Cited by 377Origins and Evolution of LifeEvolution and Genetic DynamicsBacteriophages and microbial interactions

The origin of viruses and their possible roles in major evolutionary transitions

Forterre, Patrick·2006·Virus Research

Abstract

Viruses infecting cells from the three domains of life, Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya, share homologous features, suggesting that viruses originated very early in the evolution of life. The three current hypotheses for virus origin, e.g. the virus first, the escape and the reduction hypotheses are revisited in this new framework. Theoretical considerations suggest that RNA viruses may have originated in the nucleoprotein world by escape or reduction from RNA-cells, whereas DNA viruses (at least some of them) might have evolved directly from RNA viruses. The antiquity of viruses can explain why most viral proteins have no cellular homologues or only distantly related ones. Viral proteins have replaced the ancestral bacterial RNA/DNA polymerases and primase during mitochondrial evolution. It has been suggested that replacement of cellular proteins by viral ones also occurred in early evolution of the DNA replication apparatus and/or that some DNA replication proteins originated directly in the virosphere and were later on transferred to cellular organisms. According to these new hypotheses, viruses played a critical role in major evolutionary transitions, such as the invention of DNA and DNA replication mechanisms, the formation of the three domains of life, or else, the origin of the eukaryotic nucleus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.01.010

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In silico coevolution models, in vitro evolution and genomic analyses have shown that parasites actively promote diversity and evolvability.

    “In silico coevolution models [333,334], in vitro evolution [335,336] and genomic analyses [337,338] have shown that parasites actively promote diversity and evolvability, as illustrated by the phylogenetic trees in figure 9a,b.”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [337]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Forterre, P.
Affiliations
Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
Forterre, Patrick
Venue
Virus Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
117
Issue
1
Pages
5-16
ISSN
0168-1702 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010736443
Cited by
377
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 28
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Virus Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
Keywords
viral origin, viral evolution, evolutionary transitions, RNA viruses, DNA viruses, viral proteins, mitochondrial evolution, DNA replication, three domains of life, horizontal gene transfer
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Archaea, Bacteria, DNA, Eukaryotic Cells, Biological Evolution, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, RNA, Viruses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review