Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Willingness to Recommend Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination among Medical Students in Mysore, India
Open accessAbstract
Context: Approximately 60,000 women in India die annually from cervical cancer. India also has high rates of head and neck cancers (HNCs), with most patients presenting with advanced disease. Uptake of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, which can prevent both cervical cancer and HNCs, is low in India. Methods and Material: Study setting was Government Medical College, Mysore and it was a Cross-sectional study. Between January to March 2018, a web-based self-administered questionnaire was completed by 498 medical students in Mysore, India. Descriptive statistics were conducted using SPSS. Result: Only 8% of female students and no male students were vaccinated against HPV, and most did not feel susceptible to HPV. Male students were more likely than female students to believe that HPV vaccination can encourage youth to become sexually active (35% vs. 15%; p<0.001). Furthermore, knowledge regarding HPV vaccination for preventing HNCs was no higher among 4th versus 1st year medical students. Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs favourable toward HPV vaccination improved with years of study. Conclusion: Medical education that discusses the full range of uses of HPV vaccination for cancer prevention and improves comfort with topics related to adolescent sexuality may increase future provider recommendations.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a cross-sectional survey of 498 medical students in Mysore, India, HPV vaccination uptake was very low and many students lacked knowledge about HPV vaccination for head and neck cancers. Knowledge, attitudes, and willingness to recommend HPV vaccination generally improved with years of medical study, though gender differences persisted.
Key findings
- Only 17 (8%) female students and no male students had been vaccinated against HPV; 96.6% of the total sample reported not receiving the vaccine. Less than one in five students (18.7%) felt susceptible to HPV infection.
- Most students believed cervical cancer is severe (78.1%), preventable (71.5%), HPV is extremely harmful (63.7%), and HPV vaccination is safe (62.4%) and helpful for preventing cervical cancer (76.3%). However, only 35.7% knew HPV vaccination prevents some head and neck cancers, and this knowledge was no higher among 4th- versus 1st-year students.
- Male students were more likely than female students to believe HPV vaccination encourages youth to become sexually active (34.6% vs. 14.6%, p<0.001) and leads to risky sexual behaviour (25.0% vs. 14.6%, p=0.001). Female students were more likely to believe vaccination is helpful for preventing cervical cancer (79.6% vs. 73.5%, p=0.026) and that there is less risk in being vaccinated than having HPV infection (75.2% vs. 66.9%, p=0.017).
- Comparing 1st- vs. 4th-year students, favourable responses increased for perceived susceptibility to HPV (7.0% vs. 37.3%, p<0.001), believing cervical cancer is preventable (57.0% vs. 88.2%, p<0.001), believing HPV vaccination is safe (55.3% vs. 80.9%, p<0.001), believing it helps prevent cervical cancer (66.7% vs. 92.7%, p<0.001), believing men should get the vaccine (35.1% vs. 62.7%, p<0.001), and readiness to accept vaccination (49.1% vs. 70.9%, p=0.001). By 4th year, 97.3% agreed providers should use every opportunity to recommend HPV vaccine, 93.6% intended to recommend it in practice, and 93.6% were comfortable discussing benefits and risks; still, 42% did not know how to bring up the topic with parents and 32% reported discomfort discussing adolescent sexuality.
Methods
- Cross-sectional study conducted at Government Medical College, Mysore, India, from January to March 2018. A convenience sample of first- to fourth-year medical students completed a web-based self-administered questionnaire; 498 students were included in the analysis.
- The questionnaire was adapted from Maharajan et al. (2015), pilot-tested with 20 participants, reviewed by four study investigators and two medical students, and administered in English. It covered demographics, knowledge, attitudes, beliefs about HPV/cervical cancer/head and neck cancers, and willingness to recommend HPV vaccination.
- Data were collected via Qualtrics and analysed in SPSS. Pearson chi-squared tests were used to compare responses by gender and year of medical education, with p<0.05 considered significant.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: the survey was conducted at only one medical college with a non-random sample, so findings may not be generalizable to all medical students in India.
- Stated in the paper: responses were self-reported and therefore vulnerable to social desirability bias.
- Evident from the text/design: the cross-sectional design cannot establish causality or track changes over time, and the convenience sampling and web-based survey may introduce selection or response bias.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 7 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Less than one in five medical students (19%) felt susceptible to HPV infection.
