Cited by 121Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyImmune responses and vaccinationsGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Modeling the impact of vaccination for the immunization Agenda 2030: Deaths averted due to vaccination against 14 pathogens in 194 countries from 2021 to 2030

Open access
Carter, Austin, Msemburi, William, Sim, So Yoon, Gaythorpe, Katy A.M., Lambach, Philipp, Lindstrand, Ann, Hutubessy, Raymond·2024·Vaccine

Abstract

Background The Immunization Agenda 2030 (IA2030) Impact Goal 1.1. aims to reduce the number of future deaths averted through immunization in the next decade. To estimate the potential impact of the aspirational coverage targets for IA2030, we developed an analytical framework and estimated the number of deaths averted due to an ambitious vaccination coverage scenario from 2021 to 2030 in 194 countries. Method A demographic model was used to determine annual age-specific mortality estimates associated with vaccine coverage rates. For ten pathogens (Hepatitis B virus, Haemophilus influenzae type B, human papillomavirus, Japanese encephalitis, measles, Neisseria meningitidis serogroup A, Streptococcus pneumoniae, rotavirus, rubella, yellow fever), we derived single measures of country-, age-, and pathogen-specific relative risk of deaths conditional upon coverage rates, leveraging the data from 18 modeling groups as part of the Vaccine Impact Model Consortium (VIMC) for 110 countries. We used a logistic regression model to extrapolate the relative risk estimates to countries that were not modeled by VIMC. For four pathogens (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and tuberculosis), we used estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study and existing literature on vaccine efficacy. A future scenario defining years of vaccine introduction and scale-up needed to reach aspirational targets was developed as an input to estimate the long-term impact of vaccination taking place from 202…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.07.033

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carter, A., Msemburi, W., Sim, S. Y., Gaythorpe, K. A. M., Lambach, P., Lindstrand, A., & Hutubessy, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Carter, Austin
  • Sim, So Yoon
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
42
Pages
S28-S37
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385455710
Cited by
121
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6
FWCI
30.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
Immunization Agenda 2030, mortality averted, vaccination coverage, measles, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b, human papillomavirus, Japanese encephalitis, Neisseria meningitidis serogroup A, Streptococcus pneumoniae, rotavirus, rubella, yellow fever, tuberculosis, relative risk of death, vaccine impact
MeSH terms
Global Burden of Disease, Vaccination Coverage, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Vaccination, Vaccines, Global Health, Immunization Programs, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review