Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Muscle on a chip: In vitro contractility assays for smooth and striated muscle

Open access
Grosberg, Anna, Nesmith, Alexander P., Goss, Josue A., Brigham, Mark D., McCain, Megan L., Parker, Kevin Kit·2012·Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods

Abstract

Introduction To evaluate the viability of a muscle tissue, it is essential to measure the tissue’s contractile performance as well as to control its structure. Accurate contractility data can aid in development of more effective and safer drugs. This can be accomplished with a robust in vitro contractility assay applicable to various types of muscle tissue. Methods The devices developed in this work were based on the muscular thin film (MTF) technology, in which an elastic film is manufactured with a 2D engineered muscle tissue on one side. The tissue template is made by patterning extracellular matrix with microcontact printing. When muscle cells are seeded on the film, they self-organize with respect to the geometric cues in the matrix to form a tissue. Results Several assays based on the “MTF on a chip” technology are demonstrated. One such assay incorporates the contractility assay with striated muscle into a fluidic channel. Another assay platform incorporates the MTFs in a multi-well plate, which is compatible with automated data collection and analysis. Finally, we demonstrate the possibility of analyzing contractility of both striated and smooth muscle simultaneously on the same chip. Discussion In this work, we assembled an ensemble of contractility assays for striated and smooth muscle based on muscular thin films. Our results suggest an improvement over current methods and an alternative to isolated tissue preparations. Our technology is amenable to both primary harvests cells and cell lines, as well as both human and animal tissues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vascn.2012.04.001

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Grosberg, A., Nesmith, A. P., Goss, J. A., Brigham, M. D., McCain, M. L., & Parker, K. K.
Venue
Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
126-135
ISSN
1056-8719 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116911631
Cited by
176
References
4
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Muscle on a chip: In vitro contractility assays for smooth and striated muscle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.vascn.2012.04.001
The paper
Grosberg, A., Nesmith, A. P., Goss, J. A., Brigham, M. D., McCain, M. L., & Parker, K. K. (2012). Muscle on a chip: In vitro contractility assays for smooth and striated muscle. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2012.04.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.