Cited by 43Visual perception and processing mechanismsMultisensory perception and integrationMotor Control and Adaptation

Bloch’s law and the dynamics of feature fusion

Open access
Scharnowski, Frank, Hermens, Frouke, Herzog, Michael H.·2007·Vision Research

Abstract

How the visual brain integrates temporally dispersed information is an open question. Often, it is assumed that the visual system simply sums light over a certain period of time (e.g. Bloch's law). However, in feature fusion, information presented later dominates, suggesting complex temporal dynamics that cannot be described by simple energy summation. For example, if two verniers are presented in rapid succession at the same location, they are not perceived individually but they fuse to one single vernier. The perceived offset of the fused vernier is a combination of the offsets of the two presented verniers, with the later one dominating. Here, we show that indeed, Bloch's law does not hold across verniers in a sequence. However, changes in the luminance of a single vernier can be compensated for by changes in its duration in accordance with Bloch's law. We present a simple model to demonstrate that these findings can be explained by decaying neural activation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.004

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When LED irradiance was reduced, there was an intensity-dependent decrease in the magnitude of the dLight1 peak and an increase in the response latency.

    “When LED irradiance was reduced, we observed an intensity-dependent decrease in the magnitude of the dLight1 peak and an increase in the response latency (Figure 2E–F), consistent with Bloch’s law of temporal summation in mammalian photoreceptors (Scharnowski et al., 2007; Donner, 2021).”

    From Ventral striatum dopamine release encodes unique properties of visual stimuli in mice (2023) · cites this paper as Scharnowski et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scharnowski, F., Hermens, F., & Herzog, M. H.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Scharnowski, Frank
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
47
Issue
18
Pages
2444-2452
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977788737
Cited by
43
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vision Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
Bloch's law, feature fusion, temporal integration
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Form Perception, Humans, Lighting, Male, Models, Neurological, Photic Stimulation, Psychophysics, Time Factors, Time Perception, Visual Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review