Cited by 45Terahertz technology and applicationsAnalytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsDrug Solubulity and Delivery Systems

A Fast and Non-destructive Terahertz Dissolution Assay for Immediate Release Tablets

Open access
Bawuah, Prince, Markl, Daniel, Turner, Alice, Evans, Mike, Portieri, Alessia, Farrell, Daniel, Lucas, Ralph, Anderson, Andrew +2 more·2021·Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Abstract

There is a clear need for a robust process analytical technology tool that can be used for on-line/in-line prediction of dissolution and disintegration characteristics of pharmaceutical tablets during manufacture. Tablet porosity is a reliable and fundamental critical quality attribute which controls key mass transport mechanisms that govern disintegration and dissolution behaviour. A measurement protocol was developed to measure the total porosity of a large number of tablets in transmission without the need for any sample preparation. By using this fast and non-destructive terahertz spectroscopy method it is possible to predict the disintegration and dissolution of drug from a tablet in less than a second per sample without the need of a chemometric model. The validity of the terahertz porosity method was established across a range of immediate release (IR) formulations of ibuprofen and indomethacin tablets of varying geometries as well as with and without debossing. Excellent correlation was observed between the measured terahertz porosity, dissolution characteristics (time to release 50% drug content) and disintegration time for all samples. These promising results and considering the robustness of the terahertz method pave the way for a fully automated at-line/on-line porosity sensor for real time release testing of IR tablets dissolution.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

A terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS) transmission method was developed to measure tablet porosity non-destructively in ≤1 s and use it to predict disintegration and dissolution of immediate-release tablets without a chemometric model. Across ibuprofen and indomethacin IR formulations, terahertz porosity correlated strongly with nominal porosity, disintegration time, 50% dissolution time, and tensile strength.

Key findings

  • THz porosity, fTHz, showed excellent linear correlation with nominal porosity for biconvex, flat-faced, debossed, and non-debossed tablets; averaged fitting parameters were slope ≈ 1, R² ≈ 1, and RMSE ≈ 0.03%.
  • Disintegration time correlated with fTHz using second-order polynomial fitting, with averaged R² ≈ 0.99 and RMSE ≈ 0.2 min.
  • Dissolution time at 50% drug release correlated with fTHz; ibuprofen tablets gave R² ≈ 0.95 and RMSE ≈ 0.7 min, while indomethacin tablets gave R² ≈ 0.90 and RMSE ≈ 1.5 min.
  • Tensile strength also correlated with fTHz, with averaged R² ≈ 0.99 and RMSE ≈ 0.014 MPa; acquisition time could be reduced to 0.12 s, corresponding to up to 30,000 tablets per hour.

Methods

  • Directly compressed IR tablets containing ibuprofen or indomethacin at 1% and 10% w/w, with microcrystalline cellulose, lactose anhydrous, croscarmellose sodium, and magnesium stearate; five batches spanned about 2–24% porosity, with 400 mg biconvex tablets, some debossed, plus flat-faced tablets for zero-porosity refractive index measurements.
  • THz-TDS measurements used a TeraPulse 4000 in transmission with nitrogen purging; effective refractive index was extracted from frequency-domain data, and porosity was calculated using the anisotropic Bruggeman model.
  • Disintegration testing followed USP/EP methods on 6 tablets per batch; dissolution used USP II paddle apparatus in pH 7.2 buffer for ibuprofen and pH 6.2 buffer for indomethacin, 900 mL, 50 rpm, 37°C, with UV detection; hardness was converted to tensile strength.

Limitations

  • The paper states that using porosity as the only parameter to predict release and dissolution is a challenge, making the method suitable for rapidly disintegrating tablets containing highly soluble APIs; future universal methods should consider swelling, liquid ingress, pore shape/structure, and API solubility/dissolution properties.
  • The paper notes scattering in indomethacin dissolution data and experimental inconsistencies, such as a disintegration disk sticking to a tablet and delaying disintegration.
  • Evident from the text: the study covers only two APIs, four formulations, and directly compressed tablets without granulation; disintegration and dissolution testing were performed only on non-debossed biconvex tablets, while debossed tablets were used only for porosity measurements.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.xphs.2020.11.041

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 30 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    THz porosity correlated linearly with nominal porosity for biconvex tablets even though the APIs absorb THz radiation relatively strongly.

    “Despite the use of relatively high terahertz absorbing APIs, Fig. 3 shows excellent linear correlations between the measured terahertz porosity, fTHz, and the nominal porosity, fnominal.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Debossing had a negligible effect on the THz porosity measured from tablets.

