Vaccines and vaccination against yellow fever: WHO Position Paper, June 2013—Recommendations
Abstract
This article presents the World Health Organizations (WHO) evidence and recommendations for the use of yellow fever (YF) vaccination from "Vaccines and vaccination against yellow fever: WHO Position Paper - June 2013" published in the Weekly Epidemiological Record. This position paper summarizes the WHO position on the use of YF vaccination, in particular that a single dose of YF vaccine is sufficient to confer sustained life-long protective immunity against YF disease. A booster dose is not necessary. The current document replaces the position paper on the use of yellow fever vaccines and vaccination published in 2003. Footnotes to this paper provide a number of core references. In accordance with its mandate to provide guidance to Member States on health policy matters, WHO issues a series of regularly updated position papers on vaccines and combinations of vaccines against diseases that have an international public health impact. These papers are concerned primarily with the use of vaccines in large-scale immunization programmes; they summarize essential background information on diseases and vaccines, and conclude with WHO's current position on the use of vaccines in the global context. This paper reflects the recommendations of WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on immunization. These recommendations were discussed by SAGE at its April 2013 meeting. Evidence presented at the meeting can be accessed at http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/previous/en/index.html.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lifelong protection seems to be the rule following a single dose with some live attenuated viral vaccines, such as yellow fever vaccine.
“lifelong protection seems to be the rule following a single dose with some of the live attenuated viral vaccines, such as yellow fever vaccine49”
From A guide to vaccinology: from basic principles to new developments (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A guide to vaccinology: from basic principles to new developments
Pollard, A. J., & Bijker, E. M. (2021) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-020-00479-7 · Cited by 1,593 · see citing works
Schulz, A. R., Mälzer, J. N., Domingo, C., Jürchott, K., Grützkau, A., Babel, N., Nienen, M., Jelinek, T., Niedrig, M., & Thiel, A. (2015) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1500598 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
- Authors
- WHO
- Corresponding author
- WHO
- Venue
- Vaccine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-77
- ISSN
- 0264-410X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4255504044
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Vaccine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Travel-related health issues
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine and Tropical Health
- Keywords
- yellow fever, yellow fever vaccine, vaccine recommendations, single-dose vaccination, lifelong immunity, booster vaccination, immunization programs
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Vaccination, World Health Organization, Yellow Fever, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Yellow Fever Vaccine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review