“most did not feel susceptible to HPV”
- Also stated in: § Result · plain
“Nonetheless, less than one in five students of both genders (19%) felt susceptible to HPV.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Result · plain
- Findingown data
72% of medical students believed that cervical cancer is preventable.
“The majority of students of both genders believed that cervical cancer is a severe disease (78%) and preventable (72%), that HPV is extremely harmful (64%), and that the HPV vaccination is safe (62%) and helpful for preventing cervical cancer (76%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Believing that men should get the HPV vaccine was significantly higher among 4th year compared to 1st year medical students (63% vs 35%, p<0.001).
“that men should get the HPV vaccine (35% vs 63%, p<0.001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Female medical students were more likely than male medical students to believe that there is less risk in being vaccinated than having HPV infection (75% vs. 67%, p=0.017).
“Female students were also more likely to believe that there is less risk in being vaccinated than having HPV infection (75% vs. 67%, p=0.017)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Believing that cervical cancer is preventable was significantly higher among 4th year compared to 1st year medical students (88% vs 57%, p<0.001).
“believing that cervical cancer is preventable (57% vs 88%, p<0.001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Believing that HPV vaccination is helpful for preventing cervical cancer was significantly higher among 4th year compared to 1st year medical students (93% vs 67%, p<0.001).
“and helpful for preventing cervical cancer (67% vs 93%, p<0.001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Favourable knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs toward HPV vaccination improved with years of medical study.
“Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs favourable toward HPV vaccination improved with years of study.”
- Also stated in: § Year of Medical Education · plain
“Accurate knowledge and favourable attitudes and beliefs were significantly higher among students with more years of medical education for almost all questions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Year of Medical Education · plain
- Findingnone given
Male medical students were significantly more likely to believe that HPV vaccination could increase sexual activity and risky sexual behaviours.
“Male students were significantly more likely to believe that HPV vaccination could increase sexual activity and risky sexual behaviours.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
32% of 4th year medical students reported discomfort discussing adolescent sexuality with parents.
“32% of 4 th year students still reported discomfort discussing adolescent sexuality with parents”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
64% of medical students believed that HPV is extremely harmful.
“The majority of students of both genders believed that cervical cancer is a severe disease (78%) and preventable (72%), that HPV is extremely harmful (64%), and that the HPV vaccination is safe (62%) and helpful for preventing cervical cancer (76%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Knowledge regarding HPV vaccination for preventing head and neck cancers was no higher among 4th year versus 1st year medical students.
“knowledge regarding HPV vaccination for preventing HNCs was no higher among 4th versus 1st year medical students.”
- Also stated in: § Year of Medical Education · plain
“However, the proportion of students who believed that HPV vaccination would not prevent HNCs was lower among 1 st vs. 4 th year students (6% vs. 22%, p<0.001).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
“A majority of participants agreed that HPV vaccination could prevent cervical cancer but were less certain about its efficacy for the prevention of HNCs, this knowledge did not appear to improve with years of study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Year of Medical Education · plain
- Findingown data
Female medical students were more likely than male medical students to report not wanting to be infected with HPV (85% vs. 76%, p=0.004).
“to report not wanting to be infected with HPV (85% vs. 76%, p=0.004)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The proportion of medical students who reported that they would recommend giving the HPV vaccine to a 9-10 year old girl was significantly higher among 4th year compared to 1st year students (49% vs 31%, p=0.002).
“Comparing 1 st vs. 4 th year students, the proportion of students who reported that they would recommend giving the HPV vaccine to a 9-10 year old girl was significantly higher with years of study (31% vs. 49%, p = 0.002)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Male medical students were more likely than female medical students to believe that HPV vaccination can encourage youth to become sexually active (35% vs. 15%; p<0.001).
“Male students were more likely than female students to believe that HPV vaccination can encourage youth to become sexually active (35% vs. 15%; p<0.001).”
- Also stated in: § Year of Medical Education · plain
“Male students were more likely than female students to believe that vaccinating young people against HPV will encourage them to become sexually active (35% vs. 15%, p<0.001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Year of Medical Education · plain
- Findingown data
Male medical students were more likely than female medical students to believe that vaccinating young people against HPV will lead to risky sexual behaviour (25% vs. 15%, p<0.001).
