Cited by 43Sperm and Testicular FunctionSmoking Behavior and CessationReproductive Health and Technologies

Sperm concentration and semen volume increase after smoking cessation in infertile men

Open access
Kulaksiz, Deniz, Toprak, Tuncay, Tokat, Eda, Yilmaz, Mehmet, Ramazanoglu, Mehmet Akif, Garayev, Asgar, Sulukaya, Muhammed, Degirmentepe, Recep Burak +3 more·2022·International Journal of Impotence Research

Abstract

Smoking has negative reproductive consequences. This study investigated the effect of smoking cessation on the main semen parameters. We included 90 participants who applied to our infertility clinic and smoked at least 20 cigarettes a day for at least 1 year. Of the 90 participants, 48 were in the study group and 42 were in the control group. Semen analysis was performed before and at least 3 months after quitting smoking in the study group. Semen analysis was repeated at baseline and at least 3 months later in the control group. Semen parameters such as volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count, morphology, and motility were evaluated according to the World Health Organization criteria. Patient characteristics as well as the duration of the smoking period, the number of cigarettes smoked per day and the time elapsed since smoking cessation were recorded. The mean age of the participants was 34.69 ± 5.3 years, and the duration of infertility was 34.12 ± 12.1 months (n = 90). The number of cigarettes smoked per day was 30.14 ± 6.69, and the smoking time was 8.31 ± 3.53 years. The average time to quit smoking was 104.2 ± 11.51 days (n = 48). A significant increase in semen volume, sperm concentration and total sperm count was observed 3 months after smoking cessation (2.48 ± 0.79 ml vs. 2.90 ± 0.77 ml, p = 0.002; 18.45 × 10 6/ml ± 8.56 vs. 22.64 × 10 6/ml ± 11.69, p = 0.001; 45.04 ± 24.38 × 10 6 vs. 65.1 ± 34.9 × 10 6, p < 0.001, respectively). This study showed that smoking cessation had a positive effect on sperm concentration, semen volume, and total sperm count. Although smoking cessation contributed positively to sperm motility and morphology, the difference was not statistically significant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41443-022-00605-0

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 7 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    There is only one case report in the literature investigating whether the same individual has improved semen parameters after a 3-month smoking cessation program.

    “Most of the studies compare semen parameters of smokers with nonsmokers, and there is only one case report in the literature investigating whether the same individual has improved semen parameters after a 3-month smoking cessation program [16].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Prentki Santos E, López-Costa S, Chenlo P, Pugliese MN, Curi S, Ariagno J, et al. Impact of spontaneous smoking cessation on sperm quality: case report. Andrologia. 2011;43:431–5. source

      The Summary and Semen analysis sections describe a case report comparing one man’s semen parameters before and after three months of smoking cessation, with improvement in several parameters. The paper does not establish that it was the only such case report in the literature; it also describes spontaneous cessation rather than a structured program. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Three months is usually a sufficient time to see changes in semen analysis results.

    “It is stated that 3 months is usually a sufficient time to see changes in semen analysis results [23][24][25].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [23] Fukuda T, Miyake H, Enatsu N, Matsushita K, Fujisawa M. Assessment of time-dependent changes in semen parameters in infertile men after microsurgical varicocelectomy. Urology. 2015;86:48–51. source
    • cites [24] Al Bakri A, Lo K, Grober E, Cassidy D, Cardoso JP, Jarvi K. Time for improvement in semen parameters after varicocelectomy. J Urol. 2012;187:227–31. source
    • cites [25] Ghaed MA, Makian SA, Moradi A, Maghsoudi R, Gandomi-Mohammadabadi A. Best time to wait for the improvement of the sperm parameter after varicocelectomy: 3 or 6 months? Arch Ital di Urol e Androl. 2020. https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2020.3.259. source

      The discussion ('Two meta-analysis by Agarwal et al.') reports improved sperm concentration and motility at three months after varicocelectomy, with no further improvement at six months. It did not find improvement in morphology or semen volume. The citing sentence omits the post-varicocelectomy setting and thus states the point more broadly than this study supports. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    At 3 months, total sperm count was significantly higher in the smoking cessation group than in the control group (p < 0.001).