    “In other words, the presence of debossing, as typically found on most commercial tablets, has negligible impact on the measured terahertz porosity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Debossing is common on commercial tablets.
  • Findingown data

    Using placebo biconvex tablets with comparable excipients, tablet porosity was measured accurately when the THz acquisition time was cut to roughly 0.12 s.

    “In this study using a given placebo biconvex tablets with a similar excipient composition as the current formulations, we have shown that it is possible to accurately measure the porosity of tablets by reducing the acquisition time to about one eighth of a second (0.12 s).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    For flat-faced tablets, placebo tablets, and non-debossed biconvex tablets, the terahertz porosity values correlated strongly with the nominal porosity values.

    “To further buttress the robustness of the terahertz porosity measurement method, excellent correlations between fTHz and fnominal were obtained for the flat-faced tablets (see Fig. S4 in the supplementary information), the placebo tablets (Fig. S2 in the supplementary information) and the non-debossed biconvex tablets (Table 3 and in Fig. S6 in the supplementary information).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Apart from scattering in the indomethacin tablet data, dissolution time and measured terahertz porosity showed a generally good correlation.

    “Aside from the seemingly 15 scattering in the data of the indomethacin tablets (Fig. 5 (b) & (c)), a generally good correlation 16 can be observed between dissolution time and the measured terahertz porosity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 15
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For every sample, THz porosity correlated strongly with both disintegration time and the time needed to release half the drug.

    “Excellent correlation was observed between the measured terahertz porosity, dissolution characteristics (time to release 50% drug content) and disintegration time for all samples.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At 10 mm path length, the UV maximum was 222 nm for ibuprofen and 265 nm for indomethacin.

    “Ibuprofen was observed to have an absorption maximum at 222 nm and indomethacin was found to exhibit an absorption maximum at 265 nm, based on a path length of 10 mm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For dissolution versus terahertz porosity, second-order polynomial fitting gave averaged R-squared of about 0.95 and RMSE of about 0.7 min for ibuprofen tablets, and R-squared of about 0.90 and RMSE of about 1.5 min for indomethacin tablets.

    “Second order polynomial data fitting was performed and the averaged fitting parameters that were obtained for ibuprofen tablets were R 2 ≈ 0.95 and RMSE ≈ 0.7 min, whereas R 2 ≈ 0.90 and RMSE ≈ 1.5 min were obtained for the indomethacin tablets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The measured zero-porosity refractive indices were 1.839 for F1-Ibup, 1.846 for F1-Indo, 1.810 for F2-Ibup, and 1.824 for F2-Indo.

    “| Formulation | nsolid | | --- | --- | | F1-Ibup | 1.839 | | F1-Indo | 1.846 | | F2-Ibup | 1.810 | | F2-Indo | 1.824 |”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For all batches, the averaged fitting parameters were a slope of about 1, an R-squared of about 1, and an RMSE of about 0.03%.

    “The obtained averaged fitting parameters for all batches 7 are: slope ≈ 1, R 2 ≈ 1 and RMSE ≈ 0.03%.8”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Water penetration into a tablet is strongly governed by porosity.

    “Hattori and Otsuka 27 have reiterated that the rate at which water penetrates a tablet significantly depends on the porosity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Hattori, 2011, NIR spectroscopic study of the dissolution process in pharmaceutical tablets, Vib Spectrosc source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Porosity is a dependable and essential quality attribute for tablets, and it governs the mass transport processes behind disintegration and dissolution.

    “Tablet porosity is a reliable and fundamental critical quality attribute which controls key mass transport mechanisms that govern disintegration and dissolution behaviour.”
    • Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
      “porosity plays a major role in disintegration performance of IR tablets 26 .”
    • Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
      “directly govern mass transport mechanisms in a tablet during its disintegration and subsequent drug release 16,17 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [16] Markl, 2018, Characterisation of pore structures of pharmaceutical tablets: a review, Int J Pharm source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [17] Markl, 2017, Non-destructive determination of disintegration time and dissolution in immediate release tablets by terahertz transmission measurements, Pharm Res source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [26] Bi, 1999, Evaluation of rapidly disintegrating tablets prepared by a direct compression method, Drug Dev Ind Pharm source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The THz porosity method is fast, non-destructive, non-invasive, and needs no sample preparation.

    “The terahertz porosity method has the advantage that it is fast (under a second), non-destructive, non-invasive and requires no sample preparation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31][32][33]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To account for possible post-compaction relaxation, nominal porosity was determined days after compaction and immediately before THz testing.

    “The nominal porosity (fnominal) of the batches, as given by Eq. ( 1), was measured several days after the compaction, but just before the terahertz measurements were conducted, to allow for possible post-compaction mechanical relaxation of the tablets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The literature contains studies linking how a drug dissolves from a tablet to the tablet's overall disintegration.