“or lead to risky sexual behaviour (25% vs. 15%, p<0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were no significant differences by gender for most domains of knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs toward HPV vaccination and cancer prevention.
“There were no significant differences by gender for most domains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
53% of medical students believed that men should get the HPV vaccine.
“and only 53% believed that men should get the HPV vaccine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Perceived susceptibility to HPV infection was significantly higher among 4th year compared to 1st year medical students (37% vs 7%, p<0.001).
“Large significant differences between 1 st vs 4 th year medical students were observed for perceived susceptibility to HPV infection (7% vs 37%, p<0.001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
40% of medical students were not ready to accept the HPV vaccination if offered to them today.
“40% were not ready to accept the HPV vaccination if offered to them today”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
42% of 4th year medical students did not know how to bring up the topic of HPV vaccination with parents.
“42% of 4 th year students did not know how to bring up the topic of HPV vaccination with parents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Female medical students were more likely than male medical students to believe that information on HPV is helpful for deciding whether to be vaccinated (86% vs. 77%, p=0.002).
“to believe that information on HPV is helpful for deciding whether to be vaccinated (86% vs. 77%, p=0.002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The proportion of medical students who believed that HPV vaccination would not prevent head and neck cancers was lower among 1st year compared to 4th year students (6% vs. 22%, p<0.001).
“However, the proportion of students who believed that HPV vaccination would not prevent HNCs was lower among 1 st vs. 4 th year students (6% vs. 22%, p<0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Readiness to accept the HPV vaccine was significantly higher among 4th year compared to 1st year medical students (71% vs 49%, p<0.001).
“and readiness to accept the HPV vaccine (49% vs 71%, p<0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
76% of medical students believed that the HPV vaccination is helpful for preventing cervical cancer.
“The majority of students of both genders believed that cervical cancer is a severe disease (78%) and preventable (72%), that HPV is extremely harmful (64%), and that the HPV vaccination is safe (62%) and helpful for preventing cervical cancer (76%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Believing that HPV vaccination is safe was significantly higher among 4th year compared to 1st year medical students (81% vs 55%, p<0.001).
“that HPV vaccination is safe (55% vs 81%, p<0.001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
62% of medical students believed that the HPV vaccination is safe.
“The majority of students of both genders believed that cervical cancer is a severe disease (78%) and preventable (72%), that HPV is extremely harmful (64%), and that the HPV vaccination is safe (62%) and helpful for preventing cervical cancer (76%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
78% of medical students believed that cervical cancer is a severe disease.
“The majority of students of both genders believed that cervical cancer is a severe disease (78%) and preventable (72%), that HPV is extremely harmful (64%), and that the HPV vaccination is safe (62%) and helpful for preventing cervical cancer (76%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Female medical students were more likely than male medical students to be unsure whether HPV vaccination could prevent head and neck cancers (57% vs. 42%, p<0.001).
“female students were more likely than male students to be unsure (57% vs. 42%, p<0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The proportion of medical students responding that they were unsure declined with years of study.
“Additionally, the proportion of students responding that they were unsure declined with years of study indicating more confidence in responses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
74% of medical students believed that accepting HPV vaccination is a good idea based on their existing knowledge.
“Although most (74%) believed that accepting HPV vaccination is a good idea based on their existing knowledge”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The responses are all self-reported, so the results are vulnerable to social desirability bias.
“Second, the responses are all self-reported, so the results are vulnerable to social desirability bias, with participants answering how they believe would be favourably viewed by investigators rather than how they truly believe or act.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The questionnaire adapted from Maharajan et al. (2015) was validated for internal consistency by conducting a pilot study with 20 participants.
“The questionnaire adapted from Maharajan et al., (2015) was validated for internal consistency by conducting a pilot study with 20 participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The findings of this study are consistent with existing studies demonstrating medical students' limited knowledge and misperceptions about HPV infection and vaccination in India, particularly at the start of medical school.
“These results are consistent with existing studies demonstrating medical students' limited knowledge and misperceptions about HPV infection and vaccination in India, particularly at the start of medical school.[19][20][21][22]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [19]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- May combine two claims. 8
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were significant differences between female and male medical students in the study regarding the benefits of the HPV vaccine and assumptions about the effect of the vaccine on adolescent sexual behaviours.
