Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: past, present, and future
Open accessAbstract
The rumen is a complex ecosystem composed of anaerobic bacteria, protozoa, fungi, methanogenic archaea and phages. These microbes interact closely to breakdown plant material that cannot be digested by humans, whilst providing metabolic energy to the host and, in the case of archaea, producing methane. Consequently, ruminants produce meat and milk, which are rich in high-quality protein, vitamins and minerals, and therefore contribute to food security. As the world population is predicted to reach approximately 9.7 billion by 2050, an increase in ruminant production to satisfy global protein demand is necessary, despite limited land availability, and whilst ensuring environmental impact is minimized. Although challenging, these goals can be met, but depend on our understanding of the rumen microbiome. Attempts to manipulate the rumen microbiome to benefit global agricultural challenges have been ongoing for decades with limited success, mostly due to the lack of a detailed understanding of this microbiome and our limited ability to culture most of these microbes outside the rumen. The potential to manipulate the rumen microbiome and meet global livestock challenges through animal breeding and introduction of dietary interventions during early life have recently emerged as promising new technologies. Our inability to phenotype ruminants in a high-throughput manner has also hampered progress, although the recent increase in "omic" data may allow further development of mathematical models and rumen microbial gene biomarkers as proxies. Advances in computational tools, high-throughput sequencing technologies and cultivation-independent "omics" approaches continue to revolutionize our understanding of the rumen microbiome. This will ultimately provide the knowledge framework needed to solve current and future ruminant livestock challenges.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that understanding and manipulating the rumen microbiome is central to meeting global livestock challenges, including increasing ruminant production while reducing environmental impact. It surveys past, present, and future approaches across rumen microbes, diet, host genetics, early-life interventions, biomarkers, modeling, and omics technologies.
Key findings
- Global demand pressures are large: the world population is predicted to reach approximately 9.7 billion by 2050, total agricultural production may need to be 60% higher than in 2005, and global meat and milk production may need to increase by 76% and 63%, respectively.
- Ruminant livestock production is estimated to account for approximately 14% of anthropogenic methane, and around 2–8% of dietary energy can be lost to methane production, with values as high as 12% for low-quality feeds; 3-nitrooxypropanol has been shown to reduce methane emissions by up to 30%, but animal production benefits are modest.
- A global comparison of 742 rumen samples across 32 species found 30 of the most abundant bacterial groups in over 90% of samples, with *Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii* and *Methanobrevibacter ruminantium* in nearly all samples and accounting for 74% of archaea; diet was concluded to be the main driver of rumen microbiome composition.
- Host genetics also influences the rumen microbiome: 22 bacterial OTUs showed heritability estimates of 0.7 or greater in dairy cattle and were correlated with traits such as dry matter intake and residual feed intake; early-life dietary interventions and microbiome gene biomarkers are highlighted as promising but not yet fully validated.
Methods
- Narrative review/synthesis of published literature on the rumen microbiome, global agricultural challenges, dietary interventions, host genomics, lower gastrointestinal tract microbiomes, biomarkers, mathematical modeling, and omics technologies.
- The paper draws on cited studies, comparative datasets, and summary tables, including examples of dietary interventions and potential gene biomarkers for feed efficiency and methane production.
- No systematic review protocol, search strategy, or primary experimental dataset is reported in the paper.
Limitations
- The paper states that the rumen microbiome remains poorly understood, most rumen microbes are difficult to culture outside the rumen, and high-throughput phenotyping of ruminants has been limited.
- It notes that metataxonomic data are highly variable across studies due to differences in DNA extraction, primers, sequencing, and computational analysis, and that consensus gene biomarkers for residual feed intake and methane output are lacking across datasets.
- As evident from the text, this is a narrative review rather than a primary study, so its conclusions depend on synthesis of cited literature and do not provide new experimental validation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 248 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
No consensus of other genes across the three published datasets was found.
“Consensus of other genes across the three published datasets were not found (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Genes involved in amino acid metabolism were less abundant in feed efficient animals.
“Microbial gene correlations with RFI, data from Shabat et al. (2016) and Li and Guan (2017) showed some consensus as both showed that genes involved in amino acid metabolism were less abundant in feed efficient animals (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shabat et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Li and Guan, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
Genes correlating to methane emissions show very little consensus amongst the five papers investigated.
“Likewise, genes correlating to methane emissions show very little consensus amongst the five papers investigated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In four datasets, the methyl coenzyme reductase enzyme showed the most correlation to methane.
“Nevertheless, in four datasets the methyl coenzyme reductase enzyme, which is involved in the last step of the hydrogenotrophic methane pathway (Figure 1), showed the most correlation to methane.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
A better understanding of the roles played by the constituent microbes is central to the development of advanced methods to manipulate the rumen microbiome in a manner that improves ruminant production whilst reducing environmental impact.
“A better understanding of the roles played by the constituent microbes is central to the development of advanced methods to manipulate the rumen microbiome in a manner that improves ruminant production whilst reducing environmental impact (Yáñez-Ruiz et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yáñez-Ruiz et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Methanogenesis serves an important purpose of elimination fermentative hydrogen from the rumen.
“it serves an important purpose of elimination fermentative hydrogen from the rumen (Wright and Klieve, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wright and Klieve, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The rumen microbiome is central to addressing the grand challenges facing agriculture globally.
“In summary, the rumen microbiome is central to addressing the grand challenges facing agriculture globally.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Defaunation reduces methane output by approximately 11%.
“protozoa have been linked to methanogenesis as defaunation reduces methane output by approximately 11% (Hegarty, 1999; Morgavi et al., 2010; Newbold et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Some rumen protozoa (Epidinium, Polyplastron and Entodinium spp.) possess fibrolytic activity.
“This confirmed the original data of Williams and Coleman (1992) that some of the rumen protozoa (i.e., Epidinium, Polyplastron and Entodinium spp.) possess fibrolytic activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Williams and Coleman, 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Removal of protozoa from the rumen causes a decrease in organic matter degradation, especially of neutral and acid detergent fiber.
“Based on their analysis, Newbold and colleagues found evidence that the removal of protozoa from the rumen caused a decrease in organic matter degradation, especially of neutral and acid detergent fiber.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Newbold et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) reduces methane emissions by up to 30%.
“3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) has been shown to reduce methane emissions by up to 30% (Hristov et al., 2015; Jayanegara et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The rumen microbiomes of Hawaiian goats are tolerant to L. leucocephala.
“The rumen microbiomes of Hawaiian goats were shown to be tolerant to L. leucocephala (Jones and Megarrity, 1986)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones and Megarrity, 1986
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Ruminants excrete approximately 70% of ingested N.
“ruminants excrete approximately 70% of ingested N (Macrae and Ulyatt, 1974; Dewhurst et al., 1996; Edwards et al., 2008; Kingston-Smith et al., 2008, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Methylotrophic methanogens and their functionality are highly enriched in young ruminants whilst being less abundant and showing decreased functionality in mature animals.
“Recently, methylotrophic methanogens and their functionality were found to be highly enriched in young ruminants whilst being less abundant and showing decreased functionality in mature animals (Friedman et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friedman et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The rumen microbiome is pivotal to nitrogen use efficiency due to its role in proteolysis and catabolism of amino acids, resulting in microbial N, which contributes 60-90% of protein absorbed at the duodenum.
“The rumen microbiome is also pivotal to nitrogen (N) use efficiency due to its role in proteolysis and catabolism of amino acids, resulting in microbial N, which contributes 60–90% of protein absorbed at the duodenum (Wallace et al., 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wallace et al., 1997 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
S. jonesii is now used as an inoculum in many tropical countries as means of counteracting DHP toxicity.
“S. jonesii is now used as an inoculum in many tropical countries as means of counteracting DHP toxicity (Wallace, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wallace, 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A meta-analysis of all available animal data following supplementation with 3-NOP only shows modest increases in animal production.
“However, a meta-analysis of all available animal data following supplementation with 3-NOP only shows modest increases in animal production, possibly due to decreased volatile fatty acid (VFA) produced from breakdown of cellulose and increased H2 production; both processes requiring energy input (Jayanegara et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jayanegara et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The composition of the rumen microbiome is mainly driven by diet.
“This study also concluded that the composition of the rumen microbiome was mainly driven by the diet (Henderson et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Henderson et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The biofilm phenotype enables effective hydrolysis of plant material within the rumen by concentrating digestive enzymes within the EPS in proximity to the substrate.
“The biofilm phenotype has many advantages, including the concentration of digestive enzymes within the EPS in proximity to the substrate, an arrangement that enables effective hydrolysis of plant material within the rumen (Minato et al., 1966; Wolin et al., 1997; Michalet-Doreau et al., 2001; Leng, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Feeding red clover to ruminants results in increased nitrogen efficiency due to the enzyme polyphenol oxidase (PPO).
“Feeding red clover to ruminants results in increased nitrogen efficiency due to the fact that it possesses the enzyme polyphenol oxidase (PPO; Broderick, 1995; Lee, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Rumen protozoal hydrogenosomes produce H2, which serves as a substrate for methanogens to reduce CO2 to methane via the hydrogenotrophic pathway.
“rumen protozoal hydrogenosomes produce H2, which then serves as a substrate for methanogens to reduce CO2 to methane via the hydrogenotrophic pathway (Vogels et al., 1980; Belanche et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The rumen microbiome is dominated by microbes existing within biofilms.
“the rumen microbiome is dominated by microbes existing within biofilms, which are defined as a consortia of microbes attached to a surface, encased in a self-produced extracellular polymeric matrix (EPS; Figure 3; Cheng et al., 1979; Cheng and Costerton, 1980; Mcallister et al., 1994; Huws et al., 2013, 2014, 2016; Zhao et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Anaerobic fungi are among the most potent fiber-degrading organisms in the known biological world, primarily due to their efficient and extensive set of enzymes for the degradation of plant structural polymers.
“anaerobic fungi are among the most potent fiber-degrading organisms in the known biological world, primarily due to their efficient and extensive set of enzymes for the degradation of plant structural polymers (Solomon et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Solomon et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A linear relationship exists between the proportion of fresh grass within the diet and milk fat composition and butter properties in dairy cattle.
“a linear relationship has been noted between the proportion of fresh grass within the diet, and milk fat composition and butter properties in dairy cattle (Couvreur et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Couvreur et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A global comparison study of the rumen microbiome in 742 samples across 32 species identified that 30 of the most abundant bacterial groups were present in over 90% of the samples.
“A recent global comparison study of the rumen microbiome in 742 samples across 32 species from various geographical locations (Henderson et al., 2015), identified that 30 of the most abundant bacterial groups were present in over 90% of the samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Henderson et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Membrane vesicles can contain high concentrations of glycosyl hydrolases, allowing F. succinogenes to effectively degrade plant cellulose.
“These membrane vesicles can contain high concentrations of glycosyl hydrolases, allowing F. succinogenes to effectively degrade plant cellulose (Arntzen et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Arntzen et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Dairy cows with diet-induced SARA had a higher abundance of rumen fungi and lower abundances of rumen protozoa compared with healthy cows.
“Ishaq et al. (2017) also showed that dairy cows with diet-induced SARA had a higher abundance of rumen fungi and lower abundances of rumen protozoa compared with healthy cows.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ishaq et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Saponins can decrease methane production by selectively targeting certain groups of rumen protozoa, methanogens, fungi and bacteria.
“saponins can decrease methane production by selectively targeting certain groups of rumen protozoa, methanogens, fungi and bacteria (Patra and Saxena, 2009b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Patra and Saxena, 2009b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Direct contact with the mother offers a constant source of microbes through the mouth, feces, skin and milk.
“Direct contact with the mother offers a constant source of microbes through the mouth, feces, skin and milk (Yeoman et al., 2018), sources that are not available for calves raised in isolation on milk replacer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yeoman et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The presence of the dam and the associated increase in the availability of microorganisms in the environment promotes differences in rumen colonization.
“Another factor that promotes differences in rumen colonization is the presence of the dam and the associated increase in the availability of microorganisms in the environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abecia et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Exposure of neonate lambs to the dam for 1 week followed by subsequent separation is enough to ensure the establishment of a stable rumen protozoal population for their lifetime.
“A relatively recent study by Ishaq et al. (2015) showed that exposure of neonate lambs to the dam for 1 week followed by subsequent separation was enough to ensure the establishment of a stable rumen protozoal population for their lifetime.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ishaq et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The instability occurring during early life potentially allows for manipulation to assemble a specific community composition that persist later in life for better health and productivity within a given production system.
“The instability occurring during this period potentially allows for manipulation to assemble a specific community composition that persist later in life for better health and productivity within a given production system (Yáñez-Ruiz et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yáñez-Ruiz et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Initial colonization of the rumen occurs 0-2 days post-partum and originates from a combination of sources such as microbiota of mother's vagina, skin, colostrum and microbes within the environment.
“(i) initial colonization (0–2 days post-partum) originated from a combination of sources such as microbiota of mother's vagina, skin, colostrum and microbes within the environment (Van Nimwegen et al., 2011; Yeoman et al., 2018);”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
At birth, ruminants display a non-developed reticulo-rumen.
“At birth, ruminants display a non-developed reticulo-rumen.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Church, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Until the reticulo-rumen is fully matured, ruminants function as monogastrics, whereby milk fed is not digested in the rumen but flows to the abomasum via an esophageal groove.
“Until the system is fully matured, they function as monogastrics, whereby the milk fed is not digested in the rumen but flows to the abomasum via an esophageal groove (Church, 1988).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Church, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The use of probiotics, such as lactic acid bacteria, in early life to mitigate incidence of digestive and respiratory diseases has shown promise.
“Indeed, the use of probiotics, such as lactic acid bacteria, in early life to mitigate incidence of digestive and respiratory diseases has shown promise (Timmerman et al., 2005; Signorini et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Feeding forage vs. concentrate around weaning modifies the bacterial population colonizing the rumen of lambs, and the effect persists over 4 months.
“Yáñez-Ruiz et al. (2010) also reported that feeding forage vs. concentrate around weaning modifies the bacterial population colonizing the rumen of lambs and that the effect persists over 4 months.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yáñez-Ruiz et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Inhibition of methyl-coenzyme M reductase can result in a reduction in rumen methanogenesis (up to 30%) without negative effects to the animal.
“This enzyme catalyzes the last step of methane-forming reactions (Duin et al., 2016) and its inhibition can result in a reduction in rumen methanogenesis (up to 30%) without negative effects to the animal (Hristov et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The antiprotozoal effect of saponins is transitory as when saponins are deglycosylated to sapogenins by rumen microorganisms, they become inactive.
“the antiprotozoal effect of saponins is transitory as when saponins are deglycosylated to sapogenins by rumen microorganisms, they become inactive (Newbold et al., 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Newbold et al., 1997 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The dynamics of gut microbial community establishment in young ruminants occurs in three successive steps.
“The dynamics of the gut microbial community establishment in young ruminants occurs in three successive steps (Rey et al., 2014; Abecia et al., 2017):”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisenone given
Little is known regarding the impact of management practices, such as milk intake and delayed weaning, on early-life programming of the rumen microbiome and its implications for ruminant productivity.
“Nonetheless, little is known regarding the impact of management practices, such as milk intake, delayed weaning etc. on early-life programming of the rumen microbiome and its implications for ruminant productivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Interventions in the early life of the ruminant may offer a better longer-term strategy to improve animal phenotype.
“interventions in the early life of the ruminant may offer a better longer-term strategy to improve animal phenotype.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The transitional stage of rumen microbial establishment occurs 3-15 days during the transition from colostrum to milk.
“(ii) transitional stage (3–15 days) during the transition from colostrum to milk,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Presence of the dam can allow earlier and different inoculation of microbes in the digestive tract of naturally raised newborns as compared to those fed milk replacer and kept in isolation.
“This can allow earlier (and different) inoculation of microbes in the digestive tract of naturally raised newborns as compared to those fed milk replacer and kept in isolation (Abecia et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abecia et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Colonization of the developing rumen begins immediately after birth and progresses through the first few months of life until a stable community establishes.
“Colonization of the developing rumen begins immediately after birth and progresses through the first few months of life until a stable community establishes (Jami et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jami et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The effect of supplementing S. cerevisiae on rumen development and growth performance in neonatal dairy calves has been evaluated.
