Cited by 184Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyGut microbiota and healthAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Characterizing the microbiota across the gastrointestinal tract of a Brazilian Nelore steer

de Oliveira, Marcelo Nagem Valério, Jewell, Kelsea A., Freitas, Fernanda S., Benjamin, Laércio A., Tótola, Marcos R., Borges, Arnaldo C., Moraes, Célia A., Suen, Garret·2013·Veterinary Microbiology

Abstract

The gastrointestinal tracts (GIT) of herbivores harbor dense and diverse microbiota that has beneficial interactions with the host, particularly for agriculturally relevant animals like ruminants such as cattle. When assessing ruminant health, microbiological indicators are often derived from the rumen or feces. However, it is probable that ruminal and fecal microbiota do not reflect the microbial communities within the GIT of ruminants. To test this, we investigated the compartments of the GIT from a Brazilian Nelore steer and performed a 16S rRNA pyrosequencing analysis on the collected samples. Our results showed high intra-individual variation, with samples clustering according to their location in the GIT including the forestomach, small intestine, and large intestine. Although sequences related to the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes predominated all samples, there was a remarkable variation at the family level. Comparisons between the microbiota in the rumen, feces, and other GIT components showed distinct differences in microbial community. This work is the first intensive non-culture based GIT microbiota analysis for any ruminant and provides a framework for understanding how host microbiota impact the health of bovines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.02.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From the ileum onwards, including caecum, colon and feces, favorable fermentation conditions are present again and microbial density and phylogenetic diversity increase to a level comparable to that of the rumen.

    “From the ileum onwards, including caecum, colon and feces, favorable fermentation conditions are present again and microbial density and phylogenetic diversity increase to a level comparable to that of the rumen (Frey et al., 2010; De Oliveira et al., 2013; Popova et al., 2017; He et al., 2018; Yeoman et al., 2018).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 184

Authors
de Oliveira, M. N. V., Jewell, K. A., Freitas, F. S., Benjamin, L. A., Tótola, M. R., Borges, A. C., Moraes, C. A., & Suen, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR)
Corresponding author
Suen, Garret
Venue
Veterinary Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
164
Issue
3-4
Pages
307-314
ISSN
0378-1135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062875666
Cited by
184
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
FWCI
23.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • CAPES
  • CNPq Brazilian
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
gut microbiota, Nelore cattle, rumen microbiota, fecal microbiota, forestomach, small intestine, large intestine, 16S rRNA pyrosequencing, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, within-person variability, cattle health
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteria, Brazil, Cattle, DNA, Bacterial, Feces, Male, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Gastrointestinal Tract, Biodiversity, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review