Axonal stimulation affects the linear summation of single-point perception in three Argus II users
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Objective. Retinal implants use electrical stimulation to elicit perceived flashes of light (‘phosphenes’). Single-electrode phosphene shape has been shown to vary systematically with stimulus parameters and the retinal location of the stimulating electrode, due to incidental activation of passing nerve fiber bundles. However, this knowledge has yet to be extended to paired-electrode stimulation. Approach. We retrospectively analyzed 3548 phosphene drawings made by three blind participants implanted with an Argus II Retinal Prosthesis. Phosphene shape (characterized by area, perimeter, major and minor axis length) and number of perceived phosphenes were averaged across trials and correlated with the corresponding single-electrode parameters. In addition, the number of phosphenes was correlated with stimulus amplitude and neuroanatomical parameters: electrode-retina and electrode-fovea distance as well as the electrode-electrode distance to (‘between-axon’) and along axon bundles (‘along-axon’). Statistical analyses were conducted using linear regression and partial correlation analysis. Main results. Simple regression revealed that each paired-electrode shape descriptor could be predicted by the sum of the two corresponding single-electrode shape descriptors ( p < .001). Multiple regression revealed that paired-electrode phosphene shape was primarily predicted by stimulus amplitude and electrode-fovea distance ( p < .05). Interestingly, the number of elicited phosphenes tended to increase with between-axon distance ( p < .05), but not with along-axon distance, in two out of three participants. Significance. The shape of phosphenes elicited by paired-electrode stimulation was well predicted by the shape of their corresponding single-electrode phosphenes, suggesting that two-point perception can be expressed as the linear summation of single-point perception. The impact of the between-axon distance on the perceived number of phosphenes provides further evidence in support of the axon map model for epiretinal stimulation. These findings contribute to the growing literature on phosphene perception and have important implications for the design of future retinal prostheses.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In three Argus II users, paired-electrode phosphene shape was well predicted by the linear sum of the corresponding single-electrode phosphene shapes, and the number of perceived phosphenes increased with between-axon distance but not along-axon distance. These results support independent stimulation channels and the axon map model for epiretinal stimulation.
Key findings
- Paired-electrode shape descriptors were predicted by the sum of the two corresponding single-electrode descriptors (all p < .001); across all participants, standardized β values were .653 for area, .619 for perimeter, .592 for major axis length, and .692 for minor axis length, indicating paired phosphenes were larger than the average of their single-electrode counterparts but smaller than their sum.
- The number of perceived phosphenes increased with between-axon distance (p < .05; all-participant β = .233, r = .327) but not with along-axon distance (p > .05); models using between-axon distance outperformed those using along-axon distance in two of three participants and in the all-participant analysis.
- Single-electrode stimulation produced one phosphene on 86.8% of trials, two on 13.0%, and three or more on the remainder; paired-electrode stimulation produced one phosphene on 53.1% of trials, two on 43.4%, and three or more on the remainder.
- Single-electrode shape was modulated by stimulus amplitude in two of three participants (area and minor axis length, p < .001), by frequency in Participant 3 (perimeter, major and minor axis lengths, p < .001), and by electrode-fovea distance in all three participants (p < .05 or smaller).
Methods
- Retrospective analysis of three blind participants with retinitis pigmentosa implanted with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System; direct stimulation was used for single- or paired-electrode trials, with paired electrodes stimulated simultaneously.
- Methods reports 3587 phosphene drawings collected, 13 removed, leaving 3574 drawings (2717 single-electrode, 857 paired-electrode); after averaging across trials, 379 data points remained, and after outlier removal 353 data points (252 single-electrode, 101 paired-electrode) were analyzed. The abstract states 3548 drawings.
- Shape was quantified using area, perimeter, major axis length, and minor axis length; analyses used multiple linear regression, partial correlation, and linear mixed-effects models with participant as a random effect, with Bonferroni correction. Neuroanatomical predictors included electrode-fovea distance, electrode-retina distance, and between-axon and along-axon distances estimated with pulse2percept and an axon map.
Limitations
- Stated: the linear analyses cannot identify nonlinear predictors of phosphene shape; analyses are limited to single- and paired-electrode stimulation in three participants; future work should test whether linear summation extends to more than two electrodes.
- Evident from the text: all paired-electrode drawings were collected at 20 Hz, so stimulus frequency could not be included in paired-electrode analyses; some participant-specific analyses had small sample sizes (e.g., Participant 2 had N = 9 for the number-of-phosphenes analysis).
