Cited by 58Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyWomen's cancer prevention and management

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine introduction in Sikkim state: Best practices from the first statewide multiple-age cohort HPV vaccine introduction in India–2018–2019

Open access
Ahmed, Danish, VanderEnde, Kristin, Harvey, Pauline, Bhatnagar, Pankaj, Kaur, Nitasha, Roy, Subhendu, Singh, Neelam, Denzongpa, Phumzay +2 more·2022·Vaccine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is a leading cause of cancer-associated mortality among women in India, with 96,922 new cases and 60,078 deaths each year, almost one-fifth of the global burden. In 2018, Sikkim state in India introduced human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for 9-13-year-old girls, primarily through school-based vaccination, targeting approximately 25,000 girls. We documented the program's decision-making and implementation processes. METHODS: We conducted a post-introduction evaluation in 2019, concurrent with the second dose campaign, by interviewing key stakeholders (state, district, and local level), reviewing planning documents, and observing cold chain sites in two purposefully-sampled community areas in each of the four districts of Sikkim. Using standard questionnaires, we interviewed health and education officials, school personnel, health workers, community leaders, and age-eligible girls on program decision-making, planning, training, vaccine delivery, logistics, and communication. RESULTS: We conducted 279 interviews and 29 observations in eight community areas across four districts of Sikkim. Based on reported administrative data, Sikkim achieved >95% HPV vaccination coverage among targeted girls for both doses via two campaigns; no severe adverse events were reported. HPV vaccination was well accepted by all stakeholders; minimal refusal was reported. Factors identified for successful vaccine introduction included strong political commitment, statewide mandatory school enrollment, collaboration between health and education departments at all levels, and robust social mobilization strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Sikkim successfully introduced the HPV vaccine to multiple-age cohorts of girls via school-based vaccination, demonstrating a model that could be replicated in other regions in India or similar low- and middle-income country settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.024

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few studies have specifically examined vaccine acceptability in adult women ages 18-26, who are vaccine-eligible but too old to be reached through traditional, school-based HPV vaccine campaigns.

    “Few studies have specifically examined vaccine acceptability in adult women ages 18–26, who are vaccine-eligible but too old to be reached through traditional, school-based HPV vaccine campaigns [20].”

    From Acceptability of HPV vaccination for cervical cancer prevention amongst emerging adult women in rural Mysore, India: a mixed-methods study (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Background (page unavailable) says Sikkim’s school-based HPV campaign targeted girls aged 9–13, supporting the point that women aged 18–26 were outside that campaign’s target group. The paper does not establish that few studies examine vaccine acceptability in women aged 18–26, or address their vaccine eligibility. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Out-of-school girls often come from marginalized or tribal populations and remain underrepresented in HPV vaccination, echoing equity challenges across LMICs.

    “Out-of-school girls often come from marginalized or tribal populations, which remain underrepresented, echoing equity challenges seen across LMICs56.”

    From Barriers to HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in India: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Results (Vaccine delivery and coverage; page unavailable) report that tracking out-of-school girls at sub-district level was lacking, supporting a concern about reaching them. The paper does not say that these girls often come from marginalized or tribal populations, establish that they were underrepresented in vaccination, or document the claimed equity pattern across LMICs. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • State-level HPV vaccination programmes in Punjab and Sikkim provide practical models for effective implementation among school-going girls, supported by mandatory school enrolment, integration of health and education departments, comprehensive training, and strong community engagement.

    “In India, the state-level HPV vaccination programmes, particularly from Punjab and Sikkim, provide practical models for effective implementation, among the school-going girls55, supported by mandatory school enrolment, integration of health and education departments, comprehensive training, and strong community engagement56.”

