The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670 · cited 1×
“There is an extensive literature on spatial cueing (e.g. Chastain, Cheal, & Lyon, 1996; Cheal, Lyon, & Gottlob, 1993; Posner, 1980; Posner, Nissen, & Ogden, 1978) (usefully reviewed in Chapter 4 of Pashler, 1997).”
Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.15.3.419 · Cited by 2,147
Self-citationPriming of pop-out: I. Role of features
Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03209251 · Cited by 1,107
Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention
Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03213897 · Cited by 870 · cited 2×
“A reader of Lavie's work (Lavie, 1995; Lavie & Tsal, 1994) might argue that the picture cues were ignored because the word cue was so difficult that it forced a tight focus of attention on the words and excluded the pictures.”
Background
Cited by
Five factors that guide attention in visual search
Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0058 · Cited by 875
Self-citationAn Integrated Model of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Attention for Optimizing Detection Speed
Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.54 · Cited by 369
Search Goal Tunes Visual Features Optimally
Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.018 · Cited by 331
Feature-based attention: it is all bottom-up priming
Theeuwes, J. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0055 · Cited by 168
Content-specific expectations enhance stimulus detectability by increasing perceptual sensitivity
Stein, T., & Peelen, M. V. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000109 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1411-1426
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121995821
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.024
- The paper
- Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
