The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: Review of published reviews
Open accessAbstract
When faced with vaccine hesitancy, public health authorities are looking for effective strategies to address this issue. In this paper, the findings of 15 published literature reviews or meta-analysis that have examined the effectiveness of different interventions to reduce vaccine hesitancy and/or to enhance vaccine acceptance are presented and discussed. From the literature, there is no strong evidence to recommend any specific intervention to address vaccine hesitancy/refusal. The reviewed studies included interventions with diverse content and approaches that were implemented in different settings and targeted various populations. Few interventions were directly targeted to vaccine hesitant individuals. Given the paucity of information on effective strategies to address vaccine hesitancy, when interventions are implemented, planning a rigorous evaluation of their impact on vaccine hesitancy/vaccine acceptance will be essential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Webb, T. L., Joseph, J., Yardley, L., & Michie, S. (2010) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1376 · Cited by 2,517
Larson, H. J., Jarrett, C., Eckersberger, E., Smith, D. M. D., & Paterson, P. (2014) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.081 · Cited by 2,254
Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial
Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Richey, S., & Freed, G. L. (2014) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2013-2365 · Cited by 1,300
The Architecture of Provider-Parent Vaccine Discussions at Health Supervision Visits
Opel, D. J., Heritage, J., Taylor, J. A., Mangione-Smith, R., Salas, H. S., DeVere, V., Zhou, C., & Robinson, J. D. (2013) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2013-2037 · Cited by 507
Understanding vaccination resistance: moving beyond risk
Hobson-West, P. (2003) · Health, Risk & Society · doi:10.1080/13698570310001606978 · Cited by 243
Cited by
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in low- and middle-income countries
(2021) · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01454-y · Cited by 1,105
Karafillakis, E., Simas, C., Jarrett, C., Verger, P., Peretti-Watel, P., Dib, F., De Angelis, S., Takacs, J., Ali, K. A., Pastore Celentano, L., et al. (2019) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2018.1564436 · Cited by 328
“This fear was reported by 19% of hesitant HCWs in studies in France (2007–2015)22,74,107 and 23% of hesitant parents in studies in Italy (2007–2014).27,50,75 Concerns about girls being too young were reported by an average of 13% of hesitant study participants23,26,27,29,30,32,35,45,75 and 30% of general study partici…”
BackgroundHealth Communication and Vaccine Hesitancy
Goldstein, S., MacDonald, N. E., & Guirguis, S. (2015) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.042 · Cited by 265
Self-citationAddressing parents’ vaccine concerns: a randomized trial of a social media intervention
Daley, M. F., Narwaney, K. J., Shoup, J. A., Wagner, N. M., & Glanz, J. M. (2018) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.010 · Cited by 164
MacDougall, D. M., Halperin, B. A., MacKinnon-Cameron, D., Li, L., McNeil, S. A., Langley, J. M., & Halperin, S. A. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009062 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Dubé, E., Gagnon, D., & MacDonald, N. E.
- Venue
- Vaccine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 4191-4203
- ISSN
- 0264-410X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017189900
- Cited by
- 647
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 39.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: Review of published reviews. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.041
- The paper
- Dubé, E., Gagnon, D., & MacDonald, N. E. (2015). Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: Review of published reviews. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
