Cited by 134Ultrasound and Cavitation PhenomenaUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques

The secondary Bjerknes force between two gas bubbles under dual-frequency acoustic excitation

Open access
Zhang, Yuning, Zhang, Yuning, Li, Shengcai·2016·Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

Abstract

The secondary Bjerknes force is one of the essential mechanisms of mutual interactions between bubbles oscillating in a sound field. The dual-frequency acoustic excitation has been applied in several fields such as sonochemistry, biomedicine and material engineering. In this paper, the secondary Bjerknes force under dual-frequency excitation is investigated both analytically and numerically within a large parameter zone. The unique characteristics (i.e., the complicated patterns of the parameter zone for sign change and the combination resonances) of the secondary Bjerknes force under dual-frequency excitation are revealed. Moreover, the influence of several parameters (e.g., the pressure amplitude, the bubble distance and the phase difference between sound waves) on the secondary Bjerknes force is also investigated numerically.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.08.022

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Double frequency ultrasonic significantly enhances the rate of cavitation compared to single frequency ultrasonic.

    “Compared to single frequency ultrasonic, double frequency ultrasonic significantly enhance the rate of cavitation [101], [102], [103].”

    From A comprehensive review of ultrasonic assisted extraction (UAE) for bioactive components: Principles, advantages, equipment, and combined technologies (2023) · cites this paper as [102]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says multi-frequency excitation can enhance sonoluminescence and sonochemical reaction efficiency compared with single-frequency excitation. It does not say that dual-frequency ultrasound significantly increases the rate of cavitation; the paper instead examines bubble interactions under dual-frequency excitation. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Li, S.
Affiliations
University of Warwick (GB)
Venue
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
29
Pages
129-145
ISSN
1350-4177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2182838491
Cited by
134
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ultrasonics Sonochemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Warwick
  • EPSRC WIMRC (RESCM 9219)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Keywords
secondary Bjerknes force, gas bubbles, bubble interaction, combination resonance, bubble oscillation, pressure amplitude, bubble spacing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review