“The effect of supplementing S. cerevisiae on rumen development and growth performance in neonatal dairy calves has also been evaluated (Lesmeister et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lesmeister et al., 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
SIgA controls the host's recognition of certain microbial species.
“and control the host's recognition of certain microbial species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fouhse et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Genetic influence of the host on rumen passage rate is likely to be one host factor that influences the rumen microbiome.
“Therefore, genetic influence of the host on rumen passage rate is likely to be one host factor that influences the rumen microbiome, but other factors should also be considered (Pinares-Patiño et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pinares-Patiño et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There is increased evidence that host genetics has an influential role on the microbial population residing in the rumen.
“Whilst there is increased evidence that host genetics has an influential role on the microbial population residing in the rumen (Tapio et al., 2017),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tapio et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Under comparable feeding conditions, water buffalo and Jersey cows differ in bacterial, protozoa and methanogen populations.
“Similarly, when the microbiome of water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and Jersey cows were compared under comparable feeding conditions variations in bacterial, protozoa and methanogen populations were found between the two species (Iqbal et al., 2018), suggesting that the rumen microbiome is controlled, to a certain extent, by the genetics of the host.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Iqbal et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Methane production is regulated by host genetics in sheep.
“Pinares-Patiño et al. (2011) and Pinares-Patiño et al. (2013) demonstrated that methane production is also regulated by host genetics in sheep and that selection of low methane emitting animals by genotyping is possible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pinares-Patiño et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pinares-Patiño et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
SIgA has been shown to coat rumen bacteria.
“has been shown to coat rumen bacteria (Fouhse et al., 2017)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fouhse et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Variation in the rumination behavior of animals can influence particle retention time.
“Additionally, variation in the rumination behavior of animals can influence particle retention time (Mcsweeney et al., 1989).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mcsweeney et al., 1989 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
As a consequence of the harsh environmental conditions prevailing in the abomasum and at the beginning of the small intestine, microbial numbers and diversity plummet by several orders of magnitude in the abomasum, duodenum and jejunum as compared to the rumen.
“As a consequence of the harsh environmental conditions prevailing in the abomasum and at the beginning of the small intestine, microbial numbers and diversity plummet by several orders of magnitude in the abomasum, duodenum and jejunum as compared to the rumen (Frey et al., 2010; He et al., 2018; Yeoman et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Rumen physiology is a potential factor that influences the rumen microbiome.
“The physiology of the rumen has also been highlighted as a potential factor that influences the rumen microbiome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Henderson et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract microbiomes play an important role, particularly in early life.
“However, the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract microbiomes also play an important role, particularly in early life (Meale et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Meale et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Our current understanding of the extent of host genetic influence on the rumen microbiome and the underlying mechanisms remains incomplete.
“our current understanding of the extent of this influence and the underlying mechanisms (Sasson et al., 2017) remains incomplete,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sasson et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) favors commensal bacteria in the gut.
“secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA), which favors commensal bacteria in the gut (Gutzeit et al., 2014),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gutzeit et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A region on chromosome 6 was recently associated with Actinobacteria, Euryarchaeota, and Fibrobacteres densities.
“although a region on chromosome 6 was recently associated with Actinobacteria, Euryarchaeota, and Fibrobacteres densities (Golder et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Golder et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Archaeal abundance in ruminal digesta is in part under host genetic control.
“suggesting that archaeal abundance in ruminal digesta is also, in part under host genetic control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The host immune system likely plays an influential role on the rumen microbiome.
“The host immune system also likely plays an influential role on the rumen microbiome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In a beef cattle experiment, group ranking of beef sire progeny groups based on relative archaeal abundance remained consistent overall and within diet.
“In a beef cattle experiment, Roehe et al. (2016) ranked beef sire progeny groups based on relative archaeal abundance and reported that group ranking remained consistent overall and within diet, suggesting that archaeal abundance in ruminal digesta is also, in part under host genetic control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Roehe et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Most microbes flowing from the rumen into the abomasum are lysed by the low pH and enzymatic activity within the organ.
“Most microbes flowing from the rumen into the abomasum are lysed by the low pH and enzymatic activity within the organ.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
22 bacterial OTUs exhibited a heritability estimate of 0.7 or greater in dairy cattle.
“Using sire progeny groups in dairy cattle, further evidence of genetic control was documented by the discovery that 22 bacterial OTUs, exhibited a heritability estimate of 0.7 or greater in dairy cattle (Sasson et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sasson et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Selection of low methane emitting animals by genotyping is possible.
“Pinares-Patiño et al. (2011) and Pinares-Patiño et al. (2013) demonstrated that methane production is also regulated by host genetics in sheep and that selection of low methane emitting animals by genotyping is possible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pinares-Patiño et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pinares-Patiño et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The rumen microbiome is controlled, to a certain extent, by the genetics of the host.
“suggesting that the rumen microbiome is controlled, to a certain extent, by the genetics of the host.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
These heritable OTUs were correlated with traits such as DMI (dry matter intake) and RFI.
“In addition, these heritable OTUs were found to be correlated with traits such as DMI (dry matter intake) and RFI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sasson et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Differences in the relative abundance of certain bacterial populations exist across ruminant species.
“they also identified some differences in the relative abundance of certain bacterial populations across ruminant species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Henderson et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Recent work using metagenomics and/or metatranscriptomics has confirmed significant relationships between the abundances of key rumen microbial genes and feed efficiency and/or methane production.
“Recent work using metagenomics and/or metatranscriptomics has confirmed significant relationships between the abundances of key rumen microbial genes and feed efficiency (Roehe et al., 2016; Shabat et al., 2016; Li and Guan, 2017) and/or methane production (Roehe et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisereasoning
Metataxonomic data is highly variable due largely to the differences in techniques employed across published datasets and animal variation.
“Irrespective, metataxonomic data is highly variable due largely to the differences in techniques employed across published datasets (see Metataxonomy section) and animal variation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Urinary metabolites derived from microbial purines (allantoin and uric acid) have been used to estimate microbial protein synthesis.
“More recent attempts to develop non-invasive biomarker approaches to estimate microbial protein synthesis have used urinary metabolites derived from microbial purines (allantoin and uric acid; Chen et al., 1990).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 1990 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Density of Sharpea has been shown to be significantly lower in low methane emitting animals.
“When investigating the rumen bacterial associations with methane production, density of Sharpea has been shown to be significantly lower in low methane emitting animals (Kamke et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kamke et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Microbial correlations to feed efficiency and/or methane production in ruminants, using rRNA genes or the mcrA gene in methanogens, are difficult to interpret due to confounding factors such as animal type, feed, and rumen sample processing and analysis.
“In terms of metataxonomics, microbial correlations to feed efficiency and/or methane production in ruminants, using rRNA genes or the Methyl coenzyme M reductase (mcrA) gene in methanogens are difficult to interpret, due to the confounding factors such as animal type, feed, and rumen sample processing and analysis (see Metataxonomy section).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Positive correlations between Eubacterium sp. and reduced feed efficiency were reported.
“Positive correlations between Eubacterium sp. and reduced feed efficiency were also reported by Hernandez-Sanabria et al. (2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hernandez-Sanabria et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Feces and samples from the intestines cannot be used as proxies of rumen function on a microbiome biomarker level.
“Notwithstanding, it is highlighted that feces and samples from the intestines cannot be used as proxies of rumen function on a microbiome biomarker level (Tapio et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tapio et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The rumen microbiome of feed efficient ruminants is less diverse than their inefficient counterparts.
“Recent data also suggest that the rumen microbiome of feed efficient ruminants is less diverse than their inefficient counterparts (Shabat et al., 2016; Li and Guan, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shabat et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Li and Guan, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The use of gene biomarkers using metagenomics and/or metatranscriptomic approaches may be more useful than metataxonomic data.
“As such the use of gene biomarkers using metagenomics and/or metranscriptomic approaches may be more useful”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Potential pathogens such as Escherichia, Shigella, Salmonella and Treponema spp. are most frequently found in the mucosa-associated bacterial microbiota.
“Potential pathogens such as Escherichia, Shigella, Salmonella and Treponema spp. are most frequently found in the mucosa-associated bacterial microbiota (Mao et al., 2015; Song et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Differences in both the mucosa-associated microbiota of the rectoanal junction and fecal microbiota of cattle influence the shedding of the human pathogen Escherichia coli O157 in cattle feces.
“Recently, differences in both the mucosa-associated microbiota of the rectoanal junction and fecal microbiota of cattle have been shown to influence the shedding of the human pathogen Escherichia coli O157 in cattle feces (Stenkamp-Strahm et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
A positive correlation between RFI and the uncultured rumen bacterium RF39 was reported.
“Jami et al. (2014) also reported a positive correlation between RFI and the uncultured rumen bacterium RF39,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jami et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Rumen microbes possess genes coding for a high level of functional redundancy.
“given that rumen microbes possess genes coding for a high level of functional redundancy (Edwards et al., 2008; Weimer, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Concentrations of the compound archaeol in feces correlate with methane emissions in cattle.
“Nonetheless, concentrations of the compound archaeol in feces has been shown to correlate with methane emissions in cattle (Mccartney et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mccartney et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The mucosa-associated microbial community is an important modulator of immunological function and health.
“The mucosa-associated microbial community is also an important modulator of immunological function and health (Malmuthuge et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Malmuthuge et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The role of the intestinal microbiota in feed degradation appears to be less important than that of the rumen.
“The role of the intestinal microbiota in feed degradation appears to be less important than that of the rumen (Al-Masaudi et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Al-Masaudi et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Construction of rumen microbiome databases such as RIM-DB, the ureC database, and AF-RefSeq drastically improves ability to monitor rumen microbial diversity.
“Also the construction of rumen microbiome databases to aid accurate taxonomical assignment, such as RIM-DB (for methanogens; Seedorf et al., 2014), the ureC database (ureolytic bacteria; Jin et al., 2017), and AF-RefSeq (anaerobic fungi; Paul et al., 2018) drastically improve our ability to monitor rumen microbial diversity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Edwards et al. (2007) developed a V6-V8 primer pair that reduces amplification of chloroplastic DNA.
“Edwards et al. (2007) also developed a primer pair based on the V6-V8 region which reduce the amplification of chloroplastic DNA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Edwards et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The development of rumen models has been deployed mainly via consolidation of four model structures (Molly, Karoline, Cornell, and Dijkstra) that have been improved over the years to enhance understanding of rumen function.
“The development of rumen models has been deployed mainly via the consolidation of four model structures (Molly, Karoline, Cornell, and Dijkstra models) that have been improved over the years to enhance the understanding of rumen function (Mills et al., 2014; Huhtanen et al., 2015; Van Amburgh et al., 2015; Gregorini et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Amplification of plant chloroplast sequences is a substantial issue for samples from animals fed fresh forage, often masking microbial sequences.
“The amplification of plant chloroplast sequences is a substantial issue for samples taken from animals fed fresh forage (these are often assigned taxonomically as cyanobacteria), with an abundance of intact chloroplast DNA being present in the rumen, and often masks microbial sequences (Edwards et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Edwards et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
PICRUSt has limitations in accurately representing microbiome function.
“Although this approach saves on the cost associated with more thorough and accurate shotgun metagenomic analysis, it has limitations in accurately represent microbiome function (Wilkinson et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilkinson et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
PICRUSt predictions show poor correlation with actual function seen in metagenomics/metatranscriptomic datasets for the rumen microbiome.
“The data shows poor correlation of predicted function with the actual function seen within the metagenomics/metatranscriptomic datasets (Wilkinson et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilkinson et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Our ability to culture rumen bacteria has improved in recent years through development of culture media.
“Our ability to culture rumen bacteria has improved in recent years through the development of culture media (Kenters et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kenters et al., 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Using a basic set of standardized protocols may not be possible due to differing hypotheses and the complex nature of the ecosystem.
“Nonetheless, using a basic set of standardized protocols may not be possible, due to the differing hypotheses and the complex nature of the ecosystem (i.e., host animal), however ensuring data accuracy by using internal standards represents one approach to ensure that comparisons among datasets are valid.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Dilution to extinction has improved ability to culture bacteria in many ecosystems, including the rumen.
“Techniques such as dilution to extinction have also improved our ability to culture bacteria in many ecosystems, including the rumen (Kenters et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kenters et al., 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CowPI is an improved 16S rDNA inference platform for the rumen based on PICRUSt but using Hungate1000 genomes as searchable genomes.
“Wilkinson et al. (2018), developed CowPI an improved 16S rDNA inference platform for the rumen which is based on PICRUSt but uses the Hungate1000 genomes as the searchable genomes (http://www.cowpi.org/).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilkinson et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
This integration task is far from trivial due to multiple time scales and parameter identifiability.
“This integration task is far from trivial due to multiple time scales, among other aspects such as parameter identifiability (Muñoz-Tamayo et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Muñoz-Tamayo et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Differences among studies in DNA extraction, primers, cycling parameters, and downstream computational analysis result in conflicting data.
“Differences among studies exist with respect to DNA extraction, primers and cycling parameters, as well as downstream computational analysis, resulting in conflicting data (Yu and Morrisson, 2004a,b; Edwards et al., 2007; Huws et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2011; Ishaq and Wright, 2014; Vaidya et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
Large-scale, integrative models of the rumen microbiome have yet to be developed.
“We are only in the early stages of applying these approaches to the rumen microbiome, and while network scaffolds for specific animal studies have been generated (Roehe et al., 2016), large-scale, integrative models have yet to be developed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Roehe et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Snelling and Wallace (2017) reported that repeated wash steps and microfiltration were not effective in removing contaminants that prevent accurate protein quantitation and obscure spot patterns in gels.
“Snelling and Wallace (2017) reported that repeated wash steps and microfiltration were not effective in removing the contaminants, which prevent accurate protein quantitation and obscure spot patterns in gels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Snelling and Wallace, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Metagenomic sequences have resulted in an enhanced understanding of niche specialization within rumen bacteria.
“More recently, metagenomic sequences have also resulted in an enhanced understanding of niche specialization within rumen bacteria (Rubino et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rubino et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Using next-generation mass spectrometry, Deusch and Seifert (2015) described over 2,000 proteins associated with the rumen microbial community.
“Using this technique Deusch and Seifert (2015) described over 2,000 proteins associated with the rumen microbial community.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Deusch and Seifert, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
These archaeal proteins were identified as key enzymes involved in the synthesis of methane.
“These archaeal proteins, were identified as key enzymes involved in the synthesis of methane.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Snelling and Wallace, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Network-based approaches are likely to provide the best hope of integrating all this information by allowing a complete overview of the rumen microbiome because they can capture fundamental properties including taxonomy, functional similarity, metabolic processes, co-expression, and gene-sharing.
“Network-based approaches are likely to provide the best hope of integrating all this information by allowing a complete overview of the rumen microbiome as they are capable of capturing the fundamental properties of the microbial ecosystem including taxonomy (Barberan et al., 2012), functional similarity (Martiny et al., 2015), metabolic processes (Shlomi et al., 2008), co-expression (Zhang and”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
When 2D PAGE metaproteomics was applied to rumen digesta samples, it revealed a major shortcoming because the rumen contains high levels of plant secondary compounds such as tannins and other phenolics that complex with proteins and interfere with protein extraction and purification.
“However, when applied to rumen digesta samples this approach revealed a major shortcoming (Snelling and Wallace, 2017), as the rumen contains high levels of plant secondary compounds, such as tannins and other phenolics that complex with the proteins, and interfere with protein extraction and purification (Snelling and Wallace, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Snelling and Wallace, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In dairy cows fed diets varying in roughage to concentrate ratio (80:20, 60:40, 40:60, and 20:80), ruminal amino acids, lipids, organic acids, and carbohydrates were affected.
“In another study using dairy cows fed diets varying in roughage to concentrate ratio (80:20, 60:40, 40:60, and 20:80) ruminal amino acids, lipids, organic acids, and carbohydrates were affected (Zhang J. et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang J. et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Many metabolic databases are targeted toward human pathogens or model aerobic organisms such as Escherichia coli and do not necessarily reflect functions important to the facultative anaerobic lifestyle of rumen microbes.
“However, many of these databases are targeted toward human pathogens or model aerobic organisms, such as Escherichia coli, and do not necessarily reflect the functions important to the facultative anaerobic lifestyle of rumen microbes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The metaproteomic methodology allowed identification of members of protein families associated with the transcriptome of the rumen microbiome.
