The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of CTL epitopes using QM, SVM and ANN techniques
Abstract
Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes are potential candidates for subunit vaccine design for various diseases. Most of the existing T cell epitope prediction methods are indirect methods that predict MHC class I binders instead of CTL epitopes. In this study, a systematic attempt has been made to develop a direct method for predicting CTL epitopes from an antigenic sequence. This method is based on quantitative matrix (QM) and machine learning techniques such as Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). This method has been trained and tested on non-redundant dataset of T cell epitopes and non-epitopes that includes 1137 experimentally proven MHC class I restricted T cell epitopes. The accuracy of QM-, ANN- and SVM-based methods was 70.0, 72.2 and 75.2%, respectively. The performance of these methods has been evaluated through Leave One Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV) at a cutoff score where sensitivity and specificity was nearly equal. Finally, both machine-learning methods were used for consensus and combined prediction of CTL epitopes. The performances of these methods were evaluated on blind dataset where machine learning-based methods perform better than QM-based method. We also demonstrated through subgroup analysis that our methods can discriminate between T-cell epitopes and MHC binders (non-epitopes). In brief this method allows prediction of CTL epitopes using QM, SVM, ANN approaches. The method also facilitates prediction of MHC restriction in predicted T cell epitopes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods
Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511801389 · Cited by 13,855
Introduction to the theory of neural computation
(1994) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(94)90014-0 · Cited by 6,401
Advances in kernel methods: support vector learning
Schölkopf, B., Burges, C. J. C., & Smola, A. J. (1999) · doi:10.5555/299094 · Cited by 5,789
Making Large-Scale SVM Learning Practical
Joachims, T. (1998) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.17877/de290r-14262 · Cited by 4,411
MHC ligands and peptide motifs: first listing
Rammensee, H.-G., Friede, T., & Stevanović, S. (1995) · Immunogenetics · doi:10.1007/bf00172063 · Cited by 1,638
Stern, L. J., Brown, J. H., Jardetzky, T. S., Gorga, J. C., Urban, R. G., Strominger, J. L., & Wiley, D. C. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/368215a0 · Cited by 1,555
Parker, K. C., Bednarek, M. A., & Coligan, J. E. (1994) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.152.1.163 · Cited by 1,370
Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation
Hertz, J., Krogh, A., Palmer, R. G., & Horner, H. (1991) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2810360 · Cited by 1,079
ProPred: prediction of HLA-DR binding sites
Singh, H., & Raghava, G. P. S. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1236 · Cited by 841
Self-citation
Cited by
Designing of interferon-gamma inducing MHC class-II binders
Dhanda, S. K., Vir, P., & Raghava, G. P. (2013) · Biology Direct · doi:10.1186/1745-6150-8-30 · Cited by 837
Self-citationCheng, J. C. P., Chen, W., Chen, K., & Wang, Q. (2020) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103087 · Cited by 520
Baruah, V., & Bose, S. (2020) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.25698 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhasin, M., & Raghava, G. P. S.
- Venue
- Vaccine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 23-24
- Pages
- 3195-3204
- ISSN
- 0264-410X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2159767366
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of CTL epitopes using QM, SVM and ANN techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.02.005
- The paper
- Bhasin, M., & Raghava, G. P. S. (2004). Prediction of CTL epitopes using QM, SVM and ANN techniques. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.02.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.