Cited by 188Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsInfluenza Virus Research StudiesData-Driven Disease Surveillance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines in adults: Background for pandemic influenza vaccine safety monitoring

Abstract

In preparation for pandemic vaccine safety monitoring, we assessed adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System following receipt of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines among adults from 1990 through 2005. We calculated reporting rates for nonserious, serious, and neurological adverse events. We reviewed reports of recurrent events and deaths, as well as reports identified through advanced signal detection. The most frequently reported events were local reactions and systemic symptoms. Guillain-Barré syndrome was the most frequently reported serious event (0.70 reports per million vaccinations). Adverse event reporting rates have been reasonably constant over time. No new safety concerns emerged after our review of 15 years of post-licensure surveillance data. These findings provide useful information if pandemic vaccine is rapidly distributed and pre-licensure data are limited.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.01.125

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. King, 2001, National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI), Supplementary statement on influenza vaccination: continued use of Fluviral influenza vaccine in the 2000–2001 influenza season, Can Commun Dis Rep, 27, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Vellozzi, C., Burwen, D. R., Dobardzic, A., Ball, R., Walton, K., & Haber, P.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (US)
Corresponding author
Vellozzi, Claudia
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
27
Issue
15
Pages
2114-2120
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008361529
Cited by
188
References
64
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
FWCI
26.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
Keywords
trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine, vaccine safety, adverse events, VAERS, post-licensure surveillance, pandemic influenza vaccine, Guillain-Barré syndrome, neurological adverse events, local reactions, signal detection, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Influenza, Human, Influenza Vaccines, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Guillain-Barre Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review