    “Studies that seek to establish correlation between the dissolution of a drug from a tablet and the overall tablet disintegration have been reported in the literature [19][20][21] .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19][20][21]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Nitrogen purging was maintained in the THz-TDS sample area during measurement to limit water vapour interference.

    “The sample compartment of the THz-TDS was continuously purged with nitrogen gas throughout the measurements to minimize the impact of water vapour on the measured THz signal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The disintegration assay met USP 701 and EP 2.9.1 requirements and used a standard disintegration apparatus.

    “The performed disintegration testing complies with the requirements of the current United States Pharmacopeia (USP) chapter 701 41 , and the European Pharmacopeia (EP) standard 2.9.1 42 , using a standard disintegration tester (DT50, SOTAX AG, Switzerland).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [41]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [42]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    ICH Q6A considers situations in which disintegration testing could substitute for dissolution testing.

    “the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Tripartite Guideline Q6A 18 has extensively discussed cases where disintegration testing may be employed as a substitute for dissolution testing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mercury and helium porosimetry, the usual porosity techniques, take considerable time and damage the sample.

    “This may be due partly to the relatively time-consuming and destructive nature of existing conventional porosity measurement methods like mercury or helium porosimetry 16,29,30 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [16] Markl, 2018, Characterisation of pore structures of pharmaceutical tablets: a review, Int J Pharm source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [29] Riippi, 1998, Dependence between dissolution rate and porosity of compressed erythromycin acistrate tablets, Eur J Pharm Biopharm source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [30] Ridgway, 2017, On the role of API in determining porosity, pore structure and bulk modulus of the skeletal material in pharmaceutical tablets formed with MCC excipient, Int J Pharm source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In the late 1990s, a promising association was reported between tablet porosity and how quickly erythromycin acistrate dissolved.

    “Riippi et al., 29 have initially reported on a promising correlation between porosity and dissolution rate of erythromycin acistrate from tablet samples in the late 1990s.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Riippi, 1998, Dependence between dissolution rate and porosity of compressed erythromycin acistrate tablets, Eur J Pharm Biopharm source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The dissolution method was USP II paddle; ibuprofen was tested in pH 7.2 buffer and indomethacin in pH 6.2 buffer, following pharmacopoeial requirements.

    “The ibuprofen tablets were run in pH 7.2 phosphate buffer as required by the British Pharmacopoeia 43 whereas the indomethacin tablets were run in pH 6.2 phosphate buffer to meet the standard requirements of United State of America Pharmacopoeia 44 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [43]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [44]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Drug dissolution kinetics and porosity are interrelated.

    “Delalonde and Ruiz 28 have shown the interplay between dissolution kinetics of drug and porosity”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Delalonde, 2008, Dissolution of pharmaceutical tablets: the influence of penetration and drainage of interstitial fluids, Chem Eng Process Process Intensif source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    A THz measurement can forecast how quickly a tablet disintegrates and releases drug, taking under a second per sample and needing no chemometric model.

    “By using this fast and non-destructive terahertz spectroscopy method it is possible to predict the disintegration and dissolution of drug from a tablet in less than a second per sample without the need of a chemometric model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: A robust PAT tool is needed for online or in-line prediction of tablet dissolution and disintegration during manufacturing.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    NIR and Raman porosity predictions are surface-sensitive and model-dependent, so they may not represent the tablet's bulk.

    “Yet, these methods typically only probe surface properties and rely on the use of chemometric models.Given the surface measurement, the results may not necessarily represent the bulk tablet property.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Shah, 2007, Process analytical technology: chemometric analysis of Raman and near infra-red spectroscopic data for predicting physical properties of extended release matrix tablets, J Pharm Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Several factors influence disintegration: tablet porosity, surface morphology, particle size, wicking of solvent, swelling, and strain recovery.

    “tablet disintegration is impacted by several factors, starting from the physical properties of the tablets (porosity, surface morphology and particle size), solvent penetration/wicking, swelling and strain recovery [22][23][24][25] .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22][23][24][25]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Other possible contributors to the observed dissolution behaviors of the two APIs include particle size distribution and differences in dissolution medium pH.

    “Other contributing factors to the observed dissolution behaviours of the two APIs may include material attribute like particle size distribution and the different PH values of the dissolution media.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A previous study found that hardness does not always correlate with porosity, especially for granulated samples.

    “Despite our previous study that has revealed that hardness does not always correlate with the porosity (especially for granulated samples) 17 , the current samples have shown excellent correlation between the tensile strength and terahertz-based porosity values (Fig. 6).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] Markl, 2017, Non-destructive determination of disintegration time and dissolution in immediate release tablets by terahertz transmission measurements, Pharm Res source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    High tablet porosity permits rapid liquid penetration and wicking, which exposes the disintegrant to solvent, increases swelling, and leads to tablet breakdown.