    “Semen volume, sperm concentration and total sperm count were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group in the 3rd month (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    At 3 months, sperm concentration was significantly higher in the smoking cessation group than in the control group (p = 0.001).

    “Semen volume, sperm concentration and total sperm count were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group in the 3rd month (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    At 3 months, semen volume was significantly higher in the smoking cessation group than in the control group (p = 0.001).

    “Semen volume, sperm concentration and total sperm count were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group in the 3rd month (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
  • May combine two claims. 10
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Semen analysis is the most common and valid diagnostic test for sperm quality.

    “Semen analysis is the most common and valid diagnostic test for sperm quality and involves the evaluation of semen volume and total count, sperm concentration, sperm morphology and sperm motility [12].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Hwang K, Walters RC, Lipshultz LI. Contemporary concepts in the evaluation and management of male infertility. Nat Rev Urol. 2011;8:86–94. source
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    In infertile men who smoked at least 20 cigarettes/day for at least 1 year, sperm motility increased after smoking cessation but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.190).

    “Although sperm motility and morphology increased after smoking cessation, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.190, and p = 0.120, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    In infertile men who smoked at least 20 cigarettes/day for at least 1 year, sperm morphology increased after smoking cessation but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.120).

    “Although sperm motility and morphology increased after smoking cessation, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.190, and p = 0.120, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    One patient in the control group and 8 patients in the study group became normospermic at 3 months.

    “One patient in the control group and 8 patients in the study group became normospermic in the 3rd month.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The proportion of oligozoospermic patients in the control group decreased from 69% to 66.6% at 3 months, but the change was not statistically significant (p = 0.441).

    “While the proportion of oligozoospermic patients decreased significantly from 70.8% to 54.2% in the cessation group (p = 0.043), it decreased from 69% to 66.6% in the control group (p = 0.441).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    There were no statistically significant differences between the cessation and control groups at baseline in age, BMI, educational level, duration of infertility, smoking time, or average number of cigarettes smoked per day.

    “In terms of age, body mass index, educational level, duration of infertility, smoking time, and average number of cigarettes smoked per day, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Hormonal evaluation was not performed on participants.

    “Finally, hormonal evaluation was not performed on the participants in our study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study conducted a pilot study with 8 participants and determined that at least 40 participants were needed per group at a significance level of 0.05.

    “We conducted a pilot study with 8 participants to evaluate a required number of participants at a significance level of 0.05 using version 3.01 of the G* Power software (Franz Foul, Kiel, Germany), and found that at least 40 participants were needed for each group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Smoking cessation may improve semen quality and reduce the number of patients with abnormal parameters by improving semen volume, sperm concentration, and total sperm count.

    “Our study showed that smoking cessation may improve semen quality and reduce the number of patients with abnormal parameters by improving semen volume, sperm concentration and total sperm count.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The observed improvements in semen parameters in the cessation group are attributable to smoking cessation rather than to other differences between groups or lifestyle changes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Smoking has an adverse effect on semen quality in both fertile and sterile men and is associated with decreased sperm motility and count, particularly in moderate to heavy smokers.

    “A meta-analysis of studies with a large population of 5865 men from 26 regions/countries reported that smoking has an adverse effect on semen quality in both fertile and sterile men and is associated with decreased sperm motility and count, particularly in moderate to heavy smokers [15].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] Sharma R, Harlev A, Agarwal A, Esteves SC. Cigarette smoking and semen quality: a new meta-analysis examining the effect of the 2010 World Health Organization laboratory methods for the examination of human semen. Eur Urol. 2016;70:635–45. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Smoking cessation had a positive effect on sperm concentration, semen volume, and total sperm count in infertile men.

