Cited by 197Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeWomen's cancer prevention and management

Health and economic outcomes of HPV 16,18 vaccination in 72 GAVI-eligible countries

Goldie, Sue J., O'Shea, Meredith, Campos, Nicole Gastineau, Diaz, Mireia, Sweet, Steven, Kim, Sun-Young·2008·Vaccine

Abstract

The risk of dying from cervical cancer is disproportionately borne by women in developing countries. Two new vaccines are highly effective in preventing HPV 16,18 infection, responsible for approximately 70% of cervical cancer, in girls not previously infected. The GAVI Alliance (GAVI) provides technical assistance and financial support for immunization in the world's poorest countries. Using population-based and epidemiologic data for 72 GAVI-eligible countries we estimate averted cervical cancer cases and deaths, disability-adjusted years of life (DALYs) averted and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (I$/DALY averted) associated with HPV 16,18 vaccination of young adolescent girls. In addition to vaccine coverage and efficacy, relative and absolute cancer reduction depended on underlying incidence, proportion attributable to HPV types 16 and 18, population age-structure and competing mortality. With 70% coverage, mean reduction in the lifetime risk of cancer is below 40% in some countries (e.g., Nigeria, Ghana) and above 50% in others (e.g., India, Uganda, Kenya). At I$10 per vaccinated girl (approximately $2.00 per dose assuming three doses, plus wastage, administration, program support) vaccination was cost-effective in all countries using a per capita GDP threshold; for 49 of 72 countries, the cost per DALY averted was less than I$100 and for 59 countries, it was less than I$200. Taking into account country-specific assumptions (per capita GNI, DPT3 coverage, percenta…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.04.053

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Per 1000 girls vaccinated, 15 deaths would be averted, compared with 3 deaths prevented per 1000 children vaccinated for rotavirus.

    “For example, we found that per 1000 girls vaccinated, 15 deaths would be averted (Goldie et al. 2008 in press), which compares favourably to 3 deaths prevented per 1000 children vaccinated for rotavirus (IAVI/PATH, 2007).”

    From Health and economic impact of HPV 16 and 18 vaccination and cervical cancer screening in India (2008) · cites this paper as Goldie et al. 2008 in press

  • The benefits of HPV 16,18 vaccination, when presented in formats not influenced by discounting, are comparable to those of other new vaccines.

    “Even so, as we have documented in other work, the benefits of HPV 16,18 vaccination, when presented in formats that are not influenced by discounting, are comparable to those of other new vaccines.”

    From Health and economic impact of HPV 16 and 18 vaccination and cervical cancer screening in India (2008) · cites this paper as Goldie et al. 2008 in press

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldie, S. J., O'Shea, M., Campos, N. G., Diaz, M., Sweet, S., & Kim, S.-Y.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Goldie, Sue J.
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
26
Issue
32
Pages
4080-4093
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980262620
Cited by
197
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 19
FWCI
12.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
cervical cancer prevention, adolescent girls, GAVI Alliance, cost-effectiveness, vaccine affordability, vaccination coverage, developing countries, immunization programs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Developing Countries, Female, Humans, Vaccination, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Economic, Papillomavirus Infections, Human papillomavirus 18, Human papillomavirus 16, Papillomavirus Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review