Cited by 26Sperm and Testicular FunctionMale Reproductive Health StudiesReproductive Health and Technologies

Assessment of Time-dependent Changes in Semen Parameters in Infertile Men After Microsurgical Varicocelectomy

Fukuda, Teruo, Miyake, Hideaki, Enatsu, Noritoshi, Matsushita, Kei, Fujisawa, Masato·2015·Urology

Abstract

Objective To characterize the changes in seminogram findings in infertile men after varicocelectomy. Methods This study included 71 consecutive infertile men who underwent microsurgical low ligation varicocelectomy and received 3 semen analyses, 1 before microsurgical varicocelectomy and again at 3 and 12 months after. Total motile sperm count (TMSC) was calculated using the following formula: [volume (mL) × concentration (millions/mL) × motility (%)]. Results Despite the lack of significant changes in the proportion of sperm with abnormal morphology, sperm concentration, motility, and TMSC in the 71 patients were significantly higher at 3 and 12 months after varicocelectomy than before surgery. However, no further improvement in these parameters at 12 months after varicocelectomy was noted compared with those at 3 months. Furthermore, when the included men were divided into 3 groups according to preoperative TMSC as 9 million, TMSCs at 3 months after varicocelectomy in all 3 groups were significantly higher than those before varicocelectomy; however, TMSCs at 12 months after surgery in all groups were similar to those at 3 months. Conclusion The level of improvement in semen parameters at 3 months after varicocelectomy may be stable at 12 months after surgery, irrespective of baseline values of TMSC. Therefore, varicocelectomy could be offered as a therapeutic option for infertile men, even for couples with an older woman, because its efficacy is evaluable at 3 months after…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.urology.2015.04.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fukuda, T., Miyake, H., Enatsu, N., Matsushita, K., & Fujisawa, M.
Affiliations
Kobe University (JP)
Corresponding author
Miyake, Hideaki
Venue
Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
86
Issue
1
Pages
48-51
ISSN
0090-4295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1534107296
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
varicocelectomy, male infertility, semen parameters, total motile sperm count, sperm motility, sperm concentration, sperm morphology, assisted reproduction
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Infertility, Male, Ligation, Male, Microsurgery, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Sperm Motility, Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male, Time Factors, Varicocele, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Semen Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review