Cited by 23Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesTraffic control and management

FedTSE: Low-Cost Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserved Traffic State Estimation in IoV

Yuan, Xiaoming, Chen, Jiahui, Zhang, Ning, Zhu, Chunsheng, Ye, Qiang, Shen, Xuemin Sherman·2022·IEEE INFOCOM 2022 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS)

Abstract

Traffic state estimation (TSE) is an important aspect of the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) for road path planning and better driving experience. In IoV, with the support of edge intelligence, real-time traffic data can be processed by edge computing (EC) servers for informed decision-making. However, collecting trajectory information from vehicles in a centralized manner may increase transmission delay and cause driver privacy leakage problems. In this paper, we firstly propose a federated learning (FL) framework for TSE, named FedTSE, with privacy preservation by jointly considering TSE accuracy, model computation, and transmission cost. Then, a TSE model is designed based on the long short-term memory (LSTM) as the local training model for joint prediction of vehicular speed and traffic flow. Considering the resource limitation of computation/communication, we further propose a deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based algorithm for model parameter uploading/downloading decisions to improve the estimation accuracy of local models and balance the tradeoff between computation and communication cost. Simulation results show the proposed FedTSE achieves a lower cost and higher prediction training accuracy in TSE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/infocomwkshps54753.2022.9798018

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yuan, X., Chen, J., Zhang, N., Zhu, C., Ye, Q., & Shen, X. S.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (CN)
  • University of Windsor (CA)
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Venue
IEEE INFOCOM 2022 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-05-02
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4283219240
Cited by
22
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  • Aeronautical Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
Keywords
federated learning, traffic state estimation, Internet of Vehicles, edge computing, traffic flow prediction, LSTM, deep reinforcement learning, computation-communication trade-off

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review