“Although in its infancy, the meta-proteomic methodology did allow for the identification of members of the protein families that were associated with the transcriptome of the rumen microbiome (Hart and Kingston-Smith, Personal Communication).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hart and Kingston-Smith, Personal Communication
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
There are few studies to date combining both sequencing and metabolomics to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the rumen system.
“However, there are few studies to date combining both sequencing and metabolomics to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the rumen system that would contribute information regarding metabolic expression of the genetic potential of the microbiota (Mao et al., 2016; Zhang J. et al., 2017; O'callaghan et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
There is alteration to organic acids, amino acids, amines, sugars and nucleosides/nucleotides when cows were fed diets low on concentrate (40% DM) compared to high concentrate (70% DM).
“For example, there is alteration to organic acids, amino acids, amines, sugars and nucleosides/nucleotides when cows were fed diets low on concentrate (40%, DM basis) compared to high concentrate (70%, DM basis; Zhang R. et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang R. et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Archaeal proteins were found in surprisingly high abundance in the rumen metaproteome considering the relatively small proportion of the microbial community that archaea occupy.
“Archaeal proteins were also found in surprisingly high abundance considering the relatively small proportion of the microbial community that this group occupies in the rumen.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Snelling and Wallace, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Very few studies have attempted to characterize the rumen microbial community using metaproteomics.
“As a consequence of these technical challenges, very few studies have attempted to characterize the rumen microbial community using metaproteomics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The correlation between mRNA and protein levels can be weak and variable, possibly due to post-transcriptional modifications.
“Despite these developments, it has also been shown that the correlation between mRNA and protein levels can be weak and variable, possibly due to post-transcriptional modifications (Greenbaum et al., 2003; Csárdi et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Kingston-Smith et al. (2013), using FT-IR spectroscopy-based metabolite profiling, showed that it was possible to discriminate differences in the rumen plant-microbe interactome when three different cultivars of perennial ryegrass were used as substrate.
“Kingston-Smith et al. (2013), using Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FT-IR) spectroscopy-based metabolite profiling, also showed that it was possible to discriminate differences in the rumen plant-microbe interactome when three different cultivars of perennial ryegrass were used as substrate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kingston-Smith et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Isoform diversity maintains selective advantage and niche specialization within Prevotella and Clostridium genera.
“Their data suggests that isoform diversity maintains selective advantage and niche specialization within these genera.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rubino et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 47
- May combine two claims. 64
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGlobal meat and milk production will have to increase by 76 and 63%, respectively.
“estimates suggest that global meat and milk production will have to increase by 76 and 63%, respectively (Alexandratos and Bruinsma, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alexandratos and Bruinsma, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationL. leucocephala contains the toxin mimosine which is converted in the rumen to DHP, an effective goitrogen.
“L. leucocephala contains the toxin mimosine which is converted in the rumen to 4-hydroxy-4(H)-pyridone (DHP), an effective goitrogen (Wallace, 2008)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wallace, 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese microbes interact with each other and have a symbiotic relationship with the host, providing energy from the breakdown of plant cell wall carbohydrates that are largely inedible by humans.
“These microbes interact with each other and have a symbiotic relationship with the host, providing energy from the breakdown of plant cell wall carbohydrates that are largely inedible by humans (Mizrahi, 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mizrahi, 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRuminants commonly harbor distinct protozoal populations from birth, with only minor changes in diversity throughout life, although the abundances of species fluctuate with changes in diet.
“Ruminants commonly harbor distinct protozoal populations from birth, with only minor changes in diversity throughout life, although the abundances of species fluctuate with changes in diet (Williams and Coleman, 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Williams and Coleman, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMethane is produced primarily via the hydrogenotrophic pathway as a result of the reduction of CO2, and less so through methylotrophic or acetoclastic pathways.
“Methane is produced primarily via the hydrogenotrophic pathway (Figure 1) as a result of the reduction of CO2, and less so through the utilization of methyl groups (methylotrophic pathway), or even less commonly from acetate (acetoclastic pathway; Morgavi et al., 2010; Tapio et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAround 2-8% of the dietary energy can be lost to methane production, with values as high as 12% reported for low quality feeds.
“around 2–8% of the dietary energy can be lost to methane (CH4) production (IPCC, 2006); values as high as 12% have been reported for low quality feeds (Johnson and Johnson, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites IPCC, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Johnson and Johnson, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRuminant livestock production is responsible for approximately 14% of anthropogenic methane released annually into the atmosphere due to the activity of rumen methanogens.
“Ruminant livestock production has been estimated to be responsible for approximately 14% of anthropogenic methane, a potent greenhouse gas (GHG), released annually into the atmosphere due to the activity of rumen methanogens (Gerber et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gerber et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationN2O has a 298-fold greater global warming potential than CO2.
“N2O, a GHG with a 298-fold greater global warming potential than CO2 (Hristov et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hristov et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe world population is predicted to reach approximately 9.7 billion by 2050.
“Whilst some models predict the world population to peak at 9.7 billion in 2050, others estimate a population of 11.2 billion in 2100 (United Nations, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites United Nations, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMethanomassiliicoccaceae can represent approximately 50-70% of the rumen archaea.
“some published data show that Methanomassiliicoccaceae can represent approximately 50–70% of the rumen archaea (Huang et al., 2016; Wang P. et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Huang et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang P. et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRuminants provide human-edible nutritious foods derived from marginal land, without competing with food crop production.
“As a consequence of their highly evolved rumen microbiome, ruminants provide human-edible nutritious foods derived from marginal land, without competing with food crop production (Kingston-Smith et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kingston-Smith et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTannins protect dietary protein from degradation in the rumen without significantly affecting the efficiency of carbohydrate digestion.
“it is well established that tannins protect dietary protein from degradation in the rumen without significantly affecting the efficiency of carbohydrate digestion (Mcsweeney et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mcsweeney et al., 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAnaerobic fungi represent 10-20% of the rumen microbiome.
“Chitin measurements (Rezaeian et al., 2004) and rRNA transcript abundance (Elekwachi et al., 2017) indicate that anaerobic fungi represent 10–20% of the rumen microbiome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMembers of the methanogen clades Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii and Methanobrevibacter ruminantium were found in nearly all samples and accounted for 74% of the archaea.
“Members of the methanogen clades Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii and Methanobrevibacter ruminantium were found in nearly all samples and accounted for 74% of the archaea.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Henderson et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationS. cerevisiae can increase the density of fibrolytic bacteria and hence feed efficiency due to its oxygen scavenging activity in the rumen.
“Due to its oxygen scavenging activity in the rumen (Newbold et al., 1996), S. cerevisiae can increase the density of fibrolytic bacteria and hence feed efficiency (Desnoyers et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnimals fed high-grain diets tend to have lower bacterial diversity and lower concentrations of fibrolytic microbes (protozoa and anaerobic fungi), which are generally associated with lower rumen proteolysis and ultimately higher feed efficiency.
“animals fed high-grain diets tend to have lower bacterial diversity and lower concentrations of fibrolytic microbes (i.e., protozoa and anaerobic fungi), which are generally associated with lower rumen proteolysis and ultimately higher feed efficiency (Belanche et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Belanche et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSodium bicarbonate and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation both have shown some success in preventing sub-acute acidosis (SARA).
“Sodium bicarbonate and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation both have shown some success in preventing sub-acute acidosis (SARA; Keunen et al., 2003; González et al., 2012; Ishaq et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnaerobic fungi have been shown to improve feed intake, feed digestibility, feed efficiency, daily weight gain and milk production.
“Anaerobic fungi are clearly beneficial, and have been shown to improve feed intake, feed digestibility, feed efficiency, daily weight gain and milk production (Lee et al., 2000; Dey et al., 2004; Paul et al., 2004; Tripathi et al., 2007; Saxena et al., 2010; Puniya et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEssential oils slow down starch and protein degradation, decreasing the risk of acidosis while causing minor reductions in rumen methanogenesis.
“Essential oils have been proven to slow down starch and protein degradation, decreasing the risk of acidosis while causing minor reductions in rumen methanogenesis (Calsamiglia et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Calsamiglia et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationApplication of bromochloromethane (BCM) to young goat kids modified archaeal colonization of the rumen, and was linked to a reduction in methane emission of around 50%, with the effects persisting for 3 months after weaning.
“It has been shown that application of bromochloromethane (BCM) to young goat kids modified archaeal colonization of the rumen, and was linked to a reduction in methane emission of around 50%, with the effects persisting for 3 months after weaning (Abecia et al., 2013, 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn another near-total rumen content exchange between high- and low-efficiency Holstein cows, the hosts returned the rumen bacterial community to the original status, linking the rumen microbiome to milk production efficiency.
“Furthermore, in another near-total rumen content exchange between high- and low-efficiency Holstein cows, Weimer et al. (2017) demonstrated the hosts ability to return the rumen bacterial community to the original status, whilst linking the rumen microbiome to milk production efficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weimer et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDiet is the main driver for rumen microbiome composition.
“Whilst Henderson et al. (2015) postulated that diet was the main driver for rumen microbiome composition, they also identified some differences in the relative abundance of certain bacterial populations across ruminant species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Henderson et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFeeding live microorganisms to ruminants is not a novel concept and extensive work has been published on the use of direct-fed microbials (DFM).
“Feeding live microorganisms to ruminants is not a novel concept and extensive work has been published on the use of “direct-fed microbials” (DFM; Martin and Nisbet, 1992; Jeyanathan et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Martin and Nisbet, 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jeyanathan et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFeeding concentrate in early life stimulates the development of the epithelium, while feeding high fiber diets can stimulate development of rumen muscularization and volume.
“It is also known that feeding concentrate in early life stimulates the development of the epithelium, while feeding high fiber diets can stimulate development of rumen muscularization and volume (Zitnan et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zitnan et al., 1998 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough the rumen microbiome establishes before intake of solid feeds, the type of feed consumed plays a significant role in shaping the established rumen microbiome.
“It is important to note that although the rumen microbiome establishes before intake of solid feeds, the type of feed consumed plays a significant role in shaping the established rumen microbiome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yáñez-Ruiz et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenDespite some promising results from early-life dietary interventions, the ecological dynamics underpinning the microbial colonization, the most effective window of time for intervention and the long-term implications have yet to be identified.
“Despite some promising results from early-life dietary interventions, the ecological dynamics underpinning the microbial colonization, the most effective window of time for intervention and the long-term implications have yet to be identified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningNaturally reared calves have a greater number of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) and bacterial diversity than artificially reared calves.
“This explains the greater number of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) and bacterial diversity observed in naturally reared calves.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abecia et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationArtificially reared calves have a near absence of protozoa in the rumen, as protozoa can only be inoculated in the rumen by direct contact with the dam or other mature animals through saliva.
“Another distinctive feature between natural and artificial rearing systems is the near absence of protozoa in the rumen of artificially reared calves, as protozoa can only be inoculated in the rumen by direct contact with the dam or other mature animals through saliva (Abecia et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abecia et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSupplementation of phloroglucinol together with 3-NOP promotes capture of excess hydrogen from methanogenesis and generates valuable metabolites for the host.
“Supplementation of phloroglucinol together with 3-NOP promotes capture of excess hydrogen from methanogenesis and generates valuable metabolites for the host (Martinez-Fernandez et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Martinez-Fernandez et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAfter near total exchange of the rumen contents between cows, individuals restored their bacterial composition back to pre-exchange conditions, which also returned rumen pH and volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration to pre-exchange values.
“Evidence of the influence of the host on the rumen microbiome was first postulated by Weimer et al. (2010) who found that after near total exchange of the rumen contents between cows, individuals restored their bacterial composition back to pre-exchange conditions, which also returned rumen pH and volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration to pre-exchange values.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weimer et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe maturation stage of rumen microbial establishment is characterized by progressively increasing solid feed intake and a distribution of main bacterial phyla and other microbial groups comparable to that in adult animals.
“iii) maturation stage in which solid feed intake progressively increases and the distribution of main bacterial phyla and other microbial groups is comparable to that in adult animals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe post-ruminal microbial community is composed predominantly of bacteria, but methanogenic archaea and anaerobic fungi have been described.
“The post-ruminal microbial community is composed predominantly of bacteria, but methanogenic archaea and anaerobic fungi have been described (Davies et al., 1993), although the later phylogentic group has not been targeted intensively with high-throughput sequencing techniques.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davies et al., 1993 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevotella, Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Faecalibacterium, Roseburia and Clostridium are consistently identified in fecal samples from ruminants and are considered part of the core microbiota.
“Prevotella, Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Faecalibacterium, Roseburia and Clostridium are consistently identified in fecal samples from ruminants and are considered part of the core microbiota (Dowd et al., 2008; Durso et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDifferences in rumen and camelid foregut volume, physiology as well as feeding frequencies were suggested as a reason for the proportionally higher abundance of unclassified Veillonellaceae in camelids, deer and sheep compared to cattle.
“For example, differences in rumen and camelid foregut volume, physiology as well as feeding frequencies, was suggested as a reason for the proportionally higher abundance of unclassified Veillonellaceae in camelids, deer and sheep compared to cattle (Henderson et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Henderson et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMethane yield is associated with retention time in the rumen; increased passage rate in the rumen correlates with reduced methane yield.
“In addition, methane yield is associated with retention time in the rumen (Pinares-Patiño et al., 2003) correlating increased passage rate in the rumen with reduced methane yield.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pinares-Patiño et al., 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth a shorter rumen retention time and a smaller rumen result in reduced methane yield.
“It has also been demonstrated that both a shorter rumen retention time and a smaller rumen result in reduced methane yield (Goopy et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goopy et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrevotella, Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Treponema, and Desulfovibrio genera were detected in all segments of the GI tract of ruminant animals, while Fibrobacter was only present in the foregut.
“Prevotella, Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Treponema, and Desulfovibrio genera were detected in all segments of the GI tract of ruminant animals, while Fibrobacter was only present in the foregut (Zeng et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zeng et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFrom the ileum onwards, including caecum, colon and feces, favorable fermentation conditions are present again and microbial density and phylogenetic diversity increase to a level comparable to that of the rumen.
“From the ileum onwards, including caecum, colon and feces, favorable fermentation conditions are present again and microbial density and phylogenetic diversity increase to a level comparable to that of the rumen (Frey et al., 2010; De Oliveira et al., 2013; Popova et al., 2017; He et al., 2018; Yeoman et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe rectal microbiota shows important inter-individual variation and is affected by diet.
“As for the rumen, the rectal microbiota shows important inter-individual variation (Durso et al., 2010) and are affected by diet (Shanks et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost studies involve a small number of animals, making it difficult to clearly confirm the link between methanogen diversity and methane emissions.
“However, most studies involve a small number of animals, making it difficult to clearly confirm the link between methanogen diversity and methane emissions (Morgavi et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Morgavi et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPurine bases were used as biomarkers for microbial (protein) synthesis in studies with intestinally cannulated animals.
“while purine bases (Zinn and Owens, 1986) were also used as biomarkers for microbial (protein) synthesis in studies with intestinally cannulated animals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zinn and Owens, 1986
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe main function of the intestinal microbiota has been suggested to be related to animal health and cross-talk interaction with the animal host.
“Its main function has been suggested to be related to animal health and cross-talk interaction with the animal host (Lyte et al., 2018), although work in this area is only in its nascent phase and these aspects need further investigation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lyte et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNucleic acids have long been used as biomarkers for rumen microbial processes.
“Nucleic acids have long been used as biomarkers for rumen microbial processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mcallan and Smith, 1969
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zinn and Owens, 1986
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenGenes identified consistently across experiments represent the most promising marker genes.
“Genes identified consistently across experiments and therefore representing the most promising marker genes are highlighted in gray.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe genes listed in Table 3 are potential gene biomarkers indicative of methane production from ruminants.
“Table 3 Potential gene biomarkers indicative of methane production from ruminants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMethanogen diversity, and not density, is critically important to methane output, with more diversity being associated with higher emissions.
“Recent studies suggest that methanogen diversity, and not density, is critically important to methane output, with more diversity being associated with higher emissions (Janssen and Kirs, 2008; Carberry et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Janssen and Kirs, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Carberry et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMucosa-associated communities differ from those associated with luminal contents and vary among intestinal regions.
“Mucosa-associated communities differ from those associated with luminal contents; and also vary among intestinal regions (Malmuthuge et al., 2014; Mao et al., 2015; Yeoman et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEarly work focussed on rumen microbial protein synthesis and RNA.
