Cited by 212Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus researchHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Randomized, double-blind, Phase 1 trial of an alphavirus replicon vaccine for cytomegalovirus in CMV seronegative adult volunteers

Bernstein, David I., Reap, Elizabeth A., Katen, Kevin, Watson, Aubrey, Smith, Kaitlin, Norberg, Pamela, Olmsted, Robert A., Hoeper, Amy +4 more·2009·Vaccine

Abstract

Development of a cytomegalovirus (CMV) vaccine is a priority. We evaluated a two component alphavirus replicon particle vaccine expressing CMV gB or a pp65/IE1 fusion protein, previously shown to induce robust antibody and cellular immune responses in mice, in a randomized, double-blind Phase 1 clinical trial in CMV seronegative subjects. Forty subjects received a lower dose (LD) or higher dose (HD) of vaccine or placebo by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 8 and 24. The vaccine was well tolerated, with mild to moderate local reactogenicity, minimal systemic reactogenicity, and no clinically important changes in laboratory parameters. All vaccine recipients developed ex vivo, direct IFN-gamma ELISPOT responses to CMV antigens (maximal mean spot-forming cells per 10(6) PBMC in LD and HD groups of 348 and 504 for pp65, 83 and 113 for IE1, and 138 and 114 for gB), and neutralizing antibodies (maximal geometric mean titer 110 with LD and 218 with HD). Polyfunctional CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses were detected by polychromatic flow cytometry. This alphavirus replicon particle vaccine was safe and induced neutralizing antibody and multifunctional T cell responses against three CMV antigens that are important targets for protective immunity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.135

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VRPs are potent vaccines in mice, nonhuman primates, and humans.

    “VRPs are potent vaccines in mice (10,11), nonhuman primates (11,22), and humans (25).”

    From Nonviral delivery of self-amplifying RNA vaccines (2012) · cites this paper as [25]

  • VRPs have been shown to be potent in nonhuman primates and humans at a 100-fold higher dose (1 × 10^8 IU).

    “VRPs have been shown to be potent in nonhuman primates and humans at a 100-fold higher dose (1 × 10 8 IU) (22,25), and thus we anticipate that this unique RNA vaccine will be immunogenic at submilligram doses in larger species, but this remains to be directly tested.”

    From Nonviral delivery of self-amplifying RNA vaccines (2012) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Those studies showed RNA vaccines to be well tolerated and immunogenic.

    “Those studies showed RNA vaccines to be well tolerated and immunogenic.”

    From Nonviral delivery of self-amplifying RNA vaccines (2012) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Various RNA vaccines have been evaluated in human clinical trials, including naked and formulated non-amplifying mRNA and self-amplifying RNA packaged in VRPs.

    “Various RNA vaccines have been evaluated in human clinical trials, including naked and formulated non-amplifying mRNA (37-39) and self-amplifying RNA packaged in VRPs (25).”

    From Nonviral delivery of self-amplifying RNA vaccines (2012) · cites this paper as [25]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 212

Authors
Bernstein, D. I., Reap, E. A., Katen, K., Watson, A., Smith, K., Norberg, P., Olmsted, R. A., Hoeper, A., Morris, J., Negri, S., Maughan, M. F., & Chulay, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • AlphaVax (United States) (US)
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
484-493
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052546898
Cited by
212
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 20
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
AlphaVax, Inc.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
cytomegalovirus vaccine, neutralizing antibodies, IFN-gamma ELISPOT, polyfunctional T cell responses, vaccine safety, reactogenicity, dose comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antibody Formation, Antigens, Viral, Cytomegalovirus, Double-Blind Method, Flow Cytometry, Humans, Immunity, Cellular, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, T-Lymphocytes, Cytomegalovirus Vaccines, Young Adult, Antibodies, Neutralizing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review