Cited by 28Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyWomen's cancer prevention and management

Acceptability of human papillomavirus vaccination among medical students in Mangalore, India

Padmanabha, Nandan, Kini, Jyoti Ramnath, Alwani, Anam Anil, Sardesai, Aashlesha·2019·Vaccine

Abstract

Background The highly prevalent cervical cancer can be prevented through a vaccine. However, the uptake of the Human Papillomavirus vaccine in the general population continues to be low. Medical students, as healthcare providers in the future, would be influential in affecting the community's views and thereby the uptake of the Human Papillomavirus vaccine. Hence, there is a need to promote the right attitude for prompt implementation of this vaccine among medical students. None of the studies in India have so far documented the proportion of vaccinated population among medical students or an intervention strategy to eliminate the barriers to Human Papillomavirus vaccine. Aims and objectives To determine the proportion of vaccinated medical students and the barriers against HPV vaccination among non-vaccinated participants; and to test the efficacy of an information session on the barrier. Methodology Data on barriers against the Human Papillomavirus vaccination was collected through a questionnaire-based survey. The barriers were reassessed after an intervention in the form of training session using audio-visual aids. Results Out of the 263 participants, 46 (18%) had never heard of the vaccine against Human Papillomavirus and only 54 (21%) were vaccinated. Participants thought it was not essential to get vaccinated as they were not sexually active (28%). Lack of information about the vaccine (28%), its access (24%), and high cost (27%) were the other barriers. Following the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.032

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Padmanabha, N., Kini, J. R., Alwani, A. A., & Sardesai, A.
Affiliations
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
37
Issue
9
Pages
1174-1181
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2911456760
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
HPV vaccination, vaccine acceptance, medical students, barriers to vaccination, cervical cancer prevention, vaccine cost, Mangalore
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Education, Medical, Female, Humans, India, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Medical, Vaccination, Papillomavirus Infections, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review