. The studied factors were intensity level and treatment time for continuous ultrasound-assisted extraction (CUAE), and intensity level, number of pulse repetition, and pulse duration and interval for pulsed ultrasound-assisted extraction (PUAE). The results showed that all factors significantly affected the antioxidant yield, but only treatment time had a significant effect on the antioxidant activity. Compared to CE, PUAE at intensity level of 59.2 W/cm(2), and the 5 and 5s of pulse duration and interval increased the antioxidant yield by 22% and reduced the extraction time by 87%. Similarly, CUAE at the same intensity level increased the antioxidant yield by 24% and reduced the extraction time by 90%. Since PUAE had 50% energy saving compared to CUAE, we recommend using PUAE for the extraction with antioxidant yield of 14.5% and DPPH scavenging activity of 5.8 g/g. A second-order kinetic model was successfully developed for describing the mechanism of ultrasound-assisted extractions under PUAE and CUAE. This research clearly demonstrated the superiority of PUAE for producing antioxidants from peel of pomegranate marc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.01.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 316

Authors
Pan, Z., Qu, W., Ma, H., Atungulu, G. G., & McHugh, T. H.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Jiangsu University (CN)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Western Regional Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Pan, Zhongli
  • Qu, Wenjuan
Venue
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
1249-1257
ISSN
1350-4177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4243066629
Cited by
316
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
14.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasonics Sonochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Jiangsu University Research (1281360014)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
Keywords
ultrasound-assisted extraction, pulsed ultrasound, continuous ultrasound, pomegranate peel, antioxidants, extraction kinetics, second-order kinetic model, DPPH radical scavenging, extraction yield, energy conservation
MeSH terms
Antioxidants, Fruit, Plant Extracts, Radiation Dosage, Sonication, Lythraceae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review