“There were significant differences between female and male medical students in the study regarding the benefits of the HPV vaccine and assumptions about the effect of the vaccine on adolescent sexual behaviours.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe proportion of medical students responding favourably to willingness to recommend HPV vaccination was significantly higher among 3rd and 4th year students than 1st and 2nd year students for most domains, except knowing how to bring up the topic of HPV vaccination with parents, concern regarding the amount of time needed to discuss HPV vaccination, and preferring to wait until a child is 15-16岁.
“The proportion of students responding favourably was significantly higher among 3 rd and 4 th year students than 1 st and 2 nd year students for most domains, except knowing how to bring up the topic of HPV vaccination with parents, concern regarding the amount of time needed to discuss HPV vaccination, preferring to wait until a child is 15-16 years old before recommending the HPV vaccine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA majority of medical students in the current study thought the HPV vaccine was low risk, but female students were more likely to endorse this view than male students.
“A majority of participants in the current study thought the HPV vaccine was low risk, but female students were more likely to endorse this view than male students”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn this study, very few participants had received the HPV vaccine though most believed that cervical cancer was harmful.
“In this study, very few participants had received the HPV vaccine though most believed that cervical cancer was harmful.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningMale medical students were more likely to believe that the HPV vaccine could prevent certain head and neck cancers, while female students were much more uncertain.
“However, male students were more likely to believe that the HPV vaccine could prevent certain HNCs, while female students were much more uncertain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWillingness to discuss and recommend HPV vaccination was endorsed by the majority of medical students across all domains from the 1st year of medical school and increased to near universal approval by 4th year for believing that providers should use every opportunity to recommend the HPV vaccine (97%), intention to recommend the HPV vaccine in their practice (94%), and comfort discussing benefits,
“Willingness to discuss and recommend HPV vaccination was endorsed by the majority of medical students across all domains from the 1 st year of medical school and increased to near universal approval by 4 th year for believing that providers should use every opportunity to recommend the HPV vaccine (97%), intention to recommend the HPV vaccine in their practice (94%), comfort discussing benefits”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong medical students in Mysore, India, 8% of female students and none of the male students had been vaccinated against HPV.
“Only 8% of female students and no male students were vaccinated against HPV”
- Also stated in: § Result · plain
“Only 17 (8%) female students and none of the male students had been vaccinated against HPV.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Result · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe HPV vaccine is protective for some head, neck, anal and penile cancers.
“The vaccine is also protective for some head, neck, anal and penile cancers.14”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe survey was conducted with only one medical college with a non-random sample of students, so the findings may not be generalizable to all medical students in India.
“First, the survey was conducted with only one medical college with a non-random sample of students, so the findings may not be generalizable to all medical students in India.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenFor construction and content validity, the questionnaire was reviewed by four study investigators and two medical students before data collection.
“For construction and content validity, the questionnaire was reviewed by four study investigators and two medical students before data collection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA doctor's recommendation has been found to increase HPV vaccine uptake.
“A doctor's recommendation has been found to increase HPV vaccine uptake.12”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningMedical education that discusses the full range of uses of HPV vaccination for cancer prevention and improves comfort with topics related to adolescent sexuality may increase future provider recommendations.
“Medical education that discusses the full range of uses of HPV vaccination for cancer prevention and improves comfort with topics related to adolescent sexuality may increase future provider recommendations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningMore emphasis on the effectiveness of HPV vaccination in medical education could help to improve vaccine uptake in India.
“More emphasis on the effectiveness of HPV vaccination in medical education could help to improve vaccine uptake in India.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSeveral vaccines are licensed for use against oncogenic HPV infection, a necessary cause of cervical cancer.
“Several vaccines are licensed for use against oncogenic HPV infection, a necessary cause of cervical cancer.8”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
Understanding medical students' perceptions towards HPV vaccination is crucial to implement cancer prevention programs in India successfully.
“Understanding medical students' perceptions towards HPV vaccination is crucial to implement cancer prevention programs in India successfully.”
The paper relies on this without support.
