Cited by 4Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyWomen's cancer prevention and management

Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Willingness to Recommend Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination among Medical Students in Mysore, India

Open access
Dept. of Community Medicine, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India, Khan, Mudassir·2021·International Journal of Preventive, Curative & Community Medicine

Abstract

Context: Approximately 60,000 women in India die annually from cervical cancer. India also has high rates of head and neck cancers (HNCs), with most patients presenting with advanced disease. Uptake of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, which can prevent both cervical cancer and HNCs, is low in India. Methods and Material: Study setting was Government Medical College, Mysore and it was a Cross-sectional study. Between January to March 2018, a web-based self-administered questionnaire was completed by 498 medical students in Mysore, India. Descriptive statistics were conducted using SPSS. Result: Only 8% of female students and no male students were vaccinated against HPV, and most did not feel susceptible to HPV. Male students were more likely than female students to believe that HPV vaccination can encourage youth to become sexually active (35% vs. 15%; p<0.001). Furthermore, knowledge regarding HPV vaccination for preventing HNCs was no higher among 4th versus 1st year medical students. Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs favourable toward HPV vaccination improved with years of study. Conclusion: Medical education that discusses the full range of uses of HPV vaccination for cancer prevention and improves comfort with topics related to adolescent sexuality may increase future provider recommendations.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a cross-sectional survey of 498 medical students in Mysore, India, HPV vaccination uptake was very low and many students lacked knowledge about HPV vaccination for head and neck cancers. Knowledge, attitudes, and willingness to recommend HPV vaccination generally improved with years of medical study, though gender differences persisted.

Key findings

  • Only 17 (8%) female students and no male students had been vaccinated against HPV; 96.6% of the total sample reported not receiving the vaccine. Less than one in five students (18.7%) felt susceptible to HPV infection.
  • Most students believed cervical cancer is severe (78.1%), preventable (71.5%), HPV is extremely harmful (63.7%), and HPV vaccination is safe (62.4%) and helpful for preventing cervical cancer (76.3%). However, only 35.7% knew HPV vaccination prevents some head and neck cancers, and this knowledge was no higher among 4th- versus 1st-year students.
  • Male students were more likely than female students to believe HPV vaccination encourages youth to become sexually active (34.6% vs. 14.6%, p<0.001) and leads to risky sexual behaviour (25.0% vs. 14.6%, p=0.001). Female students were more likely to believe vaccination is helpful for preventing cervical cancer (79.6% vs. 73.5%, p=0.026) and that there is less risk in being vaccinated than having HPV infection (75.2% vs. 66.9%, p=0.017).
  • Comparing 1st- vs. 4th-year students, favourable responses increased for perceived susceptibility to HPV (7.0% vs. 37.3%, p<0.001), believing cervical cancer is preventable (57.0% vs. 88.2%, p<0.001), believing HPV vaccination is safe (55.3% vs. 80.9%, p<0.001), believing it helps prevent cervical cancer (66.7% vs. 92.7%, p<0.001), believing men should get the vaccine (35.1% vs. 62.7%, p<0.001), and readiness to accept vaccination (49.1% vs. 70.9%, p=0.001). By 4th year, 97.3% agreed providers should use every opportunity to recommend HPV vaccine, 93.6% intended to recommend it in practice, and 93.6% were comfortable discussing benefits and risks; still, 42% did not know how to bring up the topic with parents and 32% reported discomfort discussing adolescent sexuality.

