Cited by 1,079Neural Networks and ApplicationsNeural dynamics and brain functionNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing

Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation

Hertz, John, Krogh, Anders, Palmer, Richard G., Horner, Heinz·1991·Physics Today

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.2810360

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using tricks-of-trade and allowing small retrieval errors, the storage capacity of classical Hopfield networks is about 0.138 d.

    “Using tricks-of-trade and allowing small retrieval errors, the storage capacity is about 0 . 138 d (Crisanti et al., 1986; Hertz et al., 1991; Torres et al., 2002).”

    From Hopfield Networks is All You Need (2020) · cites this paper as Hertz et al., 1991

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hertz, J., Krogh, A., Palmer, R. G., & Horner, H.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
Physics Today
Published
1991-12-01
Volume
44
Issue
12
Pages
70-70
ISSN
  • 0031-9228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0699
OpenAlex
W4214871172
Cited by
1,079
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 27
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physics Today (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Keywords
neural computation, computational neuroscience, artificial neural networks, brain computation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review