Characterizing the microbiota across the gastrointestinal tract of a Brazilian Nelore steer
Abstract
The gastrointestinal tracts (GIT) of herbivores harbor dense and diverse microbiota that has beneficial interactions with the host, particularly for agriculturally relevant animals like ruminants such as cattle. When assessing ruminant health, microbiological indicators are often derived from the rumen or feces. However, it is probable that ruminal and fecal microbiota do not reflect the microbial communities within the GIT of ruminants. To test this, we investigated the compartments of the GIT from a Brazilian Nelore steer and performed a 16S rRNA pyrosequencing analysis on the collected samples. Our results showed high intra-individual variation, with samples clustering according to their location in the GIT including the forestomach, small intestine, and large intestine. Although sequences related to the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes predominated all samples, there was a remarkable variation at the family level. Comparisons between the microbiota in the rumen, feces, and other GIT components showed distinct differences in microbial community. This work is the first intensive non-culture based GIT microbiota analysis for any ruminant and provides a framework for understanding how host microbiota impact the health of bovines.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
From the ileum onwards, including caecum, colon and feces, favorable fermentation conditions are present again and microbial density and phylogenetic diversity increase to a level comparable to that of the rumen.
“From the ileum onwards, including caecum, colon and feces, favorable fermentation conditions are present again and microbial density and phylogenetic diversity increase to a level comparable to that of the rumen (Frey et al., 2010; De Oliveira et al., 2013; Popova et al., 2017; He et al., 2018; Yeoman et al., 2018).”
From Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: past, present, and future (2018) · cites this paper as De Oliveira et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 184
- Authors
- de Oliveira, M. N. V., Jewell, K. A., Freitas, F. S., Benjamin, L. A., Tótola, M. R., Borges, A. C., Moraes, C. A., & Suen, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Suen, Garret
- Venue
- Veterinary Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 307-314
- ISSN
- 0378-1135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062875666
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 23.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Veterinary Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- CAPES
- CNPq Brazilian
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- gut microbiota, Nelore cattle, rumen microbiota, fecal microbiota, forestomach, small intestine, large intestine, 16S rRNA pyrosequencing, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, within-person variability, cattle health
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bacteria, Brazil, Cattle, DNA, Bacterial, Feces, Male, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Gastrointestinal Tract, Biodiversity, Microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review