“Early work focussed on rumen microbial protein synthesis and RNA (Mcallan and Smith, 1969),”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mcallan and Smith, 1969
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFeed efficient animals excrete less urinary ammonia, suggesting better rumen nitrogen use efficiency.
“These data corresponds with observations that feed efficient animals excrete less urinary ammonia suggesting better rumen nitrogen use efficiency (Bach et al., 2005; Broderick and Reynal, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bach et al., 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Broderick and Reynal, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAn increase in the acrylate pathway coded by Megasphaera elsdenii and Coprococcus catus in the rumen may increase feed efficiency and reduce methane.
“whereas Shabat et al. (2016), suggested that an increase in the acrylate pathway coded by Megasphaera elsdenii and Coprococcus catus in the rumen may increase feed efficiency and reduce methane.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shabat et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe ratio of bacteria:archaea reflects methane output from the animal, with positive correlations reported in a few studies, but results are not consistent.
“It has been suggested also that the ratio of bacteria:archaea reflects methane output from the animal with positive correlations reported in a few studies (Wallace et al., 2014; Auffret et al., 2017b), but results are not consistent (Tapio et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationBuccal swabbing may be used as a proxy for rumen samples.
“raising the possibility that buccal swabbing may be used as a proxy for rumen samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe oral microbiome of ruminants reflects the microbial diversity seen in the rumen.
“Recently it was suggested that the oral microbiome of ruminants reflects the microbial diversity seen in the rumen (Tapio et al., 2016), raising the possibility that buccal swabbing may be used as a proxy for rumen samples.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tapio et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningCOBRA approaches provide rational tools for metabolic engineering.
“Overall, COBRA approaches provide rational tools for metabolic engineering.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA great challenge is to deploy different model structures, capitalizing on omics data, and responding to different goals varying from supporting livestock management within a precision farming context to guiding microbial programming strategies.
“A great challenge is to deploy different model structures, capitalizing on “omics” data, and responding to different goals varying from supporting livestock management within a precision farming context to guiding microbial programming strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe construction of a rumen microbiome GEM will need to address central questions that remain to be elucidated due to the early stage of microbial community modeling.
“The construction of a rumen microbiome GEM will need to address central questions that remain to be elucidated due to the early stage of microbial community modeling (Zengler and Palsson, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zengler and Palsson, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Hungate1000 project sequenced 420 representatives of rumen microbes, mainly bacteria, providing a major tool for the community.
“The Hungate1000 project recently finished having sequenced 420 representatives of rumen microbes (mainly bacteria), and thus providing a major tool for the community (Seshadri et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Seshadri et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationSince COBRA approaches mainly operate at steady-state, dynamic frameworks will need to be adapted to account for dynamic fluctuations within the rumen environment.
“Moreover, since COBRA approaches mainly operates at steady-state, dynamic frameworks (Mahadevan et al., 2002; Baroukh et al., 2014) will need to be adapted to account for the dynamic fluctuations within the rumen environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese rumen models represent relevant aspects that determine nutritional and emission responses for a given diet but do not attempt to provide a detailed description of the microbiota or its function.
“These models represent relevant aspects that determine the nutritional and emission responses for a given diet but do not attempt to provide a detailed description of the microbiota or its function (Ellis et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ellis et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFor specific bacterial 16S rRNA, V6-V8 primers were more appropriate than V3 primers.
“However, Huws et al. (2007) concluded that for specific bacterial 16S rRNA V6-V8 primers were more appropriate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Huws et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe most popular COBRA method is flux balance analysis (FBA), which finds network reaction fluxes that optimize a regulatory condition such as microbial growth.
“The most popular COBRA method is flux balance analysis (FBA; Varma et al., 1993; Varma and Palsson, 1994), which looks at finding the network reaction fluxes that optimize a regulatory condition (e.g., microbial growth).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Varma et al., 1993 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Varma and Palsson, 1994
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenRumen GEMs must be further integrated into whole rumen digestion models to provide a system-level picture of dynamic interplay between diet, host, and microbiota.
“Clearly rumen GEMs must be further integrated into whole rumen digestion models to provide a system-level picture of the dynamic interplay between the diet, the animal host and the rumen microbiota.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationReducing agents were not required to culture all rumen bacteria and their removal resulted in higher microbial diversity.
“A recent study by Poelaert et al. (2018) showed that reducing agents were not required to culture all rumen bacteria and that when removed they resulted in higher microbial diversity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Poelaert et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationV3 primers were non-specific to bacteria and could amplify plant chloroplastic DNA as well as archaeal 16S rDNA and protozoal 18S rDNA sequences.
“Huws et al. (2007) and Edwards et al. (2007), however showed that the V3 primers were non-specific to bacteria and could amplify plant chloroplastic DNA as well as archaeal 16S rDNA and protozoal 18S rDNA sequences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe amplicon size from Edwards et al. (2017) primers is often too large for effective sequencing, so the reverse primer was changed to avoid chloroplast identification and produce a smaller amplicon for NGS.
“Nonetheless, the amplicon size obtained using the Edwards et al. (2017) primers are often too large for effective sequencing, therefore the reverse primer has been changed to enable avoidance of chloroplast identification and production of a smaller amplicon for NGS sequencing (Belanche et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Belanche et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOne key question is how microbial species, their metabolic networks, and interspecies interactions should be represented.
“One of these key questions is how microbial species, their metabolic networks, and interspecies interactions should be represented (Biggs et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Biggs et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationOnce this question is elucidated, a plethora of COBRA methods can be deployed to investigate genotype-phenotype relationships.
“Once this question is elucidated, a plethora of constraint-based reconstruction and analysis (COBRA) methods can be deployed to investigate genotype–phenotype relationships (Lewis et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lewis et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEach DNA extraction method has advantages and disadvantages that need to be considered based on sample type, but bead beating is critical.
“They conclude that each method has advantages and disadvantages which need to be considered based on sample type, but bead beating is critical.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vaidya et al., 2018 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenInferring metabolic function from phylogenetic data allows the scientific community to obtain retrospective value from these datasets in order to understand the rumen microbiome in light of global agricultural challenges.
“Regardless, inferring metabolic function from phylogenetic data allows the scientific community to obtain retrospective value from these datasets in order to understand the rumen microbiome in light of global agricultural challenges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningEnsuring data accuracy by using internal standards represents one approach to ensure comparisons among datasets are valid.
“Nonetheless, using a basic set of standardized protocols may not be possible, due to the differing hypotheses and the complex nature of the ecosystem (i.e., host animal), however ensuring data accuracy by using internal standards represents one approach to ensure that comparisons among datasets are valid.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMetataxonomic rDNA data have provided insights into rumen microbiome composition under differing parameters, but these techniques are limited in providing insight into microbial function.
“Irrespective, metataxonomic rDNA data have provided insights into the composition of the rumen microbiome under differing parameters, but these techniques are limited in terms of providing insight into microbial function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningCentral to this task and for development of novel strategies to enhance ruminant production and reduce environmental impact is the need for data sharing and collaboration.
“Central to this task and for the development of novel strategies to enhance ruminant production and reduce environmental impact is the need for data sharing and collaboration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMicrodroplet encapsulation technique has had success for culturing marine bacteria.
“Another method, which has had success for culturing marine bacteria, is the microdroplet encapsulation technique (Zengler et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zengler et al., 2002 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe RBB+C DNA extraction method yielded more DNA than other tested methods, and bead beating was crucial.
“They concluded that the RBC + C method yielded more DNA and that bead beating was crucial.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yu and Morrisson, 2004a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationShotgun metagenomics was first applied to the rumen to discover novel biomass degrading enzymes from switchgrass-associated microbes.
“Shotgun metagenomics was first applied to the rumen in order to discover novel biomass degrading enzymes from switchgrass-associated microbes (Hess et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hess et al., 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenDuring translation, the ribosome protects around 30 nucleotides of the mRNA from nuclease activity.
“Riboseq takes advantage of the fact that during translation, the ribosome protects around 30 nucleotides of the mRNA from nuclease activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMetagenomics has been used to study methane emissions in cattle and sheep, biomarkers to predict ruminal methanogenesis, effects of feed-conversion-ratio, breed and host genetics on rumen microbiome composition, nutrient acquisition, diet effects, and feed additives on antimicrobial-resistance gene abundance.
“Subsequently, metagenomics has been used to study many aspects of rumen microbiology, including methane emissions in cattle (Wallace et al., 2015) and sheep (Shi et al., 2014), biomarkers to predict ruminal methanogenesis (Auffret et al., 2017b), the effect of feed-conversion-ratio, and breed and host genetics on the composition of the rumen microbiome (Roehe et al., 2016), nutrient acquisition (M”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAssembly binning was first achieved by Tyson et al. (2004) from an acidophilic biofilm.
“Assembly binning refers to the construction of complete or near complete microbial genomes directly from metagenomic sequencing data, and was first achieved by Tyson et al. (2004) from an acidophilic biofilm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tyson et al., 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDespite limitations, Snelling and Wallace (2017) identified proteins directly associated with the functional activity of the rumen microbial community from 2D PAGE spots, including abundant structural proteins (actin, alpha and beta tubulin, axonemal dynein light chain) involved in ciliate locomotion, and prokaryotic enzymes from Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes involved in central metabolism.
“Despite these limitations, Snelling and Wallace (2017) did identify proteins directly associated with the functional activity of the rumen microbial community from 2D PAGE spots. Abundant structural proteins were identified including actin, alpha and beta tubulin, and axonemal isoforms dynein light chain, which are all involved in the locomotion of ciliates. Among prokaryotic proteins were enzymes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Snelling and Wallace, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHess et al. (2011) were the first to apply assembly binning to ruminants, assembling 15 draft microbial genomes from the switchgrass associated microbiome of cattle.
“Hess et al. (2011) were the first to apply this to ruminants, assembling 15 draft microbial genomes from the switchgrass associated microbiome of cattle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hess et al., 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWithin metagenome sequences from 14 silage-fed cows, Prevotella possessed higher levels of glycosyl hydrolase isoforms relating to hemicellulose degradation, while Clostridium contained higher levels of GH isoforms for cellulose degradation.
“Rubino et al. (2017) showed that, within metagenome sequences from 14 silage-fed cows, that the genus Prevotella possessed higher levels of glycosyl hydrolase (GH) isoforms relating specifically to the degradation of hemicellulose, whilst Clostridium contained higher levels of GH isoforms for enzymes specifically involved in cellulose degradation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rubino et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMetaproteomics has theoretical advantages over RNA sequencing because protein half-life can be significantly longer than RNA transcripts, so protein identification may provide a more accurate picture of microbial activity at a single time point than mRNA sequencing.
“As a concept, it has some theoretical advantages over RNA sequencing methods in that the half-life of proteins can be significantly longer than RNA transcripts. Therefore, if the data represent a “snapshot” of microbial activity at a single time point, then identification of the proteins arguably will provide a more accurate picture than sequencing mRNA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationUsing a combination of several metabolomics platforms, Saleem et al. (2013) demonstrated that the rumen metabolome is not as simple as previously anticipated, reporting 246 compounds including phospholipids, inorganic ions, gases, amino acids, dicarboxylic acids, fatty acids, volatile fatty acids, glycerides, carbohydrate and cholesterol esters.
“Using a combination of several metabolomics platforms, the pioneer study by Saleem et al. (2013) demonstrated that the rumen metabolome is not as simple as previously anticipated. Indeed, 246 compounds were reported as part of the rumen metabolome, including: phospholipids, inorganic ions, gases, amino acids, dicarboxylic acids, fatty acids, volatile fatty acids, glycerides, carbohydrate and ch”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Saleem et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMetatranscriptomes provide insight into the actual function of microbiomes via gene expression, whereas metagenomics allows evaluation of diversity and potential functional capacity.
“Whilst metagenomics allows us to evaluate diversity and the potential functional capacity of a microbiome, metatranscriptomes provide insight into the actual function of microbiomes via gene expression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHi-C binning has been used effectively on human feces and in ruminants.
“Hi-C binning has been used effectively on human feces (Press et al., 2017) as well as in ruminants (Stewart et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIntegration of different omics data types has provided novel insights missed by either approach alone, such as Shi et al. (2014) demonstrating that differences in methane production were not due to differences in abundances of genes responsible, but rather a result of their differential expression.
“This level of data integration has provided some novel insights missed by either approach alone, such as by Shi et al. (2014) who demonstrated that differences in methane production were not due to differences in the abundances of the genes responsible, but rather a result of their differential expression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shi et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRibosome profiling (riboseq) has been developed as a direct method to quantify and characterize translation.
“Ribosome profiling (riboseq) has been developed as a direct method to quantify and characterize translation (Ingolia et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ingolia et al., 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe success of metagenomic binning procedures is validated by investigating the number of single-copy core-genome genes within each bin, as implemented by CheckM.
“The success of such binning procedures is validated by investigating the number of single-copy core-genome genes within each bin, as implemented by software such as CheckM (Parks et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Parks et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationArtegoitia et al. (2017) reported 33 metabolites differing in cattle having high or low average daily gain.
“Recently, Artegoitia et al. (2017) reported 33 metabolites differing in cattle having high or low average daily gain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Artegoitia et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe majority of rumen metabolome studies have used LC-MS, GC-MS, and NMR, with NMR the most used due to reliability and absolute quantification.
“To date, the majority of rumen metabolome studies have used liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), with the latter the most used due to reliability and absolute quantification (Goldansaz et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goldansaz et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe development of MetaRibo-Seq at a metatranscriptomic level is in its infancy and still requires validation for the rumen microbiome.
“Nonetheless, whilst the use of this technique on pure cultures has been effective, the development of the technique (MetaRibo-Seq) at a metatranscriptomic level is in its infancy and still requires validation for the rumen micobiome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe rumen remains a source of valuable bioactives for the biotechnology industry, and metagenomics is a key tool for such bioprospecting.
“The rumen also remains a source of valuable bioactives for the biotechnology industry, and metagenomics is a key tool for such bioprospecting (Oyama et al., 2017; Roumpeka et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSvartstrom et al. (2017) assembled 99 microbial genomes from the moose rumen, Stewart et al. (2018) assembled 913 microbial genomes from the rumen of cattle, and Parks et al. (2017) assembled over 8,000 novel microbial genomes from 1,500 public datasets, some of which originated from the rumen.
“Subsequently, Svartstrom et al. (2017) assembled 99 microbial genomes from the moose rumen, Stewart et al. (2018) assembled 913 microbial genomes from the rumen of cattle, and Parks et al. (2017) assembled over 8,000 novel microbial genomes from 1,500 public datasets, some of which originated from the rumen.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe terminology of microbiome is often misused within the rumen context because there is a tendency to focus on rumen bacteria alone without consideration of eukaryotes, which limits our ability to understand the rumen microbiome as these groups interact and affect production and environmental impact.
“The terminology of microbiome is often misused within the rumen context as there is a tendency to focus on the study of the rumen bacteria alone, without consideration of the eukaryotes. This undoubtedly limits our ability to understand the rumen microbiome, as these groups of microbes interact with each other, consequently affecting production and the environmental impact of ruminants (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenImproving our ability to measure phenotype using rumen microbiome gene-based biomarkers may allow high-throughput phenotype predictions.
“Improving our ability to measure phenotype using rumen microbiome gene based biomarkers may also allow high throughput phenotype predictions (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMuch emphasis has been given to using plant/additive/supplement strategies to manipulate the rumen microbiome to improve efficiency of animal production, but these have had limited success when applied to the mature animal.
“Irrespective, much emphasis has been given to using plant/additive/supplement strategies to manipulate the rumen microbiome in a manner that improves efficiency of animal production. Although, these have had limited success when applied to the mature animal, recent data show that ruminant breeding programs coupled with a defined dietary management protocols from birth may be the best ways to”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenRecent data show that ruminant breeding programs coupled with defined dietary management protocols from birth may be the best ways to achieve lifelong animal phenotype benefits with limited financial and labor input.
“Although, these have had limited success when applied to the mature animal, recent data show that ruminant breeding programs coupled with a defined dietary management protocols from birth may be the best ways to achieve lifelong animal phenotype benefits with limited financial and labor input.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe ruminant sector has made major strides to improving animal phenotype through understanding the rumen microbiome, and further advances will no doubt be accomplished given exponential advances in omic technologies.
