The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring vaccine hesitancy: The development of a survey tool
Open accessAbstract
In March 2012, the SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy was convened to define the term "vaccine hesitancy", as well as to map the determinants of vaccine hesitancy and develop tools to measure and address the nature and scale of hesitancy in settings where it is becoming more evident. The definition of vaccine hesitancy and a matrix of determinants guided the development of a survey tool to assess the nature and scale of hesitancy issues. Additionally, vaccine hesitancy questions were piloted in the annual WHO-UNICEF joint reporting form, completed by National Immunization Managers globally. The objective of characterizing the nature and scale of vaccine hesitancy issues is to better inform the development of appropriate strategies and policies to address the concerns expressed, and to sustain confidence in vaccination. The Working Group developed a matrix of the determinants of vaccine hesitancy informed by a systematic review of peer reviewed and grey literature, and by the expertise of the working group. The matrix mapped the key factors influencing the decision to accept, delay or reject some or all vaccines under three categories: contextual, individual and group, and vaccine-specific. These categories framed the menu of survey questions presented in this paper to help diagnose and address vaccine hesitancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants
MacDonald, N. E. (2015) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036 · Cited by 5,573 · cited 1×
“counting only vaccine refusers will not capture hesitancy; (2) Vaccine hesitancy is defined as delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite availability of vaccine services [125] and it is therefore essential to assess the different reasons why people are under- or unvaccinated in a particular setting to be able…”
BackgroundSelf-citationLarson, H. J., Jarrett, C., Eckersberger, E., Smith, D. M. D., & Paterson, P. (2014) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.081 · Cited by 2,254
Self-citationMapping vaccine hesitancy-country-specific characteristics of a global phenomenon
Dubé, E., Gagnon, D., Nickels, E., Jeram, S., & Schuster, M. (2014) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.039 · Cited by 544 · cited 3×
“int/immunization/global vaccine action plan/en/ [12] Dube E, Gagnon D, Nickels E, Jeram S, Schuster M.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationValidity and reliability of a survey to identify vaccine-hesitant parents
Opel, D. J., Taylor, J. A., Mangione-Smith, R., Solomon, C., Zhao, C., Catz, S., & Martin, D. (2011) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.115 · Cited by 409
Cited by
The State of Vaccine Confidence 2016: Global Insights Through a 67-Country Survey
Larson, H. J., de Figueiredo, A., Xiahong, Z., Schulz, W. S., Verger, P., Johnston, I. G., Cook, A. R., & Jones, N. S. (2016) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.08.042 · Cited by 1,264
Self-citationde Figueiredo, A., Simas, C., Karafillakis, E., Paterson, P., & Larson, H. J. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31558-0 · Cited by 1,143
Self-citationMartin, L. R., & Petrie, K. J. (2017) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-017-9888-y · Cited by 389
Comparisons of Vaccine Hesitancy across Five Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Wagner, A. L., Masters, N. B., Domek, G. J., Mathew, J. L., Sun, X., Asturias, E. J., Ren, J., Huang, Z., Contreras-Roldan, I. L., Gebremeskel, B., et al. (2019) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines7040155 · Cited by 180
Luk, T. T., Lui, J. H. T., & Wang, M. P. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/39063 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Larson, H. J., Jarrett, C., Schulz, W. S., Chaudhuri, M., Zhou, Y., Dube, E., Schuster, M., MacDonald, N. E., & Wilson, R.
- Venue
- Vaccine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 4165-4175
- ISSN
- 0264-410X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037218209
- Cited by
- 955
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 27.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring vaccine hesitancy: The development of a survey tool. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.037
- The paper
- Larson, H. J., Jarrett, C., Schulz, W. S., Chaudhuri, M., Zhou, Y., Dube, E., Schuster, M., MacDonald, N. E., & Wilson, R. (2015). Measuring vaccine hesitancy: The development of a survey tool. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
