NIR spectroscopic study of the dissolution process in pharmaceutical tablets
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Water penetration into a tablet is strongly governed by porosity.
“Hattori and Otsuka 27 have reiterated that the rate at which water penetrates a tablet significantly depends on the porosity.”
From A Fast and Non-destructive Terahertz Dissolution Assay for Immediate Release Tablets (2021) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Hattori, Y., & Otsuka, M.
- Affiliations
- Musashino University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Hattori, Yusuke
- Venue
- Vibrational Spectroscopy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 275-281
- ISSN
- 0924-2031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060900023
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Vibrational Spectroscopy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
- Keywords
- tablet dissolution, water penetration, pharmaceutical excipients, tablet porosity, water-solid interactions, diffusion-controlled dissolution, two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy, near-infrared spectroscopy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