    “This study showed that smoking cessation had a positive effect on sperm concentration, semen volume, and total sperm count.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The observed improvements in semen parameters in the cessation group are attributable to smoking cessation rather than to other differences between groups or lifestyle changes.
11 of 11
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The observed improvements in semen parameters in the cessation group are attributable to smoking cessation rather than to other differences between groups or lifestyle changes.

    “Our study showed that smoking cessation may improve semen quality and reduce the number of patients with abnormal parameters by improving semen volume, sperm concentration and total sperm count.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Control group participants did not quit smoking during the 3-month follow-up.

    “60 patients who did not accept smoking cessation were assigned to the control group.”
    “The same follow-up was performed at 3-month intervals in the control group.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Study group participants remained abstinent from smoking for the 3-month period.

    “Semen analysis was performed before and at least 3 months after quitting smoking in the study group.”
    “The average time to quit smoking was 104.2 ± 11.51 days (n = 48).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Participants who dropped out or were excluded did not differ systematically from those included in the analysis.

    “Eighteen participants in the control group and 22 participants in the study group were excluded from the study due to not being able to continue the follow-ups for reasons such as the COVID-19 pandemic, being out of the city, not being able to quit smoking, and not coming to the 3rd-month visit.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One non-randomized trial in India suggested that men willing to stop smoking showed better quality sperm within 3 months of smoking cessation than men unwilling to stop smoking.

    “One non-randomized trial in India suggested that men willing to stop smoking showed better quality sperm within 3 months of smoking cessation than men unwilling to stop smoking (Kulaksiz et al., 2022).”

    From Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature (2024) · cites this paper as Kulaksiz et al., 2022

    The Materials and Methods describe a prospective nonrandomized trial comparing men who accepted smoking cessation with men who did not. The Results report significantly higher semen volume, sperm concentration, and total sperm count in the cessation group at three months. The location is wrong: the Methods describe the study population using data from Turkey, not India. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Smoking-cessation odds-ratio intervals conflict with their p-values

    Major

    In Table 3, the 95% confidence intervals for the smoking-cessation odds ratios for sperm motility and morphology both exclude 1, but their corresponding p-values are 0.196 and 0.138. Those intervals indicate statistical significance at the 0.05 level, while the p-values do not, affecting the reported conclusion that these changes were not significant.

  • Infertility-duration odds-ratio intervals conflict with their p-values

    Major

    The duration-of-infertility odds ratios for sperm motility and morphology have 95% confidence intervals that exclude 1, while their corresponding p-values are 0.188 and 0.115.

  • BMI odds-ratio intervals conflict with their p-values

    Minor

    The BMI odds ratios for sperm motility and morphology have 95% confidence intervals that exclude 1, but their corresponding p-values are 0.202 and 0.132.

  • Age odds-ratio intervals conflict with their p-values

    Minor

    The age odds ratios for sperm motility and morphology likewise have 95% confidence intervals that exclude 1, whereas their corresponding p-values, 0.186 and 0.113, exceed 0.05.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. World Health Organisation (2019) WHO global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco use third edition.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kulaksiz, D., Toprak, T., Tokat, E., Yilmaz, M., Ramazanoglu, M. A., Garayev, A., Sulukaya, M., Degirmentepe, R. B., Allahverdiyev, E., Gul, M., & Verit, A.
Affiliations
  • Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR)
  • Istanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital (TR)
Corresponding author
Toprak, Tuncay
Venue
International Journal of Impotence Research
Published
2022-08-13
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
614-619
ISSN
  • 0955-9930 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5489
OpenAlex
W4291116244
Cited by
43
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Impotence Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
smoking cessation, male infertility, sperm concentration, semen volume, total sperm count, semen parameters, sperm motility, sperm morphology
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Infertility, Infertility, Male, Male, Semen, Smoking, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Smoking Cessation, Semen Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-05.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-05.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review