“Irrespective, the ruminant sector has made major strides to improving animal phenotype, through understanding the rumen microbiome, and further advances will no doubt be accomplished, especially given the exponential advances in “omic” technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The rumen is a complex ecosystem composed of anaerobic bacteria, protozoa, fungi, methanogenic archaea and phages.
“The rumen is a complex ecosystem composed of anaerobic bacteria, protozoa, fungi, methanogenic archaea and phages.”
The paper relies on this without support.
These microbes interact closely to breakdown plant material that cannot be digested by humans, whilst providing metabolic energy to the host and, in the case of archaea, producing methane.
“These microbes interact closely to breakdown plant material that cannot be digested by humans, whilst providing metabolic energy to the host and, in the case of archaea, producing methane.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ruminants produce meat and milk, which are rich in high-quality protein, vitamins and minerals, and therefore contribute to food security.
“Consequently, ruminants produce meat and milk, which are rich in high-quality protein, vitamins and minerals, and therefore contribute to food security.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Total agricultural production (including crops and animals) will need to be 60% higher than in 2005.
“the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) predicts that total agricultural production (including crops and animals) will need to be 60% higher than in 2005.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The rumen epithelium plays an important role in both nutrient uptake and immunity.
“In addition, the rumen epithelium plays an important role in both nutrient uptake and immunity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The microbial composition of the post-ruminal gastrointestinal tract is shaped by pH, gut motility, redox potential, and host secretions present in different compartments of the digestive tract.
“The microbial composition of the post-ruminal gastrointestinal tract is shaped by pH, gut motility, redox potential, and host secretions present in different compartments of the digestive tract.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Compared to the rumen, the proportion of Bacteroidetes decreases and that of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria increases in the post-rumen.
“In general terms, compared to the rumen, the proportion of Bacteroidetes decrease and that of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria increase.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The microbial diversity within the rumen offers the animal resilience from dietary related perturbations, such as acidosis.
“The microbial diversity within the rumen offers the animal resilience from dietary related perturbations, such as acidosis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The sheer size of the rumen and its connectedness with the vascular, respiratory and immune systems mean that it is well-placed to both affect, and be affected by, animal function.
“The sheer size of the rumen (12–15% of body mass) and connectedness with the vascular, respiratory and immune systems mean that it is well-placed to both affect, and be affected by, animal function.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a growing number of examples where the interaction between host and intestinal microbial metabolism can be used to explain, or act as a biomarker for, complex traits such as nutrient efficiency, responses to stressors such as disease and adverse environments, as well as to predict animal behavior.
“There is a growing number of examples where the interaction between host and intestinal microbial metabolism can be used to explain, or act as a biomarker for, complex traits such as nutrient efficiency, responses to stressors such as disease and adverse environments, as well as to predict animal behavior.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Recent advances in analytical technologies and bioinformatics have greatly expanded capacity to investigate the role of the rumen and its microbiome in complex traits by studying the composition of microbial DNA and RNA, as well as microbial metabolites in blood or urine.
“Recent advances in analytical technologies and bioinformatics have now greatly expanded our capacity to investigate the role of the rumen and its microbiome in complex traits by studying the composition of microbial DNA and RNA (metataxonomics, metagenomics and metatranscriptomics), as well as microbial metabolites in blood or urine (metabolomics).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Due to the vastness of these datasets it is difficult to compare and investigate whether studies commonly find consensus genes that would serve as good global biomarkers in their correlation studies.
“Due to the vastness of these datasets it is difficult to compare and investigate whether studies commonly find consensus genes that would serve as good global biomarkers in their correlation studies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many rumen bacteria remain uncultured and uncharacterized, and genomic information on rumen eukaryotes is especially sparse in the Hungate1000 genomes due to challenges of sequencing A-T rich genomes.
“However, many of the rumen bacteria remain uncultured and uncharacterized, with genomic information on the rumen eukaroytes being especially sparse in the Hungate1000 genomes as a result of the challenges of sequencing the A-T rich genomes of these microbes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Microbial metabolism is bound by constraints including thermodynamics, substrate and enzyme availability.
“The COBRA methods rely on the principle that microbial metabolism is bound by constraints that include thermodynamics, substrate and enzyme availability.”
The paper relies on this without support.
COBRA methods mainly operate under steady-state.
“These methods mainly operate under steady-state.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Annealing temperatures and number of PCR cycles bias results.
“The annealing temperatures and number of cycles used for PCR are also clearly going to bias results somewhat.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Large culture collections may be limited to or biased toward strains that are easy to culture, highly abundant organisms, and organisms of specific research interest.
“However, they may also be limited to, or biased toward, strains that are easy to culture, highly abundant organisms and organisms which are of specific interest to research.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Highly efficient animals produce less CH4 and produce more milk, consuming less feed owing to their unique set of rumen microbiome.
“Highly efficient animals produce less CH4 and produce more milk, consuming less feed owing to their unique set of rumen microbiome (13).”
From Phytogenic Additives Can Modulate Rumen Microbiome to Mediate Fermentation Kinetics and Methanogenesis Through Exploiting Diet–Microbe Interaction (2020) · cites this paper as [13]
In “Global agricultural challenges” (page not provided), the review says more feed-efficient steers require less feed to achieve the same production parameters—not that they produce more milk. In “Developing microbiome biomarkers for prediction of ruminant phenotype” (page not provided), it links rumen microbial differences to feed efficiency and suggests some may also reduce methane, but presents that connection cautiously rather than as a general trait of highly efficient animals. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Sharpea association conflicts with the cited study title
MinorThe text says Sharpea is less dense in low-methane animals, whereas the cited study describes low-methane sheep as having a Sharpea-enriched microbiome.
“density of Sharpea has been shown to be significantly lower in low methane emitting animals (Kamke et al., 2016).”
“Rumen metagenome and metatranscriptome analyses of low methane yield sheep reveals a Sharpea-enriched microbiome characterised by lactic acid formation and utilisation.”
Yu and Morrisson 2004a is cited for the wrong study
MinorThe text attributes a comparison of DNA extraction methods to Yu and Morrisson (2004a), but the listed 2004a reference concerns comparisons of gene regions for microbial fingerprinting. The bibliography lists DNA extraction under 2004b.
“With respect to DNA extraction Yu and Morrisson (2004a) evaluated three extraction techniques”
“Yu Z. Morrisson M. (2004a). Comparisons of different hypervariable regions of rrs genes for use in fingerprinting of microbial communities by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.”
Cites
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P., & Tyson, G. W. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.186072.114 · Cited by 12,496 · see citing works
Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences
Langille, M. G. I., Zaneveld, J., Caporaso, J. G., McDonald, D., Knights, D., Reyes, J. A., Clemente, J. C., Burkepile, D. E., Vega Thurber, R. L., Knight, R., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2676 · Cited by 9,116 · see citing works
KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs
Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Tanabe, M., Sato, Y., & Morishima, K. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1092 · Cited by 8,865 · see citing works
A General Framework for Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis
Zhang, B., & Horvath, S. (2005) · Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.2202/1544-6115.1128 · Cited by 5,684 · see citing works
Wang, M., Carver, J. J., Phelan, V. V., Sanchez, L. M., Garg, N., Peng, Y., Nguyen, D. D., Watrous, J., Kapono, C. A., Luzzatto-Knaan, T., et al. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3597 · Cited by 4,629 · see citing works
Microbial interactions: from networks to models
Faust, K., & Raes, J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2832 · Cited by 4,138 · see citing works
Genome-Wide Analysis in Vivo of Translation with Nucleotide Resolution Using Ribosome Profiling
Ingolia, N. T., Ghaemmaghami, S., Newman, J. R. S., & Weissman, J. S. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1168978 · Cited by 3,853 · see citing works
Caspi, R., Billington, R., Ferrer, L., Foerster, H., Fulcher, C. A., Keseler, I. M., Kothari, A., Krummenacker, M., Latendresse, M., Mueller, L. A., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1164 · Cited by 3,395 · see citing works
World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revisionPreprint
Alexandratos, N., & Bruinsma, J. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.288998 · Cited by 3,155 · see citing works
Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities
Barberán, A., Bates, S. T., Casamayor, E. O., & Fierer, N. (2012) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.119 · Cited by 3,044 · see citing works
Johnson, K. A., & Johnson, D. E. (1995) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1995.7382483x · Cited by 2,714 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The released methane, produced by rumen methanogens, is a major problem for the environment, but also a great concern to livestock production as around 2– 8% of the dietary energy can be lost to methane (CH4) production (IPCC, 2006); values as high as 12% have been reported for low quality feeds (Johnson and Johnson,…”
BackgroundInferring Correlation Networks from Genomic Survey Data
Friedman, J., & Alm, E. J. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002687 · Cited by 2,688 · see citing works
Metabolomics: the apogee of the omics trilogy
Patti, G. J., Yanes, Ó., & Siuzdak, G. E. (2012) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3314 · Cited by 2,605 · see citing works
(2013) · Cited by 2,540 · see citing works
Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment
Tyson, G. W., Chapman, J., Hugenholtz, P., Allen, E. E., Ram, R. J., Richardson, P. M., Solovyev, V. V., Rubin, E. M., Rokhsar, D. S., & Banfield, J. F. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02340 · Cited by 2,417 · see citing works
Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life
Parks, D. H., Rinke, C., Chuvochina, M., Chaumeil, P.-A., Woodcroft, B. J., Evans, P. N., Hugenholtz, P., & Tyson, G. W. (2017) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-017-0012-7 · Cited by 1,882 · see citing works
Comparing protein abundance and mRNA expression levels on a genomic scale
Greenbaum, D. (2003) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-9-117 · Cited by 1,692 · see citing works
Henderson, G., Cox, F., Ganesh, S., Jonker, A., Young, W., Collaborators, G. R. C., Abecia, L., Angarita, E., Aravena, P., Nora Arenas, G., et al. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep14567 · Cited by 1,682 · see citing works
Self-citationImproved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples
Yu, Z., & Morrison, M. D. (2004) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/04365st04 · Cited by 1,668 · see citing works
Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data
Aßhauer, K. P., Wemheuer, B., Daniel, R., & Meinicke, P. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv287 · Cited by 1,583 · see citing works
The Ruminant Animal: Digestive Physiology and Nutrition
Church, D. C. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,386 · see citing works
Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen
Hess, M., Sczyrba, A., Egan, R., Kim, T.-W., Chokhawala, H., Schroth, G., Luo, S., Clark, D. S., Chen, F., Zhang, T., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200387 · Cited by 1,319 · see citing works
Self-citationNitrogen metabolism in the rumen
Bach, A., Calsamiglia, S., & Stern, M. D. (2005) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)73133-7 · Cited by 1,311 · see citing works
Mayer, A. M., & Harel, E. (1979) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/0031-9422(79)80057-6 · Cited by 1,259 · see citing works
Stewart, E. J. (2012) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00345-12 · Cited by 1,154 · see citing works
Dowd, S. E., Callaway, T. R., Wolcott, R. D., Sun, Y., McKeehan, T., Hagevoort, R. G., & Edrington, T. S. (2008) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/1471-2180-8-125 · Cited by 1,121 · see citing works
High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models
Henry, C. S., DeJongh, M., Best, A. A., Frybarger, P. M., Linsay, B., & Stevens, R. L. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1672 · Cited by 1,090 · see citing works
Varma, A., & Palsson, B. Ø. (1994) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.60.10.3724-3731.1994 · Cited by 1,058 · see citing works
Invited review: essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation
Calsamiglia, S., Busquet, M., Cardozo, P. W., Castillejos, L., & Ferret, A. (2007) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2006-644 · Cited by 1,014 · see citing works
Exploring the bovine rumen bacterial community from birth to adulthood
Jami, E., Israel, A., Kotser, A., & Mizrahi, I. (2013) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.2 · Cited by 963 · see citing works
Self-citationEcology drives a global network of gene exchange connecting the human microbiome
Smillie, C. S., Smith, M. B., Friedman, J., Cordero, O. X., David, L. A., & Alm, E. J. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10571 · Cited by 953 · see citing works
Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli
Mahadevan, R., Edwards, J. S., & Doyle, F. J. (2002) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(02)73903-9 · Cited by 945 · see citing works
Self-citationKoskella, B. L., & Brockhurst, M. A. (2014) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12072 · Cited by 894 · see citing works
Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale
Martin, C., Morgavi, D. P., & Doreau, M. (2009) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731109990620 · Cited by 887 · see citing works
Self-citationReconstruction of biochemical networks in microorganisms
Feist, A. M., Herrgård, M. J., Thiele, I., Reed, J. L., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1949 · Cited by 859 · see citing works
Janssen, P. H. (2010) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.07.002 · Cited by 848 · see citing works
Microbiomes in light of traits: a phylogenetic perspective
Martiny, J. B. H., Jones, S. E., Lennon, J. T., & Martiny, A. C. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac9323 · Cited by 834 · see citing works
Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants.
