Cited by 67Mosquito-borne diseases and controlTravel-related health issuesHistory of Medicine and Tropical Health

Vaccines and vaccination against yellow fever: WHO Position Paper, June 2013—Recommendations

WHO·2015·Vaccine

Abstract

This article presents the World Health Organizations (WHO) evidence and recommendations for the use of yellow fever (YF) vaccination from "Vaccines and vaccination against yellow fever: WHO Position Paper - June 2013" published in the Weekly Epidemiological Record. This position paper summarizes the WHO position on the use of YF vaccination, in particular that a single dose of YF vaccine is sufficient to confer sustained life-long protective immunity against YF disease. A booster dose is not necessary. The current document replaces the position paper on the use of yellow fever vaccines and vaccination published in 2003. Footnotes to this paper provide a number of core references. In accordance with its mandate to provide guidance to Member States on health policy matters, WHO issues a series of regularly updated position papers on vaccines and combinations of vaccines against diseases that have an international public health impact. These papers are concerned primarily with the use of vaccines in large-scale immunization programmes; they summarize essential background information on diseases and vaccines, and conclude with WHO's current position on the use of vaccines in the global context. This paper reflects the recommendations of WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on immunization. These recommendations were discussed by SAGE at its April 2013 meeting. Evidence presented at the meeting can be accessed at http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/previous/en/index.html.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.05.040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lifelong protection seems to be the rule following a single dose with some live attenuated viral vaccines, such as yellow fever vaccine.

    “lifelong protection seems to be the rule following a single dose with some of the live attenuated viral vaccines, such as yellow fever vaccine49”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WHO
Corresponding author
WHO
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
76-77
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4255504044
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Travel-related health issues
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine and Tropical Health
Keywords
yellow fever, yellow fever vaccine, vaccine recommendations, single-dose vaccination, lifelong immunity, booster vaccination, immunization programs
MeSH terms
Humans, Vaccination, World Health Organization, Yellow Fever, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Yellow Fever Vaccine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review