Cited by 328Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchWomen's cancer prevention and management

HPV vaccination in a context of public mistrust and uncertainty: a systematic literature review of determinants of HPV vaccine hesitancy in Europe

Open access
Karafillakis, Emilie, Simas, Clarissa, Jarrett, Caitlin, Verger, Pierre, Peretti-Watel, Patrick, Dib, Fadia, De Angelis, Stefania, Takacs, Judit +3 more·2019·Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

Abstract

Europe is increasingly described as the region in the world with the least confidence in vaccination, and particularly in the safety of vaccines. The aim of this systematic literature review was to gather and summarise all peer-reviewed and grey literature published about determinants of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine hesitancy in Europe. Ten thematic categories were identified across the 103 articles which were included in the review. Participants from European studies most commonly reported issues with the quantity and quality of information available about HPV vaccination; followed by concerns about potential side effects of the vaccine; and mistrust of health authorities, healthcare workers, and new vaccines. Comparative analyses indicated that confidence determinants differed by country and population groups. This evidence supports the need to develop context-specific interventions to improve confidence in HPV vaccination and design community engagement strategies aiming to build public trust.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21645515.2018.1564436

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 132 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [4]European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Rapid literature review on motivating hesitant population groups in Europe to vaccinate. Stockholm, Sweden: ECDC; 2015.
  2. [11]SAGE Report of the SAGE working group on vaccine hesitancy. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2014 10 Report No.
  3. [12]Pope C, Mays N, Jennie P Synthesising qualitative and quantitative health evidence: a guide to methods. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press; 2007.
  4. [68]Camano-Puig R, Sanchis-Martinez MM Human papilloma virus vaccination in teenage girls: a focus group evaluation. Revista de Salud Publica. 2014; 16: 646– 57. 26120751
  5. [79]Abram Z, Tar G Health education of mothers about their girls’ vaccination. 4th world conference on educational sciences. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012; 462012: 5330– 34.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karafillakis, E., Simas, C., Jarrett, C., Verger, P., Peretti-Watel, P., Dib, F., De Angelis, S., Takacs, J., Ali, K. A., Pastore Celentano, L., & Larson, H.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (CH)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Aix Marseille Univ, IRD, AP-HM, SSA, VITROME, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France
  • Vaccine Preventable Disease Programme, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Centre for Social Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
  • European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (SE)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Karafillakis, Emilie
Venue
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Published
2019-02-20
Volume
15
Issue
7-8
Pages
1615-1627
ISSN
  • 2164-5515 (ISSN-L)
  • 2164-554X
OpenAlex
W2910348912
Cited by
328
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 11
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (OCS-2016-0UT-2050-MCTeFo)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
HPV vaccination, vaccine hesitancy, vaccine confidence, vaccine safety concerns, vaccine side effects, determinants of vaccine hesitancy, community participation, Europe
MeSH terms
Vaccination Refusal, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Europe, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Vaccination, Papillomavirus Infections, Uncertainty, Trust, Papillomavirus Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review