Cited by 49Motor Control and AdaptationVestibular and auditory disordersVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Evidence for wide range of time scales in oculomotor plant dynamics: Implications for models of eye-movement control

Open access
Sklavos, Sokratis, Porrill, John, Kaneko, Chris R.S., Dean, Paul·2005·Vision Research

Abstract

Oculomotor-plant dynamics are not well characterised, despite their importance for modelling eye-movement control. We analysed the time course of the globe's return after horizontal displacements in three rhesus monkeys lightly anaesthetised with ketamine. The eye-position traces were well fitted by a sum of four exponentials (time constants 0.012, 0.099, 0.46, 7.8 s). The two long time-constant terms accounted for 25% of plant compliance, and led to a model that accounted for hitherto unexplained features of ocular motoneuron firing such as (i) hysteresis, and (ii) the inability of a 2 time-constant model to fit data for both fast and slow eye-movements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This cyclic structure may be required for control of the eye plant, which can be approximated as a highly damped mass-spring system whose impulse-response function exhibits overdamped oscillations, and may suggest the importance of a weak, but non-negligible, mass term in the plant.

    “This may be required for control of the eye plant, which can be approximated as a highly damped mass-spring system whose impulse-response function exhibits overdamped oscillations59 and may suggest the importance of a weak, but non-negligible, mass term in the plant that is commonly ignored in simplified descriptions55,60.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sklavos, S., Porrill, J., Kaneko, C. R. S., & Dean, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Patras (GR)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Dean, Paul
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
45
Issue
12
Pages
1525-1542
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029154346
Cited by
49
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vision Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (EY06558, RR00166)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
oculomotor control, time constant, exponential decay, hysteresis, rhesus monkeys, eye movement models
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Cerebellum, Eye Movements, Facial Muscles, Macaca mulatta, Motor Neurons, Time Factors, Models, Animal, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review