Shabat, S. K. B., Sasson, G., Doron-Faigenboim, A., Durman, T., Yaacoby, S., Berg Miller, M. E., White, B. A., Shterzer, N., & Mizrahi, I. (2016) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.62 · Cited by 823 · see citing works
Self-citationA RAPID PROCEDURE FOR PURINE MEASUREMENT AND ITS USE FOR ESTIMATING NET RUMINAL PROTEIN SYNTHESIS
Zinn, R. A., & Owens, F. N. (1986) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/cjas86-017 · Cited by 818 · see citing works
Environmental metabolomics: a critical review and future perspectives
Bundy, J. G., Davey, M. P., & Viant, M. R. (2008) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-008-0152-0 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
Zengler, K., Toledo, G., Rappé, M., Elkins, J., Mathur, E. J., Short, J. M., & Keller, M. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.252630999 · Cited by 796 · see citing works
Microbial interactions with tannins: nutritional consequences for ruminants
McSweeney, C. S., Palmer, B., McNeill, D. M., & Krause, D. O. (2001) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(01)00232-2 · Cited by 780 · see citing works
Constraining the metabolic genotype–phenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods
Lewis, N. E., Nagarajan, H., & Palsson, B. O. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2737 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Rumen Microbial Population Dynamics during Adaptation to a High-Grain Diet
Fernando, S. C., Purvis, H. T., Najar, F. Z., Sukharnikov, L. O., Krehbiel, C. R., Nagaraja, T. G., Roe, B. A., & DeSilva, U. (2010) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00388-10 · Cited by 759 · see citing works
Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants
Morgavi, D. P., Forano, E., Martin, C., & Newbold, C. J. (2010) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731110000546 · Cited by 694 · see citing works
Self-citationStructure of the Archaeal Community of the Rumen
Janssen, P. H., & Kirs, M. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02812-07 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Network-based prediction of human tissue-specific metabolism
Shlomi, T., Cabili, M. N., Herrgård, M. J., Palsson, B. Ø., & Ruppin, E. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1487 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
The role of ciliate protozoa in the rumen
Newbold, C. J., de la Fuente, G., Belanche, A., Ramos-Morales, E., & McEwan, N. R. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01313 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
Self-citationCultivation and sequencing of rumen microbiome members from the Hungate1000 Collection
Hungate1000 project collaborators, Seshadri, R., Leahy, S. C., Attwood, G. T., Teh, K. H., Lambie, S. C., Cookson, A. L., Eloe-Fadrosh, E. A., Pavlopoulos, G. A., Hadjithomas, M., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4110 · Cited by 624 · see citing works
Self-citationMicrobial attachment and feed digestion in the rumen
McAllister, T. A., Bae, H. D., Jones, G. A., & Cheng, K.-J. (1994) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1994.72113004x · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Self-citationCaspi, R. R., Altman, T., Dreher, K. A., Fulcher, C., Subhraveti, P., Keseler, I. M., Kothari, A., Krummenacker, M., Latendresse, M., Mueller, L. A., et al. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1014 · Cited by 603 · see citing works
Membrane Vesicles: an Overlooked Component of the Matrices of Biofilms
Schooling, S. R., & Beveridge, T. J. (2006) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00257-06 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Potential role of the bovine rumen microbiome in modulating milk composition and feed efficiency
Jami, E., White, B. A., & Mizrahi, I. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085423 · Cited by 588 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Madness of Microbiome: Attempting To Find Consensus “Best Practice” for 16S Microbiome Studies
Pollock, J., Glendinning, L., Wisedchanwet, T., & Watson, M. (2018) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02627-17 · Cited by 575 · see citing works
Self-citationAssembly of 913 microbial genomes from metagenomic sequencing of the cow rumen
Stewart, R. D., Auffret, M. D., Warr, A., Wiser, A. H., Press, M. O., Langford, K. W., Liachko, I., Snelling, T. J., Dewhurst, R. J., Walker, A. W., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03317-6 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Self-citationMao, S., Zhang, M., Liu, J., & Zhu, W. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep16116 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Hristov, A. N., Oh, J., Giallongo, F., Frederick, T. W., Harper, M. T., Weeks, H. L., Branco, A. F., Moate, P. J., Deighton, M. H., Williams, S. R. O., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1504124112 · Cited by 496 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2016) and its inhibition can result in a reduction in rumen methanogenesis (up to 30%) without negative effects to the animal (Hristov et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMode and place of delivery, gastrointestinal microbiota, and their influence on asthma and atopy
van Nimwegen, F. A., Penders, J., Stobberingh, E. E., Postma, D. S., Koppelman, G. H., Kerkhof, M., Reijmerink, N. E., Dompeling, E., van den Brandt, P. A., Ferreira, I., et al. (2011) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.07.027 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Weimer, P. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00296 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Yu, Z., & Morrison, M. (2004) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.70.8.4800-4806.2004 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Wolin, M. J., Miller, T. L., & Stewart, C. S. (1997) · The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_11 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Desnoyers, M., Giger-Reverdin, S., Bertin, G., Duvaux-Ponter, C., & Sauvant, D. (2009) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1414 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
The rumen microbial metagenome associated with high methane production in cattle
Wallace, R. J., Rooke, J. A., McKain, N., Duthie, C.-A., Hyslop, J. J., Ross, D. W., Waterhouse, A., Watson, M., & Roehe, R. (2015) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-015-2032-0 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Self-citationMethane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome
Shi, W., Moon, C. D., Leahy, S. C., Kang, D., Froula, J., Kittelmann, S., Fan, C., Deutsch, S., Gagic, D., Seedorf, H., et al. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.168245.113 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Self-citationMicrobial dark matter ecogenomics reveals complex synergistic networks in a methanogenic bioreactor
Nobu, M. K., Narihiro, T., Rinke, C., Kamagata, Y., Tringe, S. G., Woyke, T., & Liu, W. (2015) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.256 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Wilmes, P., & Bond, P. L. (2004) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00687.x · Cited by 393 · see citing works
The ruminal microbiome associated with methane emissions from ruminant livestock
Tapio, I., Snelling, T. J., Strozzi, F., & Wallace, R. J. (2017) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-017-0141-0 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Self-citationLivestock metabolomics and the livestock metabolome: A systematic review
Goldansaz, S. A., Guo, A. C., Sajed, T., Steele, M. A., Plastow, G. S., & Wishart, D. S. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177675 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Microbial nutrient niches in the gut
Pereira, F. C., & Berry, D. (2016) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13659 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Gruninger, R. J., Puniya, A. K., Callaghan, T. M., Edwards, J. E., Youssef, N. H., Dagar, S. S., Fliegerova, K. O., Griffith, G. W., Forster, R. J., Tsang, A., et al. (2014) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/1574-6941.12383 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantitative aspects of ruminant digestion and metabolism
Godwin, I. R. (1994) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/0377-8401(94)90018-3 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Community structures of fecal bacteria in cattle from different animal feeding operations
Shanks, O. C., Kelty, C. A., Archibeque, S., Jenkins, M., Newton, R. J., McLellan, S. L., Huse, S. M., & Sogin, M. L. (2011) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02988-10 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Roehe, R., Dewhurst, R. J., Duthie, C.-A., Rooke, J. A., McKain, N., Ross, D. W., Hyslop, J. J., Waterhouse, A., Freeman, T. C., Watson, M., et al. (2016) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005846 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Self-citationKim, M., Morrison, M., & Yu, Z. (2010) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.020 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Ionophore resistance of ruminal bacteria and its potential impact on human health
Russell, J. B., & Houlihan, A. J. (2003) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(03)00019-6 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Monensin Mode of Action in the Rumen
Schelling, G. T. (1984) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas1984.5861518x · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Mode of action of the yeast<i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>as a feed additive for ruminants
Newbold, C. J., Wallace, R. J., & Mcintosh, F. M. (1996) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19960029 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, F., & Guan, L. L. (2017) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00061-17 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Self-citationDuin, E. C., Wagner, T., Shima, S., Prakash, D., Cronin, B., Yáñez-Ruiz, D. R., Duval, S., Rümbeli, R., Stemmler, R. T., Thauer, R. K., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1600298113 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Kamke, J., Kittelmann, S., Soni, P., Li, Y., Tavendale, M., Ganesh, S., Janssen, P. H., Shi, W., Froula, J., Rubin, E. M., et al. (2016) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0201-2 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Self-citationDietary phytochemicals as rumen modifiers: a review of the effects on microbial populations
Patra, A. K., & Saxena, J. (2009) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/s10482-009-9364-1 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Manipulating rumen microbiome and fermentation through interventions during early life: a review
Yáñez-Ruiz, D. R., Abecia, L., & Newbold, C. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01133 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Self-citationIntestinal IgA production and its role in host-microbe interaction
Gutzeit, C., Magri, G., & Cerutti, A. (2014) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12189 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
The cornell net carbohydrate and protein system: updates to the model and evaluation of version 6.5
Van Amburgh, M. E., Collao-Saenz, E. A., Higgs, R. J., Ross, D. A., Recktenwald, E. B., Raffrenato, E., Chase, L. E., Overton, T. R., Mills, J. K., & Foskolos, A. (2015) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-9378 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Couvreur, S., Hurtaud, C., Lopez, C., Delaby, L., & Peyraud, J. L. (2006) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72263-9 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Patra, A. K., & Saxena, J. (2009) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1017/s0954422409990163 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Leahy, S. C., Kelly, W. J., Altermann, E., Ronimus, R. S., Yeoman, C. J., Pacheco, D. M., Li, D., Kong, Z., McTavish, S. M., Sang, C., et al. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008926 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Self-citationStoichiometric interpretation of Escherichia coli glucose catabolism under various oxygenation rates
Varma, A., Boesch, B. W., & Palsson, B. O. (1993) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.59.8.2465-2473.1993 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Establishment of ruminal bacterial community in dairy calves from birth to weaning is sequential
Rey, M., Enjalbert, F., Combes, S., Cauquil, L., Bouchez, O., & Monteils, V. (2014) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.12405 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Williams, A. G., & Coleman, G. S. (1992) · Brock/Springer series in contemporary bioscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2776-2 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Early-branching gut fungi possess a large, comprehensive array of biomass-degrading enzymes
Solomon, K. V., Haitjema, C. H., Henske, J. K., Gilmore, S. P., Borges-Rivera, D., Lipzen, A., Brewer, H. M., Purvine, S. O., Wright, A. T., Theodorou, M. K., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad1431 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Health and growth of veal calves fed milk replacers with or without probiotics
Timmerman, H. M., Mulder, L., Everts, H., van Espen, D. C., van der Wal, E., Klaassen, G., Rouwers, S. M. G., Hartemink, R., Rombouts, F. M., & Beynen, A. C. (2005) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)72891-5 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Cross-species comparisons of host genetic associations with the microbiome
Goodrich, J. K., Davenport, E., Waters, J. L., Clark, A. G., & Ley, R. E. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad9379 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Belanche, A., Doreau, M., Edwards, J. E., Moorby, J. M., Pinloche, E., & Newbold, C. J. (2012) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.112.159574 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Self-citationAssociation of methanogenic bacteria with rumen ciliates
Vogels, G. D., Hoppe, W. F., & Stumm, C. K. (1980) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.40.3.608-612.1980 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Malmuthuge, N., Griebel, P. J., & Guan, L. L. (2015) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2015.00036 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Self-citationAspects of rumen microbiology central to mechanistic modelling of methane production in cattle
ELLIS, J. L., DIJKSTRA, J., KEBREAB, E., BANNINK, A., ODONGO, N. E., McBRIDE, B. W., & FRANCE, J. (2008) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859608007752 · Cited by 274 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These models represent relevant aspects that determine the nutritional and emission responses for a given diet but do not attempt to provide a detailed description of the microbiota or its function (Ellis et al., 2008).”
BackgroundMetabolism of nitrogen-containing compounds
Wallace, R. J., Onodera, R., & Cotta, M. A. (1997) · The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_7 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Weimer, P. J., Stevenson, D. M., Mantovani, H. C., & Man, S. L. C. (2010) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3500 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Self-citationLesmeister, K. E., Heinrichs, A. J., & Gabler, M. T. (2004) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73340-8 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Mao, S., Huo, W., & Zhu, W. (2016) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12724 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
González, L. A., Manteca, X., Calsamiglia, S., Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S., & Ferret, A. (2012) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.12.009 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Malmuthuge, N., Griebel, P. J., & Guan, L. L. (2014) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.03864-13 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Self-citationInfluence of foliage from African multipurpose trees on activity of rumen protozoa and bacteria
Newbold, C. J., El Hassan, S. M., Wang*, J., Ortega, M. E., & Wallace, R. J. (1997) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19970143 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Self-citationDai, X., Tian, Y., Li, J., Su, X., Wang, X., Zhao, S., Liu, L., Luo, Y., Liu, D., Zheng, H., et al. (2014) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.03682-14 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
A metabolomics approach to uncover the effects of grain diets on rumen health in dairy cows
Saleem, F., Ametaj, B. N., Bouatra, S., Mandal, R., Zebeli, Q., Dunn, S. M., & Wishart, D. S. (2012) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2012-5403 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Reticulate Representation of Evolutionary and Functional Relationships between Phage Genomes
Lima‐Mendez, G., van Helden, J., Toussaint, A., & Leplae, R. (2008) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msn023 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Jones, R. J., & Megarrity, R. (1986) · Australian Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1751-0813.1986.tb02990.x · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Low-methane yield sheep have smaller rumens and shorter rumen retention time
Goopy, J. P., Donaldson, A., Hegarty, R., Vercoe, P. E., Haynes, F., Barnett, M., & Oddy, V. H. (2014) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114513002936 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Heritability estimates of methane emissions from sheep
Pinares-Patiño, C. S., Hickey, S. M., Young, E. A., Dodds, K. G., MacLean, S., Molano, G., Sandoval, E., Kjestrup, H., Harland, R., Hunt, C., et al. (2013) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731113000864 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Isolation of Succinivibrionaceae Implicated in Low Methane Emissions from Tammar Wallabies
Pope, P. B., Smith, W. J. M., Denman, S. E., Tringe, S. G., Barry, K., Hugenholtz, P., McSweeney, C. S., McHardy, A. C., & Morrison, M. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1205760 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Self-citationEffect of Direct-Fed Microbials on Rumen Microbial Fermentation
Martin, S. A., & Nisbet, D. J. (1992) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(92)77932-6 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Computational methods for discovering gene networks from expression data
Lee, W.-P., & Tzou, W. (2009) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbp028 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Sasson, G., Kruger Ben-Shabat, S., Seroussi, E., Doron-Faigenboim, A., Shterzer, N., Yaacoby, S., Berg Miller, M. E., White, B. A., Halperin, E., & Mizrahi, I. (2017) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00703-17 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Self-citationAdai, A. T., Date, S. V., Wieland, S. C., & Marcotte, E. M. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.04.047 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Auffret, M. D., Dewhurst, R. J., Duthie, C.-A., Rooke, J. A., Wallace, R. J., Freeman, T. C., Stewart, R., Watson, M., & Roehe, R. (2017) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0378-z · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationReducing rumen methane emissions through elimination of rumen protozoa
Hegarty, R. S. (1999) · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1071/ar99008 · Cited by 213 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In addition to their capacity to degrade fiber, protozoa have been linked to methanogenesis as defaunation reduces methane output by approximately 11% (Hegarty, 1999; Morgavi et al., 2010; Newbold et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMachebœuf, D., Morgavi, D. P., Papon, Y., Mousset, J. L., & Schaan, M. A. (2007) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.044 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Self-citationAmetaj, B. N., Zebeli, Q., Saleem, F., Psychogios, N., Lewis, M., Dunn, S. M., Xia, J., & Wishart, D. S. (2010) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-010-0227-6 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Hernandez-Sanabria, E., Goonewardene, L. A., Wang, Z., Durunna, O. N., Moore, S. S., & Guan, L. L. (2012) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.05114-11 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Self-citationResidual intake and body weight gain: A new measure of efficiency in growing cattle
Berry, D. P., & Crowley, J. J. (2011) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4245 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
A Review of bioinformatics tools for bio-prospecting from metagenomic sequence data
Roumpeka, D. D., Wallace, R. J., Escalettes, F., Fotheringham, I., & Watson, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2017.00023 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Self-citationMetabolomics of Four Biofluids from Dairy Cows: Potential Biomarkers for Milk Production and Quality
Sun, H., Wang, D., Wang, B., Wang, J., Liu, H., Guan, L. L., & Liu, J. (2015) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr501305g · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Self-citationMuth, T., Behne, A., Heyer, R., Kohrs, F., Benndorf, D., Hoffmann, M., Lehtevä, M., Reichl, U., Martens, L., & Rapp, E. (2015) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr501246w · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Zhang, J., Shi, H., Wang, Y., Li, S., Cao, Z., Ji, S., He, Y., & Zhang, H. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02206 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Desirable characteristics of forage legumes for improving protein utilization in ruminants
Broderick, G. A. (1995) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1995.7392760x · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Direct Cellular Lysis/Protein Extraction Protocol for Soil Metaproteomics
Chourey, K., Jansson, J. K., VerBerkmoes, N. C., Shah, M. B., Chavarría, K. L., Tom, L. M., Brodie, E., & Hettich, R. L. (2010) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr100787q · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Characterizing the microbiota across the gastrointestinal tract of a Brazilian Nelore steer
de Oliveira, M. N. V., Jewell, K. A., Freitas, F. S., Benjamin, L. A., Tótola, M. R., Borges, A. C., Moraes, C. A., & Suen, G. (2013) · Veterinary Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.02.013 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Self-citationComtet-Marre, S., Parisot, N., Lepercq, P., Chaucheyras‐Durand, F., Mosoni, P., Peyretaillade, É., Bayat, A. R., Shingfield, K. J., Peyret, P., & Forano, É. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00067 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