To date, neither HPV vaccine is included in the Universal Immunisation Program (UIP) in Karnataka, and they are only available as a recommended vaccine from private healthcare providers.
“To date, neither vaccines are included in the Universal Immunisation Program (UIP) in Karnataka, are only available as a recommended vaccine from private healthcare providers.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Sexual health is a stigmatized topic, which is rarely discussed between parents and children in India, and between providers and patients.
“Sexual health is a stigmatized topic, which is rarely discussed between parents and children in India, and between providers and patients.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Uncertainty about HPV susceptibility is overstated
MinorThe discussion says more than two-thirds of participants were unsure whether they were susceptible to HPV, but Table 2 reports 36.3% answering "Do Not Know."
“more than two-thirds were unsure if they were susceptible to HPV infection.”
“4. I am susceptible to HPV infection 0.252 True 17.7% 19.5% 18.7% False 42.0% 47.4% 45.0% Do Not Know 40.3% 33.1% 36.3%”
Conflicting total for students unsure about vaccinating both boys and girls
MinorTable 2 reports 2.4% as the total answering "Do Not Know," while Table 3 reports 24.7% for the same question and sample. The Table 2 gender percentages also support a total near 24.7%, not 2.4%.
“14.I believe that both boys and girls should receive the HPV vaccine 0.211 True 69.0% 67.6% 68.3% False 4.9% 8.8% 7.0% Do Not Know 26.1% 23.5% 2.4%”
“14.I believe that both boys and girls should receive the HPV vaccine 0.000 True 64.0% 67.5% 76.4% 64.5% 68.3% False 0.0% 9.3% 4.9% 13.6% 7.0% Do Not Know 36.0%23.2% 18.7% 21.8% 24.7%”
Cites
de Sanjosé, S., Diaz, M., Castellsagué, X., Clifford, G., Bruni, L., Muñoz, N., & Bosch, F. X. (2007) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70158-5 · Cited by 1,669 · see citing works
Burden of cervical cancer and role of screening in India
Bobdey, S., Sathwara, J., Jain, A., & Balasubramaniam, G. (2016) · Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology · doi:10.4103/0971-5851.195751 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Vaccination against human papillomavirus infection: a new paradigm in cervical cancer control
Franco, E. L., & HARPER, D. (2005) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.016 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Epidemiology of cervical cancer with special focus on India
Aswathy, S., Reshma, J., & Dinesh, A. (2015) · International Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.2147/ijwh.s50001 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Increase in head and neck cancer in younger patients due to human papillomavirus (HPV)
Young, D., Xiao, C. C., Murphy, B., et al. (2015) · Oral Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.03.015 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Rashid, S., Labani, S., & Das, B. C. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166713 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Current status of human papillomavirus vaccination in India's cervical cancer prevention efforts
Sankaranarayanan, R., Basu, P., Kaur, P., Bhaskar, R., Singh, G. B., Denzongpa, P., Grover, R. K., Sebastian, P., Saikia, T., Oswal, K., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30531-5 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Projection of Cancer Incident Cases for India - Till 2026
D'souza, N. D. R., Murthy, N. S., & Aras, R. (2013) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.7.4379 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Swarnapriya, K., Kavitha, D., & Reddy, G. M. M. (2016) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.18.8473 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Awareness about Human Papilloma Virus and its vaccine among medical students
Goel, G., Mehta, S., Rajaram, S., et al. (2013) · Indian Journal of Community Medicine · doi:10.4103/0970-0218.112438 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Hussain, S., Nasare, V., Kumari, M., Sharma, S., Khan, M., Das, B., & Bharadwaj, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112861 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationCervical cancer and the global health agenda: Insights from multiple policy-analysis frameworks
Parkhurst, J. O., & Vulimiri, M. (2013) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2013.850524 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Advancing Cervical Cancer Prevention in India: Implementation Science Priorities
Krishnan, S., Madsen, E., Porterfield, D. S., & Varghese, B. (2013) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0292 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Establishing Baseline Cervical Cancer Screening Coverage — India, 2015–2016
Dyne, E. A. V., Hallowell, B. D., Saraiya, M., Senkomago, V., Patel, S. A., Agrawal, S., Ghosh, A., Saraf, D. S., Mehrotra, R., & Dhillon, P. K. (2019) · MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6801a4 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Cervical cancer screening & HPV vaccination: a comprehensive approach to cervical cancer control.
