Cited by 84Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and managementHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Chapter 19: Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening

Goldie, Sue J., Kim, Jane J., Myers, Evan·2006·Vaccine

Abstract

In the last two decades, computer-based models of cervical cancer screening have been used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different secondary prevention policies. Analyses in countries with existing screening programs have focused on identifying the optimal screening interval, ages for starting and stopping screening, and consideration of enhancements to conventional cytology, such as human papillomavirus (HPV)-DNA testing as a triage for equivocal results or as a primary screening test for women over the age of 30. Analyses in resource-poor settings with infrequent or no screening have focused on strategies that enhance the linkage between screening and treatment, consider noncytologic alternatives such as HPV-DNA testing, and target women between the ages of 35 and 45 for screening one, two, or three times per lifetime. Despite differences in methods and assumptions, this paper identifies the qualitative themes that are consistent among studies, and highlights important methodological challenges and high-priority areas for further work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.114

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because capturing screening history in Markov states can lead to state explosion, it may be necessary to use an individual-level STM with screening history included as tracker variables.

    “As capturing screening history in the Markov states can lead to state explosion, it may be necessary to use an individual-level STM, with screening history included as tracker variables [22].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldie, S. J., Kim, J. J., & Myers, E.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Goldie, Sue J.
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-08
Volume
24
Pages
S164-S170
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057061243
Cited by
84
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA093435)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
cervical cancer screening, cost-effectiveness, secondary prevention, screening frequency, HPV testing, resource-limited settings
MeSH terms
Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Papillomavirus Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review