    From Barriers to HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in India: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [56]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [2]Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2018; 68: 394– 424. 30207593
  2. [3]Bobdey S, Sathwara J, Jain A, Balasubramaniam G. Burden of cervical cancer and role of screening in India. Ind J Med Paediatr Oncol: Off J Ind Soc Med Paediatr Oncol 2016; 37(04): 278– 85. PMC5234166 28144096
  3. [4]WHO position on HPV vaccines. Vaccine 2009; 27: 7236– 7. 19450645
  4. [5]Human papillomavirus vaccines. WHO position paper, May 2017-Recommendations. Vaccine 2017; 35: 5753– 5. 28596091
  5. [8]Chatterjee S, Chattopadhyay A, Samanta L, Panigrahi P. HPV and Cervical Cancer Epidemiology - Current Status of HPV Vaccination in India. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prevent: APJCP 2016; 17: 3663– 73. 27644600
  6. [10]Dorji T, Tshomo U, Phuntsho S, Tamang TD, Tshokey T, Baussano I, Introduction of a National HPV vaccination program into Bhutan. Vaccine 2015; 33(31): 3726– 30. 26057136
  7. [13]LaMontagne DS, Bloem PJN, Brotherton JML, Gallagher KE, Badiane O, Ndiaye C. Progress in HPV vaccination in low- and lower-middle-income countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstetr: Off Organ Int Federat Gynaecol Obstetr 2017; 138(Suppl 1): 7– 14. 28691329
  8. [14]Torres-Rueda S, Rulisa S, Burchett HED, Mivumbi NV, Mounier-Jack S. HPV vaccine introduction in Rwanda: Impacts on the broader health system. Sexual Reprod Healthcare: Off J Swedish Associat Midwives 2016; 7: 46– 51. 26826045
  9. [15]Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Creswell John W Sage 320 £29 0761924426 0761924426 [Formula: see text]. Nurse researcher. 2004; 12: 82– 3. 28718745
  10. [16]Human papillomavirus vaccines. WHO position paper, October 2014. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2014; 89: 465– 91. 25346960
  11. [19]Levin A, Wang SA, Levin C, Tsu V, Hutubessy R. Costs of introducing and delivering HPV vaccines in low and lower middle income countries: inputs for GAVI policy on introduction grant support to countries. PloS one. 2014; 9: e101114. 24968002 PMC4072768
  12. [20]Hutubessy R, Levin A, Wang S, Morgan W, Ally M, John T, A case study using the United Republic of Tanzania: costing nationwide HPV vaccine delivery using the WHO Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control Costing Tool. BMC Med 2012; 10(1). 10.1186/1741-7015-10-136. PMC3520749 23146319 · DOI
  13. [21]Levin CE, Van Minh H, Odaga J, Rout SS, Ngoc DNT, Menezes L, Delivery cost of human papillomavirus vaccination of young adolescent girls in Peru, Uganda and Viet Nam. Bull World Health Organ 2013; 91(8): 585– 92. 23940406 PMC3738308
  14. [22]Gallagher KE, Howard N, Kabakama S, Mounier-Jack S, Griffiths UK, Feletto M, Lessons learnt from human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in 45 low- and middle-income countries. PLoS One 2017; 12(6): e0177773. 28575074 PMC5456063
  15. [23]Howard N, Gallagher KE, Mounier-Jack S, Burchett HED, Kabakama S, LaMontagne DS, What works for human papillomavirus vaccine introduction in low and middle-income countries? Papillomavirus Res (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2017; 4: 22– 5. 29179865 PMC5710981
  16. [24]LaMontagne DS, Barge S, Le NT, Mugisha E, Penny M, Gandhi S, Human papillomavirus vaccine delivery strategies that achieved high coverage in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ 2011; 89(11): 821– 30. 22084528 PMC3209730
  17. [25]Foss HS, Oldervoll A, Fretheim A, Glenton C, Lewin S. Communication around HPV vaccination for adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping overview of systematic reviews. Systemat Rev 2019; 8: 190. PMC6670236 31370886
  18. [26]Santhanes D, Wong CP, Yap YY, San SP, Chaiyakunapruk N, Khan TM. Factors involved in human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine hesitancy among women in the South-East Asian Region (SEAR) and Western Pacific Region (WPR): A scoping review. Hum Vacc Immunother 2018; 14(1): 124– 33. PMC5791566 28933635

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmed, D., VanderEnde, K., Harvey, P., Bhatnagar, P., Kaur, N., Roy, S., Singh, N., Denzongpa, P., Haldar, P., & Loharikar, A.
Affiliations
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Government of Sikkim (IN)
  • Government of India (IN)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ahmed, Danish
  • Loharikar, Anagha
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
40
Pages
A17-A25
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3193313864
Cited by
58
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • World Health Organization
  • UNICEF
  • Indian Council of Medical Research
  • Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
HPV vaccine, school-based vaccination, cervical cancer prevention, adolescent girls, vaccine rollout, cold chain, vaccine logistics, social mobilization, political commitment, health and education collaboration, vaccine acceptance, Sikkim
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Child, Female, Humans, India, Sikkim, Vaccination, Immunization Programs, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Alphapapillomavirus, Papillomavirus Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review