Methods

  • Cross-sectional study conducted at Government Medical College, Mysore, India, from January to March 2018. A convenience sample of first- to fourth-year medical students completed a web-based self-administered questionnaire; 498 students were included in the analysis.
  • The questionnaire was adapted from Maharajan et al. (2015), pilot-tested with 20 participants, reviewed by four study investigators and two medical students, and administered in English. It covered demographics, knowledge, attitudes, beliefs about HPV/cervical cancer/head and neck cancers, and willingness to recommend HPV vaccination.
  • Data were collected via Qualtrics and analysed in SPSS. Pearson chi-squared tests were used to compare responses by gender and year of medical education, with p<0.05 considered significant.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: the survey was conducted at only one medical college with a non-random sample, so findings may not be generalizable to all medical students in India.
  • Stated in the paper: responses were self-reported and therefore vulnerable to social desirability bias.
  • Evident from the text/design: the cross-sectional design cannot establish causality or track changes over time, and the convenience sampling and web-based survey may introduce selection or response bias.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24321/2454.325x.202015

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 7 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Less than one in five medical students (19%) felt susceptible to HPV infection.

    “most did not feel susceptible to HPV”
    • Also stated in: § Result · plain
      “Nonetheless, less than one in five students of both genders (19%) felt susceptible to HPV.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    72% of medical students believed that cervical cancer is preventable.

    “The majority of students of both genders believed that cervical cancer is a severe disease (78%) and preventable (72%), that HPV is extremely harmful (64%), and that the HPV vaccination is safe (62%) and helpful for preventing cervical cancer (76%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Believing that men should get the HPV vaccine was significantly higher among 4th year compared to 1st year medical students (63% vs 35%, p<0.001).

    “that men should get the HPV vaccine (35% vs 63%, p<0.001)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Female medical students were more likely than male medical students to believe that there is less risk in being vaccinated than having HPV infection (75% vs. 67%, p=0.017).

    “Female students were also more likely to believe that there is less risk in being vaccinated than having HPV infection (75% vs. 67%, p=0.017)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Believing that cervical cancer is preventable was significantly higher among 4th year compared to 1st year medical students (88% vs 57%, p<0.001).

    “believing that cervical cancer is preventable (57% vs 88%, p<0.001)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 8
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were significant differences between female and male medical students in the study regarding the benefits of the HPV vaccine and assumptions about the effect of the vaccine on adolescent sexual behaviours.

    “There were significant differences between female and male medical students in the study regarding the benefits of the HPV vaccine and assumptions about the effect of the vaccine on adolescent sexual behaviours.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The proportion of medical students responding favourably to willingness to recommend HPV vaccination was significantly higher among 3rd and 4th year students than 1st and 2nd year students for most domains, except knowing how to bring up the topic of HPV vaccination with parents, concern regarding the amount of time needed to discuss HPV vaccination, and preferring to wait until a child is 15-16岁.

    “The proportion of students responding favourably was significantly higher among 3 rd and 4 th year students than 1 st and 2 nd year students for most domains, except knowing how to bring up the topic of HPV vaccination with parents, concern regarding the amount of time needed to discuss HPV vaccination, preferring to wait until a child is 15-16 years old before recommending the HPV vaccine.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A majority of medical students in the current study thought the HPV vaccine was low risk, but female students were more likely to endorse this view than male students.

    “A majority of participants in the current study thought the HPV vaccine was low risk, but female students were more likely to endorse this view than male students”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In this study, very few participants had received the HPV vaccine though most believed that cervical cancer was harmful.

    “In this study, very few participants had received the HPV vaccine though most believed that cervical cancer was harmful.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Male medical students were more likely to believe that the HPV vaccine could prevent certain head and neck cancers, while female students were much more uncertain.

    “However, male students were more likely to believe that the HPV vaccine could prevent certain HNCs, while female students were much more uncertain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Willingness to discuss and recommend HPV vaccination was endorsed by the majority of medical students across all domains from the 1st year of medical school and increased to near universal approval by 4th year for believing that providers should use every opportunity to recommend the HPV vaccine (97%), intention to recommend the HPV vaccine in their practice (94%), and comfort discussing benefits,

    “Willingness to discuss and recommend HPV vaccination was endorsed by the majority of medical students across all domains from the 1 st year of medical school and increased to near universal approval by 4 th year for believing that providers should use every opportunity to recommend the HPV vaccine (97%), intention to recommend the HPV vaccine in their practice (94%), comfort discussing benefits”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among medical students in Mysore, India, 8% of female students and none of the male students had been vaccinated against HPV.

