Cited by 172Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Simulating prosthetic vision: I. Visual models of phosphenes

Open access
Chen, Spencer C., Suaning, Gregg J., Morley, John W., Lovell, Nigel H.·2009·Vision Research

Abstract

With increasing research advances and clinical trials of visual prostheses, there is significant demand to better understand the perceptual and psychophysical aspects of prosthetic vision. In prosthetic vision a visual scene is composed of relatively large, isolated, spots of light so-called "phosphenes", very much like a magnified pictorial print. The utility of prosthetic vision has been studied by investigators in the form of virtual-reality visual models (simulations) of prosthetic vision administered to normally sighted subjects. In this review, the simulations from these investigations are examined with respect to how they visually render the phosphenes and the virtual-reality apparatus involved. A comparison is made between these simulations and the actual descriptions of phosphenes reported from human trials of visual prosthesis devices. For the results from these simulation studies to be relevant to the experience of visual prosthesis recipients, it is important that, the simulated phosphenes must be consistent with the descriptions from human trials. A standardized simulation and reporting framework is proposed so that future simulations may be configured to be more realistic to the experience of implant recipients, and the simulation parameters from different investigators may be more readily extracted, and study results more fittingly compared.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many computational models of prosthetic vision assume a linear relationship between stimulus parameters (e.g. amplitude) and phosphene appearance (e.g. brightness).

    “Many computational models of prosthetic vision (Chen et al 2009, Perez-Yus et al 2017, Sanchez-Garcia et al 2019, Granley and Beyeler 2021) assume a linear relationship between stimulus parameters (e.g. amplitude) and phosphene appearance (e.g. brightness).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 102 · Cited by 172

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Brindley, G. S., & Rushton, D. N. (1974). Implanted stimulators of the visual cortex as visual prosthetic devices. Transactions of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Octaryngology, 78, 741-745.
  2. Dowling, J., Boles, W., Maeder, A. (2005). Mobility assessment using simulated artificial human vision. In Computer vision and pattern recognition, 2005 IEEE computer society conference on.
  3. Hallum, L. E., Taubman, D., Suaning, G. J., Morley, J., Lovell, N. H. (2003). A filtering approach to artificial vision: a phosphene visual tracking task. In IFMBE proceedings, world congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering, August 24-29, Sydney.
  4. Sterling, T. D., & Weinkam, J. J. (1971). Preprocessing of sensed information for analysis and display. In T. D. Sterling, J. E. A. Bering, S. V. Pollack, & J. H. G. Vaughan (Eds.), Visual prosthesis: The interdisciplinary dialogue (pp. 145-156). New York and London: Academic Press.
  5. Wanet-defalgue, M. C., delbeke, J., Michaux, G., Vanlierde, A., Parrini, S., Veraart, C. (2000). A visual prosthesis based on electrical stimulation of the optic nerve. In T. Sinkjaer, D. Popovic, J. Struijik (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th annual conference of the interational functional electrical stimulation society. Aalborg, Denmark, SMI.

Authors
Chen, S. C., Suaning, G. J., Morley, J. W., & Lovell, N. H.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Chen, Spencer C.
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
49
Issue
12
Pages
1493-1506
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034121241
Cited by
172
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vision Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
visual prosthesis, phosphenes, prosthetic vision, virtual reality simulation, visual models, visual perception, psychophysics, retinal prosthesis
MeSH terms
Blindness, Electric Stimulation, Humans, Models, Neurological, Models, Psychological, Phosphenes, Psychophysics, User-Computer Interface, Visual Perception, Prostheses and Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review