Cited by 15Nutritional Studies and DietCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismDietary Effects on Health

Adherence to a low-fat diet in men with prostate cancer

Link, Lilli B., Thompson, Seth M., Bosland, Maarten C., Lumey, L.H.·2004·Urology

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate, in a feasibility study, the adherence to a low-fat diet by men with prostate cancer. Evidence is growing that a low-fat diet affects the development and course of prostate cancer. To design preventive and therapeutic interventions, it is important to know whether men will adhere to these nutritional recommendations, particularly when motivated by the diagnosis of prostate cancer.Methods Men with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels, most of whom were recently treated for prostate cancer, were randomized to one of four dietary regimens for which they received nutritional counseling: a low-fat diet (15% fat or less) with supplements (vitamin E and selenium), a low-fat diet (15% fat or less) without the supplements, the supplements alone, and a control group. Adherence was evaluated by the change in weight, fat intake, free fatty acids, cholesterol, high-density and low-density lipoproteins, and triglycerides during a 12-month period.Results The mean age of the 48 participants was 66 years. For those counseled about a low-fat diet, the mean change in the percentage of energy (kilocalories) in the diet from fat was greater after 3 months (-8.6% versus +2.1%, P <0.001) and 12 months (-9.8% versus -1.6%, P = 0.001). Three months after starting the intervention, those randomized to low-fat dietary counseling had lost 2 kg, on average, compared with 0.8 kg lost by those who did not receive this counseling (P = 0.09). At 12 months, those receiving low-fat counseling had lost 2.8 kg, on average, compared with 0.5 kg gained among the other groups (P = 0.02).Conclusions With appropriate counseling, men with prostate cancer can adhere to a low-fat dietary intervention for a 12-month period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.040

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Link, L. B., Thompson, S. M., Bosland, M. C., & Lumey, L. H.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Institute for Cancer Prevention (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Lumey, L.H.
Venue
Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
970-975
ISSN
0090-4295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065255672
Cited by
15
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
prostate cancer, low-fat diet, dietary adherence, nutrition counseling, vitamin E, selenium supplements, weight loss, dietary fat intake, lipid profile, prostate-specific antigen, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Aged, Body Weight, Cholesterol, Dietary Fats, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Male, Nutritional Requirements, Patient Compliance, Prostatic Neoplasms, Time Factors, United States, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review