- Evident from the text: the study is retrospective, relies on participants’ subjective drawings, and experiments were performed by local field clinical engineers rather than the authors.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 55 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Increasing retinal eccentricity (EFD) led to slightly larger and more elongated phosphenes, by means of the overly increased perimeter (β = .107, r = .469; p < .001) and major axis length (β = .128, r = .479; p < .001).
“Increasing retinal eccentricity (EFD) had a similar effect, leading to slightly larger and more elongated phosphenes, by means of the overly increased perimeter (β = .107, r = .469; p < .001) and major axis length (β = .128, r = .479; p < .001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Across all participants, paired-electrode shape descriptors tended to sum linearly.
“Across all participants, shape descriptors tended to sum linearly, with the β values suggesting that phosphenes elicited by paired-electrode stimulation appeared larger than the average of their single-electrode counterparts, but smaller than their sum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Findingown data
Participant 1 had significantly larger electrode-retina distance values than the other two participants.
“In terms of electrode-retina distance, participant 1 had significantly larger values than the other two participants (, p < .001 and , p < .001) whose implant was closely attached to the retina.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Simple regression revealed that each paired-electrode shape descriptor could be predicted by the sum of the two corresponding single-electrode shape descriptors (p < .001).
“Simple regression revealed that each paired-electrode shape descriptor could be predicted by the sum of the two corresponding single-electrode shape descriptors (p < .001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Electrode-fovea distance affected paired-electrode phosphene shape in two out of three participants (p < .001).
“Similar to the single-point results (table 4), electrode-fovea distance affected phosphene shape in two out of three participants (p < .001), generally increasing the perimeter and major axis length of more eccentric phosphenes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Findingown data
For participant 3, phosphenes that appeared as lines and arcs near threshold turned into blobs and wedges as amplitude was increased.
“The effect of amplitude on phosphene shape was most apparent for participant 3, where phosphenes that appeared as lines and arcs near threshold turned into blobs and wedges as amplitude was increased.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Pulse frequency seemed to affect phosphene shape differently than amplitude.
“First reported by Nanduri et al (2012), pulse frequency seemed to affect phosphene shape differently than amplitude (figure 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nanduri et al 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
There was no statistical difference between the averaged electrode-fovea distance across different participants.
“There was no statistical difference between the averaged electrode-fovea distance across different participants (for participants 1 and 2: , p > .05; for participants 2 and 3: , p > .05; for participants 1 and 3: , p > .05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
When paired-electrode stimulation produced two distinct phosphenes, their shape resembled the linear summation of the phosphenes reported during single-electrode stimulation.
“When paired-electrode stimulation produced two distinct phosphenes (figure 7, left), their shape resembled the linear summation of the phosphenes reported during single-electrode stimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Findingown data
Three or more phosphenes were generally encountered when single-electrode stimulation itself produced more than one phosphene.
“Three or more phosphenes were generally encountered when single-electrode stimulation itself produced more than one phosphene.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Amplitude had a less definitive effect on paired-electrode phosphene shape, only increasing the minor axis length (p < .05) for Participant 1.
“However, in contrast to the single-point results, amplitude (i.e. the average amplitude across the two stimulated electrodes) had a less definitive effect on phosphene shape, only increasing the minor axis length (p < .05) for Participant 1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Findingown data
Amplitude did not significantly modulate phosphenes drawn by participant 2.
“However, amplitude did not significantly modulate phosphenes drawn by participant 2 (also visually evident in figure 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Multiple regression revealed that paired-electrode phosphene shape was primarily predicted by stimulus amplitude and electrode-fovea distance (p < .05).
“Multiple regression revealed that paired-electrode phosphene shape was primarily predicted by stimulus amplitude and electrode-fovea distance (p < .05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Increased stimulus frequencies tended to elicit slightly larger and more extended/less compact phosphenes, by means of the overly increased perimeter (β = .156, r = .617) and major/minor axis lengths (β > .12, r > .4; p < .001).
“Perhaps driven by Participant 3’s data, increased stimulus frequencies tended to elicit slightly larger and more extended/less compact phosphenes, by means of the overly increased perimeter (β = .156, r = .617) and major/minor axis lengths (β > .12, r > .4; p < .001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Electrode-fovea distance generally increased the perimeter and major axis length of more eccentric phosphenes.