Basu, P. S., & Chowdhury, D. (2009) · PubMed · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Attitudes Towards Premarital Sex in India: Traditionalism and Cultural Change
Majumdar, C. (2017) · Sexuality & Culture · doi:10.1007/s12119-017-9486-y · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Sexual Disinhibition in Females
Madhivanan, P., Pierre‐Victor, D., Mukherjee, S., et al. (2016) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.015 · Cited by 39
Krupp, K., Marlow, L. A. V., Kielmann, K., et al. (2009) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.10.001 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Maharajan, M. K., Rajiah, K., Num, K. S. F., et al. (2015) · Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.14.5733 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Wong, L. P. (2009) · Sozial- und Präventivmedizin · doi:10.1007/s00038-009-0072-4 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Acceptability of human papillomavirus vaccination among medical students in Mangalore, India
Padmanabha, N., Kini, J. R., Alwani, A. A., & Sardesai, A. (2019) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.032 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Canon, C., Effoe, V., Shetty, V., & Shetty, A. K. (2017) · Journal of Cancer Education · doi:10.1007/s13187-016-0999-0 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Advancing Cervical Cancer Prevention in India: Implementation Science Priorities
Krishnan, S., Madsen, E., Porterfield, D. S., & Varghese, B. (2013) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.18-s2-13 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Tripathy, S., Mohapatra, S., Muthulakshmi, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20150926 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Understanding Indian family life: The gender perspectives
Chowdhury, A., & Patnaik, M. M. (2013) · EXCEL International Journal of Multidisciplinary Management Studies · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Impact of HPV Vaccine Availability on Uptake
Small, S. L., & Patel, D. A. (2012) · The Journal for Nurse Practitioners · doi:10.1016/j.nurpra.2011.06.005 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Family Roles Posing Challenges for Women Leaders in India
Chaudhuri, S., Muduli, A., & Arora, R. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68816-9_2 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Sexual Communication and Attitudes toward Sexual and Reproductive Health of Parent-Adolescent Dyads
Jain, N., & Singhal, M. (2017) · Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health · doi:10.1177/0973134220170402 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Gupta, M., Kaushal, K., Sharma, N., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases · doi:10.4103/jncd.jncd_38_18 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
International Journal of Women's Health
DiBonaventura, M. D., Chandran, A., Hsu, M.-A., & Bushmakin, A. (2020) · International Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.2147/ijwh
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Kaarthigeyan K. Cervical cancer in India and HPV vaccination. Indian journal of medical and paediatric oncology: official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology 2012; 33(1): 7.
- Rosenthal S, Weiss TW, Zimet GD et al. Predictors Srinivas V et al. Int. J. Preven. Curat. Comm. Med. 2020; 6(4) ISSN: 2454-325X DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2454.325X.202015 of HPV vaccine uptake among women aged 19-26: importance of a physician's recommendation. Vaccine 2011; 29(5): 890-895. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Daniel, E. S., Nelson, T., Ramdeen‐Mootoo, G., et al. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.81426 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Among them, 82% of women and 25% of men possessed knowledge about HPV [9].”
Daniel, E. S., Nelson, T., Ramdeen‐Mootoo, G., et al. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2817093/v1
PEKDEMİR, D. G., & Mamuk, R. (2023) · International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy · doi:10.33457/ijhsrp.1307796
- Authors
- Dept. of Community Medicine, M. M. C. A. R. I., & Khan, M.
- Affiliations
- Mysore Medical College (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Khan, Mudassir
- ORCID
- Khan, Mudassir
- Venue
- International Journal of Preventive, Curative & Community Medicine
- Publisher
- Advanced Research Publications
- Published
- 2021-03-05
- Volume
- 06
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 9-18
- ISSN
- 2454-325X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3158465479
- Semantic Scholar
- 45bb699d70af68e4414b5cea6a402de13ae63f92
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Preventive Curative & Community Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- HPV vaccination, human papillomavirus, medical students, knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, vaccine uptake, cervical cancer prevention, provider recommendation, medical education, Mysore
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-16.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-16.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review