The use of direct-fed microbials for mitigation of ruminant methane emissions: a review
Jeyanathan, J., Martin, C., & Morgavi, D. P. (2014) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731113002085 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Self-citationCsárdi, G., Franks, A., Choi, D. S., Airoldi, E. M., & Drummond, D. A. (2015) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005206 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
A road map for the development of community systems (CoSy) biology
Zengler, K., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2763 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Leng, R. A. (2014) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an13381 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Klaassens, E. S., de Vos, W. M., & Vaughan, E. E. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01921-06 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Sugimoto, S., Sato, F., Miyakawa, R., Chiba, A., Onodera, S., Hori, S., & Mizunoe, Y. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20485-z · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Thomas, M., Webb, M. J., Ghimire, S., Blair, A. D., Olson, K. C., Fenske, G. J., Fonder, A. T., Christopher‐Hennings, J., Brake, D. W., & Scaria, J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12481-6 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Seedorf, H., Kittelmann, S., Henderson, G., & Janssen, P. H. (2014) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.494 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Animal-to-animal variation in fecal microbial diversity among beef cattle
Durso, L. M., Harhay, G. P., Smith, T. P. L., Bono, J. L., DeSantis, T. Z., Harhay, D. M., Andersen, G. L., Keen, J. E., Laegreid, W. W., & Clawson, M. L. (2010) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00207-10 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Yeoman, C. J., Ishaq, S. L., Bichi, E., Olivo, S. K., Lowe, J., & Aldridge, B. M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21440-8 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Signorini, M. L., Soto, L. P., Zbrun, M. V., Sequeira, G. J., Rosmini, M. R., & Frizzo, L. S. (2012) · Research in Veterinary Science · doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.05.001 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Plant‐mediated lipolysis and proteolysis in red clover with different polyphenol oxidase activities
Lee, M. R. F., Winters, A. L., Scollan, N. D., Dewhurst, R. J., Theodorou, M. K., & Minchin, F. R. (2004) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.1854 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Self-citationSvartström, O., Alneberg, J., Terrapon, N., Lombard, V., de Bruijn, I., Malmsten, J., Dalin, A.-M., EL Muller, E., Shah, P., Wilmes, P., et al. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2017.108 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
CowPI: a rumen microbiome focussed version of the PICRUSt functional inference software
Wilkinson, T. J., Huws, S. A., Edwards, J. E., Kingston-Smith, A. H., Siu-Ting, K., Hughes, M., Rubino, F., Friedersdorff, M., & Creevey, C. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01095 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationKloesges, T., Popa, O., Martin, W. F., & Dagan, T. (2010) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msq297 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Jayanegara, A., Sarwono, K. A., Kondo, M., Matsui, H., Ridla, M., Laconi, E. B., & Nahrowi (2018) · Italian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1080/1828051x.2017.1404945 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Orpin, C. G. (1977) · Journal of General Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-99-1-107 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Nucleic acid metabolism in the ruminant
McAllan, A. B., & Smith, R. H. (1969) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19690075 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Temporal dynamics of the metabolically active rumen bacteria colonizing fresh perennial ryegrass
Huws, S., Edwards, J. E., Creevey, C. J., Stevens, P. R., Lin, W., Girdwood, S. E., Pachebat, J. A., & Kingston‐Smith, A. H. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1093/femsec/fiv137 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Self-citationHuws, S. A., Edwards, J. E., Kim, E. J., & Scollan, N. D. (2007) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2007.06.013 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Self-citationThe bovine ruminal fluid metabolome
Saleem, F., Bouatra, S., Guo, A. C., Psychogios, N., Mandal, R., Dunn, S. M., Ametaj, B. N., & Wishart, D. S. (2013) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-012-0458-9 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
The role of anaerobic gut fungi in ruminants
Gordon, G. L. R., & Phillips, M. W. (1998) · Nutrition Research Reviews · doi:10.1079/nrr19980009 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Study of methanogen communities associated with different rumen protozoal populations
Belanche, A., de la Fuente, G., & Newbold, C. J. (2014) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/1574-6941.12423 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citationInteractions of DNA with Biofilm-Derived Membrane Vesicles
Schooling, S. R., Hubley, A., & Beveridge, T. J. (2009) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00717-08 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
PINARES-PATIÑO, C. S., ULYATT, M. J., LASSEY, K. R., BARRY, T. N., & HOLMES, C. W. (2003) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859603003046 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Aite, M., Chevallier, M., Frioux, C., Trottier, C., Got, J., Cortés, M. P., Mendoza, S. N., Carrier, G., Dameron, O., Guillaudeux, N., et al. (2018) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006146 · Cited by 137 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2009), and on dedicated software (Henry et al., 2010; Aite et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMacRae, J. C., & Ulyatt, M. J. (1974) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859600059207 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Weaning age influences the severity of gastrointestinal microbiome shifts in dairy calves
Meale, S. J., Li, S. C., Azevedo, P., Derakhshani, H., DeVries, T. J., Plaizier, J. C., Steele, M. A., & Khafipour, E. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00223-7 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Abecia, L., Toral, P. G., Martín-García, A. I., Martı́nez, G., Tomkins, N. W., Molina‐Alcaide, E., Newbold, C. J., & Yáñez-Ruíz, D. R. (2012) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4831 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Self-citationBeitel, C. W., Froenicke, L., Lang, J., Korf, I. F., Michelmore, R. W., Eisen, J. A., & Darling, A. E. (2014) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.415 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Edwards, J. E., Forster, R. J., Callaghan, T. M., Dollhofer, V., Dagar, S. S., Cheng, Y., Chang, J., Kittelmann, S., Fliegerova, K., Puniya, A. K., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01657 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationAdherent epithelial bacteria in ruminants and their roles in digestive tract function
Cheng, K., McCowan, R., & Costerton, J. (1979) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/32.1.139 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Forage type and fish oil cause shifts in rumen bacterial diversity
Huws, S., Lee, M. R. F., Muetzel, S., Scott, M. B., Wallace, R. J., & Scollan, N. D. (2010) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00892.x · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationOral Samples as non-invasive proxies for assessing the composition of the rumen microbial community
Tapio, I., Shingfield, K. J., McKain, N., Bonin, A., Fischer, D., Bayat, A. R., Vilkki, J., Taberlet, P., Snelling, T. J., & Wallace, R. J. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151220 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationMetabolic network modeling of microbial communities
Biggs, M. B., Medlock, G. L., Kolling, G. L., & Papin, J. A. (2015) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1308 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Adherent rumen bacteria — their role in the digestion of plant material, urea and epithelial cells
Cheng, K.-J., & Costerton, J. W. (1980) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-8067-2_11 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Rumen fluid metabolomics analysis associated with feed efficiency on crossbred steers
Artegoitia, V. M., Foote, A. P., Lewis, R. M., & Freetly, H. C. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02856-0 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Kittelmann, S., & Janssen, P. H. (2010) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.01022.x · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Wu, L., Wang, H., Zhang, Z., Lin, R., Zhang, Z., & Lin, W. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020611 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Abecia, L., Martín-García, A. I., Martı́nez, G., Newbold, C. J., & Yáñez-Ruíz, D. R. (2013) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2012-6142 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citationBeneficial Microorganisms in Multicellular Life Forms
ROSENBERG, E. B., & Gophna, U. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21680-0 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Influence of dietary concentrate to forage ratio on the development of rumen mucosa in calves
Žitnan, R., Voigt, J., Schönhusen, U., Wegner, J., Kokardová, M., Hagemeister, H., Levkut, M., Kuhla, S., & Sommer, A. (1998) · Archiv für Tierernaehrung · doi:10.1080/17450399809381926 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
InterMine: extensive web services for modern biology
Kalderimis, A., Lyne, R., Butano, D., Contrino, S., Lyne, M., Heimbach, J., Hu, F., Smith, R. N., Štěpán, R., Sullivan, J. M., et al. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku301 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Distribution of anaerobic fungi in the digestive tract of cattle and their survival in faeces
Davies, D. R., Theodorou, M. K., Lawrence, M. I. G., & Trinci, A. P. J. (1993) · Journal of General Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-139-6-1395 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Pasture feeding changes the bovine rumen and milk metabolome
O’Callaghan, T., Vázquez-Fresno, R., Serra-Cayuela, A., Dong, E., Mandal, R., Hennessy, D., McAuliffe, S., Dillon, P., Wishart, D., Stanton, C., et al. (2018) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo8020027 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Williams, A. G., & Coleman, G. S. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_3 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Song, Y., Malmuthuge, N., Steele, M. A., & Guan, L. L. (2017) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1093/femsec/fix179 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, J., Fan, H., Han, Y., Zhao, J., & Zhou, Z. (2016) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.16.0166 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Frey, J. C., Pell, A. N., Berthiaume, R., Lapierre, H., Lee, S., Ha, J. K., Mendell, J. E., & Angert, E. R. (2009) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04602.x · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Kenters, N., Henderson, G., Jeyanathan, J., Kittelmann, S., & Janssen, P. H. (2011) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2010.10.011 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Michalet-Doreau, B., Fernandez, I., Peyron, C., Millet, L., & Fonty, G. (2001) · Reproduction Nutrition Development · doi:10.1051/rnd:2001122 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Broderick, G. A., & Reynal, S. M. (2009) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1865 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Edwards, J. E., Huws, S. A., Kim, E. J., & Kingston-Smith, A. H. (2007) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00392.x · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citationPress, M. O., Wiser, A. H., Kronenberg, Z. N., Langford, K. W., Shakya, M., Lo, C.-C., Mueller, K. A., Sullivan, S. T., Chain, P. S. G., & Liachko, I. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/198713 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Rubino, F., Carberry, C., Waters, S. M., Kenny, D., McCabe, M. S., & Creevey, C. J. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.172 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationCarberry, C. A., Waters, S. M., Kenny, D. A., & Creevey, C. J. (2014) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.03131-13 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citationWallace, R. J., Rooke, J. A., Duthie, C.-A., Hyslop, J. J., Ross, D. W., McKain, N., de Souza, S. M., Snelling, T. J., Waterhouse, A., & Roehe, R. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep05892 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citationPatra, A. K. (2010) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.4143 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Does the complexity of the rumen microbial ecology preclude methane mitigation?
Wright, A. G., & Klieve, A. V. (2011) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.015 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Zhao, S., Li, G., Zheng, N., Wang, J., & Yu, Z. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.024 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Yáñez-Ruiz, D. R., Macías, B., Pinloche, E., & Newbold, C. J. (2010) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00852.x · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationShaani, Y., Zehavi, T., Eyal, S., Miron, J., & Mizrahi, I. (2018) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-018-0203-0 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citationKnight, T. W., Ronimus, R. S., Dey, D., Tootill, C. M., Naylor, G. E., Evans, P. N., Molano, G., Smith, A. H., Tavendale, M. H., Pinares-Patiño, C. S., et al. (2011) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.059 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Lee, S. S., Ha, J. K., & Cheng, K.-J. (2000) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(00)00216-9 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Weimer, P. J., Cox, M. S., Vieira de Paula, T., Lin, M., Hall, M. B., & Suen, G. (2017) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-12746 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationInvasion of Plant Tissue in the Rumen by the Flagellate Neocallimastix frontalis
Orpin, C. G. (1977) · Journal of General Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-98-2-423 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Forage polyphenol oxidase and ruminant livestock nutrition
Lee, M. R. F. (2014) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00694 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Longitudinal Prediction of the Infant Gut Microbiome with Dynamic Bayesian Networks
McGeachie, M. J., Sordillo, J. E., Gibson, T. E., Weinstock, G. M., Liu, Y., Gold, D. R., Weiss, S. T., & Litonjua, A. A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep20359 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Review: Utilization of yeast of Saccharomyces cerevisiae origin in artificially raised calves
Alugongo, G. M., Xiao, J., Wu, Z., Li, S., Wang, Y., & Cao, Z. (2017) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-017-0165-5 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Distribution and estimation of anaerobic zoosporic fungi along the digestive tracts of sheep
Rezaeian, M., Beakes, G. W., & Parker, D. S. (2004) · Mycological Research · doi:10.1017/s0953756204000929 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Auffret, M. D., Stewart, R., Dewhurst, R. J., Duthie, C.-A., Rooke, J. A., Wallace, R. J., Freeman, T. C., Snelling, T. J., Watson, M., & Roehe, R. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02642 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 299 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Gruby, 1843, Recherches ser des animalcules se de veloppant en grand nombre dans l'estomac et dans les intestins, pedant la digestion des animaux herbivores et carnivores, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., 17, 1304
- Hristov, 2013, Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production. A review of options for non-CO2 emissions, 226
- Hungate, 1966, The Rumen and its Microbes
- 2006, Guidelines for National Greenhouse Inventories
- Russell, 1993, Microbial energetics
- 2015, World Food Programme Hunger Map
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beauchemin, K. A., Ungerfeld, E. M., Eckard, R. J., & Wang, M. (2020) · Animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731119003100 · Cited by 619 · see citing works
Stewart, R. D., Auffret, M. D., Warr, A., Walker, A. W., Roehe, R., & Watson, M. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0202-3 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Self-citationThe rumen microbiome: balancing food security and environmental impacts
Mizrahi, I., Wallace, R. J., & Moraïs, S. (2021) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00543-6 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Self-citationInvited review: current enteric methane mitigation options
Beauchemin, K. A., Ungerfeld, E. M., Abdalla, A. L., Alvarez, C., Arndt, C., Becquet, P., Benchaar, C., Berndt, A., Mauricio, R. M., McAllister, T. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2022-22091 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Self-citationReview: Ruminal microbiome and microbial metabolome: effects of diet and ruminant host
Newbold, C. J., & Ramos‐Morales, E. (2020) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731119003252 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Self-citationRole of Secondary Plant Metabolites on Enteric Methane Mitigation in Ruminants
Kú-Vera, J. C., Jiménez‐Ocampo, R., Valencia-Salazar, S. S., Montoya-Flores, M. D., Molina-Botero, I. C., Arango, J., Gómez, C., Aguilar-Pérez, C. F., & Solorio‐Sánchez, F. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.00584 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Cattle Production and Health: Driver or Passenger?
O’Hara, E., Neves, A. L. A., Song, Y., & Guan, L. L. (2020) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083952 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Self-citationFurman, O., Shenhav, L., Sasson, G., Kokou, F., Honig, H. H., Jacoby, S., Hertz, T., Cordero, O. X., Halperin, E., & Mizrahi, I. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15652-8 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Self-citationSeaweed and Seaweed Bioactives for Mitigation of Enteric Methane: Challenges and Opportunities
Abbott, D. W., Aasen, I. M., Beauchemin, K. A., Gröndahl, F., Gruninger, R. J., Hayes, M., Huws, S., Kenny, D. A., Krizsan, S. J., Kirwan, S. F., et al. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122432 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Impact of Plant Phytochemicals on the Gut Microbiota of Humans for a Balanced Life
Santhiravel, S., Bekhit, A. E. A., Mendis, E., Jacobs, J. L., Dunshea, F. R., Rajapakse, N., & Ponnampalam, E. N. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23158124 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Bekhit, A. E. A., Giteru, S. G., Holman, B. W. B., & Hopkins, D. L. (2021) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12764 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Hassan, F.-U., Arshad, M. A., Ebeid, H. M., Rehman, M. S.-U., Khan, M. S., Shahid, S., & Yang, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.575801 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Liang, J., Nabi, M., Zhang, P., Zhang, G., Cai, Y., Wang, Q., Zhou, Z., & Ding, Y. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110335 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Advances in Microbiome Research for Animal Health
Peixoto, R. S., Harkins, D. M., & Nelson, K. E. (2020) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-091020-075907 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Saponin-induced shifts in the rumen microbiome and metabolome of young cattle
Wang, B., Ma, M. P., Diao, Q. Y., & Tu, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00356 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Characterization of antibiotic resistance genes in the species of the rumen microbiota
Sabino, Y. N. V., Santana, M., Oyama, L., Santos, F. G., Moreira, A., Huws, S., & Mantovani, H. C. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13118-0 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationGlobal Warming and Dairy Cattle: How to Control and Reduce Methane Emission
Bačėninaitė, D., Džermeikaitė, K., & Antanaitis, R. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12192687 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Gruninger, R. J., Ribeiro, G. O., Cameron, A., & McAllister, T. A. (2019) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731119000752 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationAnaerobic Fungi: Past, Present, and Future
Hess, M., Paul, S. S., Puniya, A. K., van der Giezen, M., Shaw, C. A., Edwards, J. E., & Fliegerova, K. O. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.584893 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentification of rumen microbial biomarkers linked to methane emission in Holstein dairy cows
Ramayo‐Caldas, Y., Zingaretti, L. M., Popova, M., Estellé, J., Bernard, A., Pons, N., Bellot, P., Mach, N., Rau, A., Roume, H., et al. (2019) · Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics · doi:10.1111/jbg.12427 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationVargas, J. E., Andrés, S., López-Ferreras, L., Snelling, T. J., Yáñez-Ruíz, D. R., García-Estrada, C., & López, S. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58401-z · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationInterrogating the viral dark matter of the rumen ecosystem with a global virome database
Yan, M., Pratama, A. A., Somasundaram, S., Li, Z., Jiang, Y., Sullivan, M. B., & Yu, Z. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41075-2 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Martínez-Álvaro, M., Auffret, M. D., Stewart, R. D., Dewhurst, R. J., Duthie, C.-A., Rooke, J. A., Wallace, R. J., Shih, B. B.-J., Freeman, T. C., Watson, M., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00659 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopment of the duodenal, ileal, jejunal and caecal microbiota in chickens
Glendinning, L., Watson, K., & Watson, M. (2019) · Animal Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s42523-019-0017-z · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationCan rumen bacteria communicate to each other?