“Similar to the single-point results (table 4), electrode-fovea distance affected phosphene shape in two out of three participants (p < .001), generally increasing the perimeter and major axis length of more eccentric phosphenes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Findingown data
Each paired-electrode shape descriptor could be predicted by the sum of the two corresponding single-electrode shape descriptors (p < .001).
“In short, we found that each paired-electrode shape descriptor could be predicted by the sum of the two corresponding single-electrode shape descriptors (table 6; p < .001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Findingown data
Electrode-fovea distance significantly modulated shape in all three participants.
“Interestingly, we found that electrode-fovea distance (labeled ‘EFD’ in table 4) significantly modulated shape in all three participants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When paired-electrode stimulation produced a single phosphene, the phosphenes reported during single-electrode stimulation appeared to merge into a unified shape.
“When paired-electrode stimulation produced a single phosphene (figure 7, right), the phosphenes reported during single-electrode stimulation appeared to merge into a unified shape.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Findingown data
For Participants 2 and 3, more eccentric phosphenes tended to be larger overall (affecting all shape descriptors with p < .05 or smaller).
“For Participants 2 and 3, more eccentric phosphenes tended to be larger overall (affecting all shape descriptors with p < .05 or smaller).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was a significant correlation between the number of perceived phosphenes and the between-axon distance (p < .05).
“Consistent with the axon map model (Beyeler et al 2019b), we found a significant correlation between the number of perceived phosphenes and the between-axon distance (p < .05, table 7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beyeler et al 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Findingown data
Increased stimulus frequencies tended to elicit slightly larger and more extended/less compact phosphenes, by means of increased perimeter and major axis length.
“Perhaps driven by participant 3’s data, increased stimulus frequencies tended to elicit slightly larger and more extended/less compact phosphenes, by means of overly increased perimeter and major axis length.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Findingown data
Increased electrode-fovea distance (retinal eccentricity) led to slightly larger and more elongated phosphenes.
“In addition, we found that increased electrode-fovea distance (i.e. retinal eccentricity) led to slightly larger and more elongated phosphenes (table 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Findingown data
Along-axon distance was not significantly correlated with the number of perceived phosphenes (p > .05).
“Along-axon distance, on the other hand, was not significantly correlated with the number of perceived phosphenes (p > .05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Findingown data
Stimulus frequency affected phosphene size.
“However, in contrast to Nanduri et al (2012), we found that stimulus frequency also affected phosphene size (table 4 and figure 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nanduri et al (2012) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Findingown data
The number of perceived phosphenes did not increase with the along-axon distance of two stimulating electrodes.
“We also found that the number of perceived phosphenes increased with the between-axon distance of two stimulating electrodes, but not the along-axon distance, thus providing further evidence in support of the axon map model for epiretinal stimulation (Rizzo et al 2003, Nanduri 2011, Beyeler et al 2019b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Findingown data
Phosphenes tended to appear larger and rounder as stimulus amplitude increased.
“We found that phosphenes tended to appear larger and rounder as stimulus amplitude increased (table 4), which is consistent with previous considerations about the current spread in the retina (de Balthasar et al 2008, Granley and Beyeler 2021, Yücel et al 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites de Balthasar et al 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Granley and Beyeler 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yücel et al 2022 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Findingown data
The number of perceived phosphenes increased with the between-axon distance of two stimulating electrodes.
“We also found that the number of perceived phosphenes increased with the between-axon distance of two stimulating electrodes, but not the along-axon distance, thus providing further evidence in support of the axon map model for epiretinal stimulation (Rizzo et al 2003, Nanduri 2011, Beyeler et al 2019b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Interpretationown data
The impact of the between-axon distance on the perceived number of phosphenes provides further evidence in support of the axon map model for epiretinal stimulation.
“The impact of the between-axon distance on the perceived number of phosphenes provides further evidence in support of the axon map model for epiretinal stimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Paired-electrode epiretinal stimulation is more likely to elicit two distinct phosphenes as the distance between their underlying axon bundles increases.
“This result provides the first computational evidence that paired-electrode epiretinal stimulation is more likely to elicit two distinct phosphenes as the distance between their underlying axon bundles increases (as opposed to retinal distance alone), and provides further evidence in support of the axon map model for epiretinal stimulation (Rizzo et al 2003, Nanduri 2011, Beyeler et al 2019b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Interpretationown data
These results provide further evidence in support of the axon map model for epiretinal stimulation.