    “Generally, high tablet porosities allow fast liquid penetration/wicking rate, which then quickly exposes the disintegrant to the penetrating solvent and thus culminating in an increased swelling rate and the final breakdown of the tablet 22 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Markl, 2017, A review of disintegration mechanisms and measurement techniques, Pharm Res source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The promising correlations of terahertz porosity with dissolution, disintegration, and hardness or tensile strength demonstrate that the terahertz porosity method can be used for real-time release testing of tablet dissolution.

    “Moreover, the observed promising correlations of the terahertz porosity with dissolution, disintegration and hardness/tensile strength demonstrate the ability of using the terahertz porosity method for RTRT of tablet dissolution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
24 of 24
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A robust PAT tool is needed for online or in-line prediction of tablet dissolution and disintegration during manufacturing.

    “There is a clear need for a robust process analytical technology tool that can be used for online/in-line prediction of dissolution and disintegration characteristics of pharmaceutical tablets during manufacture.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Traditional quality-control tests for tablets are resource-intensive, slow, destructive, and cover only a small fraction of product.

    “Traditional quality control methods (dissolution, disintegration, and hardness/tensile strength) are resource intensive, time consuming and destructive and only sample a relatively small proportion of drug product either through inprocess control tests or batch-testing of the end-product.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Debossing is common on commercial tablets.

    “In other words, the presence of debossing, as typically found on most commercial tablets, has negligible impact on the measured terahertz porosity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The disintegration rate of a tablet significantly affects dissolution by exposing drug particles to the dissolution medium.

    “It should be clarified at this point that, although the dissolution behaviour of a given drug substance significantly depends on its solubility properties, the rate at which the tablet disintegrates also plays a significant role by exposing the drug particles to the dissolution medium.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pellets experience material- and pressure-dependent axial relaxation, leading to a change in sample thickness and, in some cases, to porosity.

    “In the case of pellets, however, it is well known that pellets experience material-and pressure-dependent axial relaxation, leading to a change in sample thickness and, in some cases, to porosity [10].”

    From Polymer Pellet Fabrication for Accurate THz-TDS Measurements (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

  • Sample porosity must be minimised because it affects the accuracy of the refractive index obtained from terahertz measurements.

    “Sample porosity must be minimised as it affects the accuracy of the RI obtained from terahertz measurements [1,9,10,14,20,21].”

    From Polymer Pellet Fabrication for Accurate THz-TDS Measurements (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Closing review citation is numbered 52, but listed as 50

    Minor

    The conclusion cites Lu et al. as reference 52, whereas the provided reference list ends with the Lu et al. review at number 50.

  • Tensile-strength equation cites references other than Pitt's papers

    Minor

    The equation is attributed to Pitt et al. with citations 45 and 46, but the Pitt papers are listed as references 43 and 44. References 45 and 46 name different authors and topics.

  • Figure 2 panel (c) is assigned two different roles

    Minor

    The text identifies panels (b) and (d) as containing the selected refractive indices, while the caption says panels (b) and (c) show the resulting correlations. The same caption identifies (c) as a panel containing a shaded frequency range, indicating that (d), not (c), is the second correlation panel.

  • Disintegration-standard citations do not match their references

    Minor

    The text assigns reference 41 to the USP standard and 42 to the EP standard. The reference list instead identifies 41 as European Pharmacopoeia and 42 as British Pharmacopoeia.

  • Dissolution-method pharmacopoeia citations point to tensile-strength papers

    Minor

    The dissolution methods cite references 43 and 44 for pharmacopoeia requirements, but both numbered references are papers about tablet tensile strength.

5 of 5

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2004, Industry G for. Guidance for industry PAT — a framework for innovative pharmaceutical development, manufacuring, and quality assurance, FDA Off Doc, September, 16
  2. 2012, Guideline on real time release testing EMA/CHMP/QWP/811210/2009-Rev1, Comm Med Prod Hum Use, 44, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bawuah, P., Markl, D., Turner, A., Evans, M., Portieri, A., Farrell, D., Lucas, R., Anderson, A., Goodwin, D. J., & Zeitler, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GB)
  • TeraView (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Zeitler, J. Axel
Venue
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
110
Issue
5
Pages
2083-2092
ISSN
0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3110682041
Cited by
45
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo
Funders
Innovate UK
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Terahertz technology and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
Keywords
terahertz spectroscopy, tablet porosity, immediate release tablets, dissolution testing, disintegration time, process analytical technology, non-destructive measurement, ibuprofen tablets, real-time release testing, critical quality attributes
MeSH terms
Drug Compounding, Solubility, Tablets, Porosity, Terahertz Spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review