Cited by 1,143Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyMisinformation and Its ImpactsRisk Perception and Management

Mapping global trends in vaccine confidence and investigating barriers to vaccine uptake: a large-scale retrospective temporal modelling study

Open access
de Figueiredo, Alexandre, Simas, Clarissa, Karafillakis, Emilie, Paterson, Pauline, Larson, Heidi J·2020·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence of vaccine delays or refusals due to a lack of trust in the importance, safety, or effectiveness of vaccines, alongside persisting access issues. Although immunisation coverage is reported administratively across the world, no similarly robust monitoring system exists for vaccine confidence. In this study, vaccine confidence was mapped across 149 countries between 2015 and 2019. METHODS: In this large-scale retrospective data-driven analysis, we examined global trends in vaccine confidence using data from 290 surveys done between September, 2015, and December, 2019, across 149 countries, and including 284 381 individuals. We used a Bayesian multinomial logit Gaussian process model to produce estimates of public perceptions towards the safety, importance, and effectiveness of vaccines. Associations between vaccine uptake and a large range of putative drivers of uptake, including vaccine confidence, socioeconomic status, and sources of trust, were determined using univariate Bayesian logistic regressions. Gibbs sampling was used for Bayesian model inference, with 95% Bayesian highest posterior density intervals used to capture uncertainty. FINDINGS: Between November, 2015, and December, 2019, we estimate that confidence in the importance, safety, and effectiveness of vaccines fell in Afghanistan, Indonesia, Pakistan, the Philippines, and South Korea. We found significant increases in respondents strongly disagreeing that vaccines are safe between 2015 and 2019 in six countries: Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Indonesia, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Serbia. We find signs that confidence has improved between 2018 and 2019 in some EU member states, including Finland, France, Ireland, and Italy, with recent losses detected in Poland. Confidence in the importance of vaccines (rather than in their safety or effectiveness) had the strongest univariate association with vaccine uptake compared with other determinants considered. When a link was found between individuals' religious beliefs and uptake, findings indicated that minority religious groups tended to have lower probabilities of uptake. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the largest study of global vaccine confidence to date, allowing for cross-country comparisons and changes over time. Our findings highlight the importance of regular monitoring to detect emerging trends to prompt interventions to build and sustain vaccine confidence. FUNDING: European Commission, Wellcome, and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31558-0

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reaching required vaccination levels should not be assumed given well-documented evidence of vaccine hesitancy across the world, which is often fuelled by online and offline misinformation.

    “Reaching these required vaccination levels should not be assumed given well-documented evidence of vaccine hesitancy across the world 17 , which is often fuelled by online and offline misinformation surrounding the importance, safety or effectiveness of vaccines 18-20 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Larson HJ Jarrett C Eckersberger E Smith DM Paterson P Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global perspective: a systematic review of published literature, 2007–2012 Vaccine 32 2014 2150 2159 24598724
  2. [31]Plummer M JAGS: just another Gibbs sampler. JAGS: a program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing 2003 Technische Universit at Wien Vienna

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Figueiredo, A., Simas, C., Karafillakis, E., Paterson, P., & Larson, H. J.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
Corresponding author
Larson, Heidi J
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
396
Issue
10255
Pages
898-908
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3084350025
Cited by
1,143
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 153 · 2023: 207 · 2022: 273 · 2021: 279 · 2020: 27
FWCI
108.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N014529/1)
  • Wellcome Trust
  • European Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
vaccine confidence, vaccine uptake, vaccine hesitancy, vaccine safety beliefs, vaccine effectiveness perception, religious beliefs and vaccination, socioeconomic status, trust in health information sources
MeSH terms
Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Public Opinion, Retrospective Studies, Vaccines, Global Health, Mass Vaccination, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review