“We also found that the number of perceived phosphenes increased with the between-axon distance of two stimulating electrodes, but not the along-axon distance, thus providing further evidence in support of the axon map model for epiretinal stimulation (Rizzo et al 2003, Nanduri 2011, Beyeler et al 2019b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Rizzo et al 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nanduri 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Beyeler et al 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Study design and conductown data
The variance inflation factor of all predictors in the phosphene number analysis was smaller than 3.1, suggesting minimal multicollinearity.
“The variance inflation factor of all predictors was smaller than 3.1, suggesting minimal multicollinearity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The linear summation of single-point perception supports the notion of independent stimulation channels.
“Our results suggest that two-point perception can be predicted by the linear summation of single-point perception, supporting the notion of independent stimulation channels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Interpretationcitation
The increased size of more eccentric phosphenes may be a consequence of ganglion cell receptive fields increasing with eccentricity.
“While more eccentric phosphenes may be elongated along the trajectory of the underlying nerve fiber bundles (Beyeler et al 2019b), the increased size may be a consequence of ganglion cell receptive fields increasing with eccentricity (Curcio and Allen 1990).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Curcio and Allen 1990
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Interpretationown data
This result provides further evidence in support of the axon map model for epiretinal stimulation.
“This result provides the first computational evidence that paired-electrode epiretinal stimulation is more likely to elicit two distinct phosphenes as the distance between their underlying axon bundles increases (as opposed to retinal distance alone), and provides further evidence in support of the axon map model for epiretinal stimulation (Rizzo et al 2003, Nanduri 2011, Beyeler et al 2019b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Rizzo et al 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nanduri 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Beyeler et al 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Interpretationreasoning
The largest number of phosphenes should be produced by an implant whose placement maximizes the sum of between-axon distances between all pairs of electrodes in the array.
“As the probability of seeing two phosphenes increases with between-axon distance, the largest number of phosphenes should be produced by an implant whose placement maximizes the sum of between-axon distances between all pairs of electrodes in the array.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Premisecitation
Phosphenes tend to appear elongated in the direction of the nerve fiber bundle that underlies the stimulating electrode.
“as phosphenes tend to appear elongated in the direction of the nerve fiber bundle that underlies the stimulating electrode (Beyeler et al 2019b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beyeler et al 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Two-point perception can be predicted by the linear summation of single-point perception.
“Our results suggest that two-point perception can be predicted by the linear summation of single-point perception, supporting the notion of independent stimulation channels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
- Study design and conductown data
The variance inflation factor of all predictors in the paired-electrode shape analysis was smaller than 3, suggesting minimal multicollinearity.
“The variance inflation factor of all predictors was smaller than 3, suggesting minimal multicollinearity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 21
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 36
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe number of elicited phosphenes tended to increase with between-axon distance (p < .05), but not with along-axon distance, in two out of three participants.
“Interestingly, the number of elicited phosphenes tended to increase with between-axon distance (p < .05), but not with along-axon distance, in two out of three participants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStimulus frequency had no significant effect on phosphene shape in participants 1 and 2, but strongly (β > .3, r > .6) and significantly (p < .001) modulated phosphene perimeter, major axis length, and minor axis length in Participant 3.
“Stimulus frequency had no significant effect on phosphene shape in participants 1 and 2, but strongly (β > .3, r > .6) and significantly (p < .001) modulated phosphene perimeter, major axis length, and minor axis length in Participant 3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn a linear mixed-effects model across all participants, larger stimulus amplitudes tended to elicit larger (p < .001) and 'blobbier' phosphenes (by means of increased minor axis length; p < .001).
“This analysis revealed that larger stimulus amplitudes tended to elicit larger (p < .001) and ‘blobbier’ phosphenes (by means of increased minor axis length; p < .001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSingle-electrode stimulation reliably elicited phosphenes in all three participants, who reported seeing a single phosphene on 86.8% of trials, two phosphenes on 13.0% of trials, and three or more phosphenes on the remaining trials.
“Single-electrode stimulation reliably elicited phosphenes in all three participants, who reported seeing a single phosphene on 86.8% of trials, two phosphenes on 13.0% of trials, and three or more phosphenes on the remaining trials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen two electrodes were stimulated simultaneously, participants reported seeing a single phosphene on 53.1% of trials, two phosphenes on 43.4% of trials, and three or more phosphenes on the remaining trials.