Won, M., Oyama, L. B., Courtney, S. J., Creevey, C. J., & Huws, S. (2020) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00796-y · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationFibre digestion by rumen microbiota — a review of recent metagenomic and metatranscriptomic studies
Terry, S. A., Badhan, A., Wang, Y., Chaves, A. V., & McAllister, T. A. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1139/cjas-2019-0024 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationInfluence of host genetics in shaping the rumen bacterial community in beef cattle
Abbas, W., Howard, J., Paz, H. A., Hales, K. E., Wells, J. E., Kuehn, L. A., Erickson, G. E., Spangler, M. L., & Fernando, S. C. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72011-9 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Lima, J., Auffret, M. D., Stewart, R. D., Dewhurst, R. J., Duthie, C.-A., Snelling, T. J., Walker, A. W., Freeman, T. C., Watson, M., & Roehe, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00701 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationMetagenomic analysis of the cow, sheep, reindeer and red deer rumen
Glendinning, L., Genç, B., Wallace, R. J., & Watson, M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81668-9 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationSapountzis, P., Segura, A., Desvaux, M., & Forano, E. (2020) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms8060877 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Cui, Y., Liu, H., Gao, Z., Xu, J., Liu, B., Guo, M., Yang, X., Niu, J., Zhu, X., Ma, S., et al. (2022) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-022-11956-5 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Animal board invited review: Grassland-based livestock farming and biodiversity
Fraser, M. D., Vallin, H., & Roberts, B. P. (2022) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2022.100671 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Morgavi, D. P., Cantalapiedra-Hijar, G., Eugène, M., Martin, C., Nozière, P., Popova, M., Marty, I. O., Muñoz‐Tamayo, R., & Ungerfeld, E. M. (2023) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2023.100830 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationLiang, J., Zhang, R., Chang, J., Chen, L., Nabi, M., Zhang, H., Zhang, G., & Zhang, P. (2024) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2024.108308 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
OMICS and Other Advanced Technologies in Mycological Applications
Wijayawardene, N., Boonyuen, N., Ranaweera, C., de Zoysa, H. K. S., Padmathilake, R. E., Nifla, F., Dai, D.-Q., Liu, Y., Suwannarach, N., Kumla, J., et al. (2023) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof9060688 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Palma‐Hidalgo, J. M., Jiménez, E., Popova, M., Morgavi, D. P., Martín-García, A. I., Yáñez-Ruíz, D. R., & Belanche, A. (2021) · Animal Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s42523-021-00073-9 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationRobinson, K., Becker, S. R., Xiao, Y., Lyu, W., Yang, Q., Zhu, H., Yang, H., Zhao, J., & Zhang, G. (2019) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms7090282 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Understanding Mechanisms of Plant Tolerance and Response to Aluminum Toxicity
Wei, Y., Han, R., Xie, Y., Jiang, C., & Yong-xiong, Y. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13041782 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Rumen Virus Populations: Technological Advances Enhancing Current Understanding
Gilbert, R. A., Townsend, E. M., Crew, K. S., Hitch, T. C. A., Friedersdorff, J. C. A., Creevey, C. J., Pope, P. B., Ouwerkerk, D., & Jameson, E. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00450 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationAnderson, C. L., & Fernando, S. C. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02331-7 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Exploring AI-2-mediated interspecies communications within rumen microbial communities
Liu, X., Liu, Q., Sun, S., Sun, H., Wang, Y., Shen, X., & Zhang, L. (2022) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-022-01367-z · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Yin, X., Ji, S., Duan, C., Tian, P., Ju, S., Yan, H., Zhang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.679135 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Aguilar-Marín, S. B., Betancur-Murillo, C. L., Isaza, G. A., Mesa, H., & Jovel, J. (2020) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-020-02037-6 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Automated food safety early warning system in the dairy supply chain using machine learning
Liu, N., Bouzembrak, Y., van den Bulk, L. M., Gavai, A., van den Heuvel, L. J., & Marvin, H. J. P. (2022) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.108872 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
In Pursuit of Understanding the Rumen Microbiome
Sanjorjo, R. A., Tseten, T., Kang, M., Kwon, M., & Kim, S.-W. (2023) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation9020114 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Guo, W., Zhou, M., Ma, T., Bi, S., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., Huang, X., Guan, L. L., & Long, R. (2020) · Animal Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s42523-020-00042-8 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationConcepts and Consequences of a Core Gut Microbiota for Animal Growth and Development
Perlman, D., Martínez-Álvaro, M., Moraïs, S., Altshuler, I., Hagen, L. H., Jami, E., Roehe, R., Pope, P. B., & Mizrahi, I. (2021) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-013020-020412 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationMu, Y., Qi, W., Zhang, T., Zhang, J., & Mao, S. (2022) · mSystems · doi:10.1128/msystems.01490-21 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Smith, R. H., Glendinning, L., Walker, A. W., & Watson, M. (2022) · Animal Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s42523-022-00207-7 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationHinsu, A., Tulsani, N. J., Panchal, K., Pandit, R. J., Jyotsana, B., Dafale, N. A., Patil, N. V., Purohit, H. J., Joshi, C. G., & Jakhesara, S. J. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-88943-9 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Hou, Q., & Kolodkin‐Gal, I. (2020) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1093/femsec/fiaa142 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Perilla frutescens Leaf Alters the Rumen Microbial Community of Lactating Dairy Cows
Sun, Z., Yu, Z., & Wang, B. (2019) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms7110562 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Amat, S., Holman, D. B., Schmidt, K. N., Menezes, A. C. B., Baumgaertner, F., Winders, T., Kirsch, J. D., Liu, T., Schwinghamer, T. D., Sedivec, K. K. K., et al. (2021) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms9102011 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Cortés, A., Wills, J., Su, X.-P., Hewitt, R. E., Robertson, J., Scotti, R., Price, D., Bartley, Y., McNeilly, T., Krause, L., et al. (2019) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00818-9 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Park, T., Ma, L., Ma, Y., Zhou, X., Bu, D., & Yu, Z. (2020) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-020-00461-2 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Elekwachi, C. O., Wang, Z., Wu, X., Rabee, A., & Forster, R. J. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01814 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Legume-Modified Rotations Deliver Nutrition With Lower Environmental Impact
Costa, M. P., Reckling, M., Chadwick, D. R., Rees, R. M., Saget, S., Williams, M., & Styles, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2021.656005 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Opportunities and limits of combining microbiome and genome data for complex trait prediction
Miguel Pérez-enciso, A., Zingaretti, L. M., Ramayo‐Caldas, Y., & Campos, G. D. L. (2021) · Genetics Selection Evolution · doi:10.1186/s12711-021-00658-7 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Chaucheyras‐Durand, F., Ameilbonne, A., Auffret, P., Bernard, M., Mialon, M., Dunière, L., & Forano, É. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55825-0 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Li, Z., Mu, C., Xu, Y., Shen, J., & Zhu, W. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00244 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Lobo, R. R., & Faciola, A. P. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.763416 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Waters, S. M., Roskam, E., Smith, P. E., Kenny, D. A., Popova, M., Eugène, M., & Morgavi, D. P. (2025) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2024-25778 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationMaturation of the Goat Rumen Microbiota Involves Three Stages of Microbial Colonization
Zhang, K., Li, B., Guo, M., Liu, G., Yang, Y., Wang, X., Chen, Y., & Zhang, E. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9121028 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Ribeiro, D. M., Salama, A. A. K., Vitor, A. C., Henríquez, A. A., Moncau, C. T., Santos, E. M., Caja, G., de Oliveira, J. S., Balieiro, J. C. D. C., Hernández-Castellano, L. E., et al. (2020) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103905 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
McGurrin, A., Maguire, J., Tiwari, B. K., & García‐Vaquero, M. (2023) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-023-00946-w · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Yan, M., & Yu, Z. (2024) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-024-01791-3 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Belanche, A., Bannink, A., Dijkstra, J., Durmic, Z., García, F. J. G., dos Santos, F. G., Huws, S., Jeyanathan, J., Lund, P., Mackie, R. I., et al. (2024) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2024-25046 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, Y., Nan, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., Jiang, L., & Xiong, B. (2020) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01908-20 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Ge, T., Yang, C., Li, B., Huang, X., Zhao, L., Zhang, X., Tian, L., & Zhang, E. (2023) · BMC Veterinary Research · doi:10.1186/s12917-023-03592-6 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Rumen metaproteomics: Closer to linking rumen microbial function to animal productivity traits
Andersen, T. O., Kunath, B. J., Hagen, L. H., Arntzen, M. Ø., & Pope, P. B. (2020) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.07.011 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Guo, J., Li, P., Zhang, K., Zhang, L., Wang, X., Li, L., & Zhang, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.584742 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Kumar, K. S. V., Dey, A., Rose, M. K., & Dahiya, S. S. (2022) · Antioxidants · doi:10.3390/antiox11020325 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
The inhibition of high ammonia to in vitro rumen fermentation is pH dependent
Shen, J., Zheng, W., Xu, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1163021 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Wang, D., Tang, G., Zhao, L., Wang, M., Chen, L., Zhao, C., Liang, Z., Chen, J., Cao, Y., & Yao, J. (2023) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-023-00850-3 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Mulkern, A. J., Oyama, L. B., Cookson, A., Creevey, C. J., Wilkinson, T., Olleik, H., Maresca, M., da Silva, G. C., Fontes, P. P., Bazzolli, D. M. S., et al. (2022) · npj Biofilms and Microbiomes · doi:10.1038/s41522-022-00332-w · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationWu, Y., Gao, N., Sun, C., Feng, T., Liu, Q., & Chen, W. (2024) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-024-01784-2 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
de Almeida, R. T. R., do Prado, R. M., Porto, C., dos Santos, G. T., Huws, S., & Pilau, E. J. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36196-4 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, Y., Li, F., Chen, Y., Wu, H., Meng, Q., & Guan, L. L. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00367 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationHuws, S., Edwards, J. E., Lin, W., Rubino, F., Alston, M. J., Swarbreck, D., Caim, S., Stevens, P. R., Pachebat, J. A., Won, M., et al. (2021) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-021-01087-w · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationKlassen, L., Reintjes, G., Tingley, J. P., Jones, D. R., Hehemann, J., Smith, A. D., Schwinghamer, T. D., Arnosti, C., Jin, L., Alexander, T. W., et al. (2021) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00975-x · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationStewart, R. D., Auffret, M. D., Roehe, R., & Watson, M. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/421024 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationDynamic role of single‐celled fungi in ruminal microbial ecology and activities
Elghandour, M. M. M. Y., Khusro, A., Adegbeye, M. J., Tan, Z., Hafsa, S. H. A., Greiner, R., Ugbogu, E. A., Anele, U. Y., & Salem, A. Z. M. (2019) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.14427 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Cortés, A., Rooney, J., Bartley, D. J., Nisbet, A. J., & Cantacessi, C. (2020) · Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy · doi:10.1080/14787210.2020.1782188 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Smith, P. E., Waters, S. M., Expósito, R. G., Smidt, H., Carberry, C. A., & McCabe, M. S. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.606825 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationBadhan, A., Wang, Y., Terry, S. A., Gruninger, R. J., Guan, L. L., & McAllister, T. A. (2025) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2024-26063 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationSeyedin, S. M. V., Zeidi, A., Chamanehpour, E., Nasri, M. H. F., & Vargas‐Bello‐Pérez, E. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142416897 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Methane Emissions and the Use of Desmanthus in Beef Cattle Production in Northern Australia
Suybeng, B., Charmley, E., Gardiner, C., Malau‐Aduli, B. S., & Malau‐Aduli, A. E. O. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9080542 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Luo, S., Wang, Y., Kang, X., Liu, P., & Wang, G. (2022) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105809 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Poultry processing and the application of microbiome mapping
Feye, K. M., Thompson, D. R., Rothrock, M. J., Kogut, M. H., & Ricke, S. C. (2020) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.019 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Meo-Filho, P., Ramirez-Agudelo, J. F., & Kebreab, E. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2410863121 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Li, Y., Lv, M., Wang, J., Tian, Z., Yu, B., Wang, B., Liu, J., & Liu, H. (2020) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms9010083 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Rumen and fecal microbiomes are related to diet and production traits in Bos indicus beef cattle
Conteville, L. C., da Silva, J. V., Andrade, B. G. N., Cardoso, T. F., Bruscadin, J. J., de Oliveira, P. S. N., Mourão, G. B., Coutinho, L. L., Palhares, J. C. P., Berndt, A., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1282851 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Thacharodi, A., Hassan, S., Ahmed, Z. H. T., Singh, P., Maqbool, M., Meenatchi, R., Pugazhendhi, A., & Sharma, A. K. (2024) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2024.119661 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Fu, R., Lin, H., Li, Q., Li, Z., Dai, Y., & Leng, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1554271 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
MAP, Johne’s disease and the microbiome; current knowledge and future considerations
Matthews, C., Cotter, P. D., & Mahony, J. O. (2021) · Animal Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s42523-021-00089-1 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Wang, W., Dong, Y., Guo, W., Zhang, X., Degen, A. A., Bi, S., Ding, L., Chen, X., & Long, R. (2024) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1301258 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Guo, W., Zhou, M., Li, F., Neves, A. L. A., Ma, T., Bi, S., Wang, W., Long, R., & Guan, L. L. (2024) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-024-02035-4 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationMuñoz‐Tamayo, R., Popova, M., Tillier, M., Morgavi, D. P., Morel, J., Fonty, G., & Morel‐Desrosiers, N. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226243 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationSong, B., Wu, T., You, P., Wang, H., Burke, J. L., Kang, K., Yu, W., Wang, M., Li, B., He, Y., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2021.657816 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Hart, E. H., Christofides, S. R., Davies, T. E., Stevens, P. R., Creevey, C. J., Müller, C. T., Rogers, H. J., & Kingston‐Smith, A. H. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08309-7 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Huws, S. A., Creevey, C. J., Oyama, L. B., Mizrahi, I., Denman, S. E., Popova, M., Muñoz-Tamayo, R., Forano, E., Waters, S. M., Hess, M., Tapio, I., Smidt, H., Krizsan, S. J., Yáñez-Ruiz, D. R., Belanche, A., Guan, L., Gruninger, R. J., McAllister, T. A., Newbold, C. J., Roehe, R., Dewhurst, R. J., Snelling, T. J., Watson, M., Suen, G., Hart, E. H., Kingston-Smith, A. H., Scollan, N. D., do Prado, R. M., Pilau, E. J., Mantovani, H. C., Attwood, G. T., Edwards, J. E., McEwan, N. R., Morrisson, S., Mayorga, O. L., Elliott, C., & Morgavi, D. P.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- VetAgro Sup (FR)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
- Scotland's Rural College (GB)
- Roslin Institute (GB)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Aberystwyth University (GB)
- Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR)
- Robert Gordon University (GB)
- Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria – AGROSAVIA (CO)
- Corresponding author
- Huws, Sharon A.
- ORCID
- Huws, Sharon A.
- Creevey, Christopher J.
- Oyama, Linda B.
- Mizrahi, Itzhak
- Denman, Stuart E.
- Popova, Milka
- Hess, Matthias
- Tapio, Ilma
- Smidt, Hauke
- Krizsan, Sophie J.
- Belanche, Alejandro
- Gruninger, Robert J.
- McAllister, Tim A.
- Newbold, C. Jamie
- Roehe, Rainer
- Dewhurst, Richard J.
- Watson, Mick
- Suen, Garret
- Hart, Elizabeth H.
- Scollan, Nigel D.
- Pilau, Eduardo J.
- Attwood, Graeme T.
- Edwards, Joan E.
- McEwan, Neil R.
- Morgavi, Diego P.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-09-25
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 2161-2161
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6167468
- OpenAlex
- W2889449548
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 299
- Citations by year
- 2026: 63 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Open Access Institutional Repository at Robert Gordon University (Robert Gordon University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)) (submittedVersion)
- Open Access Institutional Repository at Robert Gordon University (Robert Gordon University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (67015-23246)
- Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division
- Scottish Government
- European Commission (EU-H2020, 706899, HORIZON2020, H2020)
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (ALW.GAS.5)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Scotland’s Rural College
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture (2015-67015-23246, 67015-23246)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU‐H2020, 640384)
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/D/30002276, BBS/E/W/10964A01B, BBS/OS/GC/000011B, 172629373, BBS/E/W/0012843D, BB/N016742/1, BB/N01720X/1, BB/L026716/1, BB/L026716/2, BBS/E/D/20310000, BBSRC BB/N01720X/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- rumen microbiome, ruminants, animal husbandry, methane mitigation, methanogenic archaea, microbial interactions, dietary intervention, animal breeding, high-throughput phenotyping, omics, food security, environmental impact of livestock
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review