    “Only 8% of female students and no male students were vaccinated against HPV”
    • Also stated in: § Result · plain
      “Only 17 (8%) female students and none of the male students had been vaccinated against HPV.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The HPV vaccine is protective for some head, neck, anal and penile cancers.

    “The vaccine is also protective for some head, neck, anal and penile cancers.14”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The survey was conducted with only one medical college with a non-random sample of students, so the findings may not be generalizable to all medical students in India.

    “First, the survey was conducted with only one medical college with a non-random sample of students, so the findings may not be generalizable to all medical students in India.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    For construction and content validity, the questionnaire was reviewed by four study investigators and two medical students before data collection.

    “For construction and content validity, the questionnaire was reviewed by four study investigators and two medical students before data collection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A doctor's recommendation has been found to increase HPV vaccine uptake.

    “A doctor's recommendation has been found to increase HPV vaccine uptake.12”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Medical education that discusses the full range of uses of HPV vaccination for cancer prevention and improves comfort with topics related to adolescent sexuality may increase future provider recommendations.

    “Medical education that discusses the full range of uses of HPV vaccination for cancer prevention and improves comfort with topics related to adolescent sexuality may increase future provider recommendations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    More emphasis on the effectiveness of HPV vaccination in medical education could help to improve vaccine uptake in India.

    “More emphasis on the effectiveness of HPV vaccination in medical education could help to improve vaccine uptake in India.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Several vaccines are licensed for use against oncogenic HPV infection, a necessary cause of cervical cancer.

    “Several vaccines are licensed for use against oncogenic HPV infection, a necessary cause of cervical cancer.8”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

14 of 14
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Understanding medical students' perceptions towards HPV vaccination is crucial to implement cancer prevention programs in India successfully.

    “Understanding medical students' perceptions towards HPV vaccination is crucial to implement cancer prevention programs in India successfully.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    To date, neither HPV vaccine is included in the Universal Immunisation Program (UIP) in Karnataka, and they are only available as a recommended vaccine from private healthcare providers.

    “To date, neither vaccines are included in the Universal Immunisation Program (UIP) in Karnataka, are only available as a recommended vaccine from private healthcare providers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Sexual health is a stigmatized topic, which is rarely discussed between parents and children in India, and between providers and patients.

    “Sexual health is a stigmatized topic, which is rarely discussed between parents and children in India, and between providers and patients.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Uncertainty about HPV susceptibility is overstated

    Minor

    The discussion says more than two-thirds of participants were unsure whether they were susceptible to HPV, but Table 2 reports 36.3% answering "Do Not Know."

  • Conflicting total for students unsure about vaccinating both boys and girls

    Minor

    Table 2 reports 2.4% as the total answering "Do Not Know," while Table 3 reports 24.7% for the same question and sample. The Table 2 gender percentages also support a total near 24.7%, not 2.4%.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kaarthigeyan K. Cervical cancer in India and HPV vaccination. Indian journal of medical and paediatric oncology: official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology 2012; 33(1): 7.
  2. Rosenthal S, Weiss TW, Zimet GD et al. Predictors Srinivas V et al. Int. J. Preven. Curat. Comm. Med. 2020; 6(4) ISSN: 2454-325X DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/2454.325X.202015 of HPV vaccine uptake among women aged 19-26: importance of a physician's recommendation. Vaccine 2011; 29(5): 890-895. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dept. of Community Medicine, M. M. C. A. R. I., & Khan, M.
Affiliations
Mysore Medical College (IN)
Corresponding author
Khan, Mudassir
Venue
International Journal of Preventive, Curative & Community Medicine
Published
2021-03-05
Volume
06
Issue
04
Pages
9-18
ISSN
2454-325X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3158465479
Cited by
4
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Preventive Curative & Community Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
HPV vaccination, human papillomavirus, medical students, knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, vaccine uptake, cervical cancer prevention, provider recommendation, medical education, Mysore

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-16.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-16.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review