“When two electrodes were stimulated simultaneously, participants reported seeing a single phosphene on 53.1% of trials, two phosphenes on 43.4% of trials, and three or more phosphenes on the remaining trials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPhosphenes located close to the center of vision did not noticeably change in shape with frequency, while more eccentric phosphenes changed shape (e.g., blobs at 6 Hz to rectangles at 60 Hz for Participant 1; short streaks at 6 Hz to orders-of-magnitude longer arcs at 60 Hz for participant 3).
“Whereas phosphenes that were located close to the center of vision (denoted by in figure 6) did not noticeably change in shape, more eccentric phosphenes turned from blobs at 6 Hz to rectangles at 60 Hz (Participant 1), or from short streaks at 6 Hz to orders-of-magnitude longer arcs at 60 Hz (participant 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationPhosphene shape greatly varied across participants and electrodes, but was relatively consistent across trials of a single electrode.
“Consistent with the literature on single-electrode phosphene drawings (Nanduri et al 2008, Luo et al 2016, Beyeler et al 2019b), phosphene shape greatly varied across participants and electrodes, but was relatively consistent across trials of a single electrode.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Nanduri et al 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Luo et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Beyeler et al 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataStimulus amplitude strongly affected phosphene area in two out of three participants (p < .001) and minor axis length (p < .001), suggesting that phosphenes tended to get larger with increasing amplitude.
“Consistent with Nanduri et al (2012), we found that stimulus amplitude strongly affected phosphene area in two out of three participants (p < .001) and minor axis length (p < .001), suggesting that phosphenes tended to get larger with increasing amplitude.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nanduri et al 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor participant 1, more eccentric phosphenes tended to be more elongated (p < .001) but not necessarily larger.
“For participant 1, more eccentric phosphenes tended to be more elongated (p < .001) but not necessarily larger.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataElectrode-retina distances were non-zero only in participant 1, where larger ERDs led to smaller phosphenes (p < .05).
“Electrode-retina distances (labeled ‘ERD’ in table 4) were non-zero only in participant 1, where larger ERDs led to smaller phosphenes (p < .05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipant 1 mostly drew blobs and wedges, which grew larger as the stimulus amplitude was increased.
“Whereas participant 1 mostly drew blobs and wedges, which grew larger as the stimulus amplitude was increased, participant 2 reported seeing exclusively lines and arcs, which got longer with increasing amplitude.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipant 2 reported seeing exclusively lines and arcs, which got longer with increasing amplitude.
“Whereas participant 1 mostly drew blobs and wedges, which grew larger as the stimulus amplitude was increased, participant 2 reported seeing exclusively lines and arcs, which got longer with increasing amplitude.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataModels relying on between-axon distance (Model B) significantly outperformed models relying on along-axon distance (Model A) in two out of three participants, as well as in the all-participant analysis.
“As is evident in table 8, we found strong evidence that models relying on between-axon distance (Model B) significantly outperformed models relying on along-axon distance (Model A) in two out of three participants, as well as in the all-participant analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA simple computational model can predict phosphene shape across a wide range of stimulus parameters.
“In addition, phosphene appearance varies systematically with stimulus amplitude and frequency (Horsager et al 2009, Nanduri et al 2012, Sinclair et al 2016) to the extent that a simple computational model can predict phosphene shape across a wide range of stimulus parameters (Granley and Beyeler 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Granley and Beyeler 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationElectric crosstalk between electrodes is important in determining the response to simultaneous stimulation of multiple electrodes.
“For instance, Wilke et al (2011b) highlighted the importance of electric crosstalk between electrodes in determining the response to simultaneous stimulation of multiple electrodes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilke et al 2011b
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationElicited percepts are affected by other stimulating electrodes even after temporally staggering pulses to remove electric field interactions.
“Horsager et al (2011) found that elicited percepts were affected by other stimulating electrodes (even after temporally staggering pulses to remove electric field interactions) and demonstrated a linear combination of threshold currents for simultaneous stimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Horsager et al 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSingle-electrode phosphenes elicited by stimulating a single Argus II electrode have a distinctive shape that is relatively consistent over time.
“A series of papers demonstrated that phosphenes elicited by stimulating a single Argus II electrode have a distinctive shape that is relatively consistent over time (Nanduri et al 2008, Luo et al 2016, Beyeler et al 2019b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Nanduri et al 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Luo et al 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Beyeler et al 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenData from sessions where the false alarm rate exceeded 20% were deemed unreliable and excluded from the analysis.
