Cited by 295Traffic Prediction and Management TechniquesAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyTraffic control and management

Deep learning models for traffic flow prediction in autonomous vehicles: a review, solutions, and challenges

Miglani, Arzoo, Kumar, Neeraj·2019·Vehicular Communications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vehcom.2019.100184

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miglani, A., & Kumar, N.
Affiliations
Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Miglani, Arzoo
  • Kumar, Neeraj
Venue
Vehicular Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
20
Pages
100184
ISSN
2214-2096 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2975262648
Cited by
295
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 34
FWCI
19.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Vehicular Communications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
Keywords
traffic flow prediction, autonomous vehicles, deep learning models, smart transportation, vehicle decision-making, spatio-temporal data, model comparison, adaptive machine learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review