Cited by 35Prostate Cancer Treatment and ResearchPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Expression of cytochrome P450 3A4 and its clinical significance in human prostate cancer

Fujimura, Tetsuya, Takahashi, Satoru, Urano, Tomohiko, Kumagai, Jinpei, Murata, Taro, Takayama, Kenichi, Ogushi, Tetsuo, Horie-Inoue, Kuniko +5 more·2009·Urology

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate CYP3A4 expression in human prostrate cancer (PCa) tissues. Enzymes of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) family are key inactivators of testosterone in the liver and prostate. We previously reported that CYP2B6 is a growth-inhibitory and prognostic factor in human PCa; however, the status of CYP3A4 in PCa remains unclear.Methods We used immunohistochemistry to analyze CYP3A4 expression in 107 human PCa specimens obtained by radical prostatectomy. Stained slides were evaluated for the proportion and staining intensity of positively stained cells. Total immunoreactivity scores (0-8) were obtained as the sum of the proportion and intensity scores. In addition, we estimated the relationship between CYP3A4 status and clinicopathologic features.Results CYP3A4 immunoreactivity was identified in the cytoplasm of prostate cells. The CYP3A4 immunoreactive PCa score (3.6+/-2.6) was significantly lower than that of benign epithelium (4.5+/-2.1; P < .0001). In addition, CYP3A4 immunoreactivity correlated inversely with the Gleason score (P < .0001). Decreased CYP3A4 immunoreactivity was significantly related to a poor prognosis in human PCa (P = .0175).Conclusions We demonstrated differential CYP3A4 expression in prostatic tissues, indicating that decreased CYP3A4 expression may contribute to the development of PCa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.urology.2009.02.033

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fujimura, T., Takahashi, S., Urano, T., Kumagai, J., Murata, T., Takayama, K., Ogushi, T., Horie-Inoue, K., Ouchi, Y., Kitamura, T., Muramatsu, M., Homma, Y., & Inoue, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Nihon University (JP)
  • Saitama Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Fujimura, Tetsuya
Venue
Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
74
Issue
2
Pages
391-397
ISSN
0090-4295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109023371
Cited by
34
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
CYP3A4, prostate cancer, testosterone metabolism, Gleason score, prognosis, immunohistochemical expression, benign prostatic epithelium, CYP2B6
MeSH terms
Aged, Cytoplasm, Epithelium, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Lymph Nodes, Lymphatic Metastasis, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prostate, Prostatic Neoplasms, Hepatocytes, Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review