“Data from sessions where the false alarm rate exceeded 20% were deemed unreliable and excluded from the analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEarly research suggested that repeated paired stimulation resulted in reproducible phosphenes, with participants perceiving 'similar' phosphenes on 66% of trials.
“Early research suggested that repeated paired stimulation resulted in reproducible phosphenes as participants perceived ‘similar’ phosphenes on 66% of trials (Rizzo et al 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rizzo et al 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBipolar electrode configurations produced percepts similar in appearance to the summation of phosphenes elicited from the two individual electrodes using a monopolar configuration.
“Using a suprachoroidal prosthesis, Sinclair et al (2016) found that bipolar electrode configurations produced percepts that were similar in appearance to the summation of the phosphenes that were elicited from the two individual electrodes using a monopolar configuration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sinclair et al 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationA control task was conducted where participants felt six different tactile shapes and drew them on a touchscreen to determine each participant's drawing error and bias.
“Since the validity and reliability of the experiment relied on the ability of our participants to accurately draw the perceived phosphenes, a control task was conducted where participants were asked to feel six different tactile shapes made of felt with a cardboard background, and then draw them on a touchscreen (Beyeler et al 2019b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beyeler et al 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe shape of phosphenes elicited by paired-electrode stimulation was well predicted by the shape of their corresponding single-electrode phosphenes, suggesting that two-point perception can be expressed as the linear summation of single-point perception.
“The shape of phosphenes elicited by paired-electrode stimulation was well predicted by the shape of their corresponding single-electrode phosphenes, suggesting that two-point perception can be expressed as the linear summation of single-point perception.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRecent computational models of prosthetic vision assume linear summation of phosphenes.
“Moreover, recent computational models of prosthetic vision assume linear summation of phosphenes (Spencer et al 2019, de Ruyter van Steveninck et al 2022), but this has yet to be demonstrated empirically.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll paired-electrode drawings were collected at 20 Hz, so stimulus frequency could not be included in the analysis.
“Unfortunately, all paired-electrode drawings were collected at 20 Hz, thus stimulus frequency could not be included in the analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at each participant's clinical site and was conducted under the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
“The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at each participant’s clinical site and was conducted under the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAll residuals were verified for normality using Quantile-Quantile plots.
“All residuals were verified for normality using Quantile-Quantile plots (see figures E1 and E2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenInformed consent was obtained from the participants after explanation of the nature and possible consequences of the study.
“Informed consent was obtained from the participants after explanation of the nature and possible consequences of the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe β values suggest that phosphenes elicited by paired-electrode stimulation appeared larger than the average of their single-electrode counterparts, but smaller than their sum.
“Across all participants, shape descriptors tended to sum linearly, with the β values suggesting that phosphenes elicited by paired-electrode stimulation appeared larger than the average of their single-electrode counterparts, but smaller than their sum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMore recent studies indicated that phosphenes tend to merge in nontrivial ways.
“But more recent studies indicated that phosphenes tend to merge in nontrivial ways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
PremisecitationThe axon map model predicts that the probability of seeing two phosphenes should increase with increasing distance between their axon bundles (as opposed to distance on the retinal surface).
“Specifically, the axon map model (Beyeler et al 2019b, Granley and Beyeler 2021) predicts that the probability of seeing two phosphenes should increase with increasing distance between their axon bundles (as opposed to distance on the retinal surface), but no empirical studies have validated this hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Beyeler et al 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Granley and Beyeler 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPhosphene appearance varies systematically with stimulus amplitude and frequency.
“In addition, phosphene appearance varies systematically with stimulus amplitude and frequency (Horsager et al 2009, Nanduri et al 2012, Sinclair et al 2016) to the extent that a simple computational model can predict phosphene shape across a wide range of stimulus parameters (Granley and Beyeler 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSequential stimulation does not always lead to perceptually intelligible forms or objects; participants often can only trace an outline of the perceived shape, and their interpretation relies heavily on this basic outline.
“However, sequential stimulation does not always lead to perceptually intelligible forms or objects; often participants are only able to trace an outline of the perceived shape, and their interpretation of the shape relies heavily on this basic outline (Christie et al 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Christie et al 2022 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThere is a linear combination of threshold currents for simultaneous stimulation.
“Horsager et al (2011) found that elicited percepts were affected by other stimulating electrodes (even after temporally staggering pulses to remove electric field interactions) and demonstrated a linear combination of threshold currents for simultaneous stimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Horsager et al 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenData points that fell more than 2.5 standard deviations away from the mean were considered outliers and were removed from all further analyses.
“Data points that fell more than 2.5 standard deviations away from the mean were considered outliers and were removed from all further analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeveral factors might limit the spatial resolution of prosthetic vision, including retinal damage, electrode-retina distance, and inadvertent stimulation of nerve fiber bundles.
“Most recently, Yücel et al (2022) identified several factors that might limit the spatial resolution of prosthetic vision, which included retinal damage, electrode-retina distance, and the inadvertent stimulation of nerve fiber bundles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yücel et al 2022 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPhosphene shape depends strongly on the retinal location of the stimulating electrode, predominantly elongated along the trajectory of the underlying nerve fiber bundle.
“Phosphene shape has been shown to depend strongly on the retinal location of the stimulating electrode, predominantly elongated along the trajectory of the underlying nerve fiber bundle (Rizzo et al 2003, Beyeler et al 2019b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rizzo et al 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Beyeler et al 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe probability of perceiving two distinct phosphenes increases with inter-electrode distance.
“Yücel et al (2022) previously demonstrated that the probability of perceiving two distinct phosphenes increases with inter-electrode distance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yücel et al (2022) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPhosphene orientation was previously shown to depend mostly on the retinal location of the stimulating electrode and was thus excluded from the main analysis.
“Phosphene orientation was previously shown to depend mostly on the retinal location of the stimulating electrode (Beyeler et al 2019b) and was thus excluded from the main analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beyeler et al 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataDuring the preliminary stage, experimenting with a number of similar formulations of splitting the two components gave similar results.
“During the preliminary stage of this study, we experimented with a number of similar formulations of splitting these two components, and all of them gave similar results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationElectrodes that stimulate the same axon bundle (i.e. with zero between-axon distance) are redundant and should therefore be avoided.
“In other words, electrodes that stimulate the same axon bundle (i.e. with zero between-axon distance) are redundant and should therefore be avoided (Beyeler et al 2017b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beyeler et al 2017b
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
PremisecitationUnder the axon map model, paired-electrode stimulation with a short between-axon distance should activate the same nerve fiber bundles and lead to a single phosphene, even if the electrodes are far apart on the retina.
“Under this model, paired-electrode stimulation with a short between-axon distance should activate the same nerve fiber bundles and thus lead to a single phosphene, even though the two electrodes may be far apart on the retina.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beyeler et al 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe axon map model predicts that participants should be more likely to see two distinct phosphenes as the distance between two nerve fiber bundles increases ('between-axon' distance).
“However, the axon map model (Beyeler et al 2019b) makes a more nuanced prediction: participants should be more likely to see two distinct phosphenes as the distance between two nerve fiber bundles increases (‘between-axon’ distance; as opposed to distance on the retinal surface; see Methods).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beyeler et al 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn suprachoroidal prostheses, phosphenes tend to appear thicker or rounder as the stimulation rate increases.
“This relationship between stimulus frequency and phosphene size partially agrees with data from suprachoroidal prostheses, where phosphenes tend to appear thicker or rounder as the stimulation rate increases (Sinclair et al 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sinclair et al 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationMore eccentric phosphenes may be elongated along the trajectory of the underlying nerve fiber bundles.
“While more eccentric phosphenes may be elongated along the trajectory of the underlying nerve fiber bundles (Beyeler et al 2019b), the increased size may be a consequence of ganglion cell receptive fields increasing with eccentricity (Curcio and Allen 1990).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beyeler et al 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSignificant effects were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method.
“Significant effects are marked in bold (corrected for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataOur linear analyses cannot identify nonlinear predictors of phosphene shape.
“Despite the ability of our work to highlight important factors that guide the appearance of phosphenes elicited by retinal implants, it is important to note that our linear analyses cannot identify nonlinear predictors of phosphene shape.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMany computational models of prosthetic vision assume a linear relationship between stimulus parameters (e.g. amplitude) and phosphene appearance (e.g. brightness).
“Many computational models of prosthetic vision (Chen et al 2009, Perez-Yus et al 2017, Sanchez-Garcia et al 2019, Granley and Beyeler 2021) assume a linear relationship between stimulus parameters (e.g. amplitude) and phosphene appearance (e.g. brightness).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataOur analyses are currently limited to single- and paired-electrode stimulation in three participants.
“In addition, due to data availability, our analyses are currently limited to single- and paired-electrode stimulation in three participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMost phosphene models assume a constant scaling factor between retinal and visual field coordinates.
“Indeed, most phosphene models assume a constant scaling factor between retinal and visual field coordinates (Horsager et al 2009, Nanduri 2011, Beyeler et al 2019b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Horsager et al 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nanduri 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Beyeler et al 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMultiple phosphene patterns may not automatically group into perceptually intelligible objects.
“However, it should be noted that multiple phosphene patterns may not automatically group into perceptually intelligible objects (Stingl et al 2015, Shivdasani et al 2017, Christie et al 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
The paper relies on this without support.
Less is known about how phosphenes combine when multiple electrodes are stimulated.
“However, less is known about how phosphenes combine when multiple electrodes are stimulated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Understanding how multi-electrode stimulation can be leveraged to produce form vision remains an open challenge for the field of visual prosthetics.
“Therefore, understanding how multi-electrode stimulation can be leveraged to produce form vision (that is, a fundamental aspect of visual perception that enables humans to recognize spatial patterns and objects) remains an open challenge for the field of visual prosthetics.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No empirical studies have validated the axon map model's prediction that the probability of seeing two phosphenes increases with between-axon distance.
“but no empirical studies have validated this hypothesis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Linear summation of phosphenes has not been demonstrated empirically.
“but this has yet to be demonstrated empirically.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The simulated axonal nerve fiber bundle map derived from sighted individuals is applicable to the three blind participants with retinitis pigmentosa.
“The stimulated implant was placed on a simulated map of axonal nerve fiber bundles (figure 2), which was modeled based on ophthalmic fundus photographs of 55 sighted participants (Jansonius et al 2009).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The number of distinct phosphenes drawn by participants corresponds to the number of phosphenes they perceived.
“Participants were asked to perform a drawing task upon electrical stimulation of the retina.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The participants' drawings accurately represent their perceived phosphenes.
“As participants would frequently draw multiple phosphenes during paired-electrode stimulation (figure 7), we extracted each shape descriptor for each individual phosphene.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Empirical data show that phosphenes are not symmetric, either for retinal or cortical implants.
“However, empirical data show that phosphenes are not symmetric, either for retinal101 or cortical42 implants.”
From Visual Prostheses in the Era of Artificial Intelligence Technology (2025) · cites this paper as [101]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Abstract and Methods give different drawing counts
MinorThe abstract says 3548 phosphene drawings were analyzed, whereas the Methods say 3574 drawings remained after exclusions and were prepared for statistical analysis.
“We retrospectively analyzed 3548 phosphene drawings made by three blind participants implanted with an Argus II Retinal Prosthesis.”
“The remaining 3574 drawings (2717 single-electrode drawings and 857 paired-electrode drawings; see table 2) were prepared for statistical analysis (explained in section 2.8).”
Not all retained paired-electrode data points appear in every analysis
MinorThe Methods say all 101 retained paired-electrode data points were included in all analyses, but the all-participant analysis in Table 7 reports N = 85.
“The remaining 353 data points (252 single-electrode percepts, 101 paired-electrode percepts) were included in all analyses.”
“| | Participant 1 (N = 45) β | Participant 1 (N = 45) r | Participant 2 (N = 9) β | Participant 2 (N = 9) r | Participant 3 (N = 31) β | Participant 3 (N = 31) r | All Participants (N = 85) β | All Participants (N = 85) r |”
Cites
Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants
Hu, M.-K. (1962) · IRE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1962.1057692 · Cited by 7,594 · see citing works
Russell, S., Bennett, J., Wellman, J. A., Chung, D. C., Yu, Z.-F., Tillman, A., Wittes, J., Pappas, J., Elci, O., McCague, S., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31868-8 · Cited by 1,952 · see citing works
Topography of ganglion cells in human retina
Curcio, C. A., & Allen, K. A. (1990) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903000103 · Cited by 1,849 · see citing works
Hamel, C. (2006) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/1750-1172-1-40 · Cited by 962 · see citing works
Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words
Zrenner, E., Bartz-Schmidt, K. U., Benav, H., Besch, D., Bruckmann, A., Gabel, V.-P., Gekeler, F., Greppmaier, U., Harscher, A., Kibbel, S., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1747 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
da Cruz, L., Fynes, K., Georgiadis, O., Kerby, J., Luo, Y. H.-L., Ahmado, A., Vernon, A. J., Daniels, J. T., Nommiste, B., Hasan, S. M., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4114 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
Metamers of the ventral stream
Freeman, J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2889 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
Rizzo, J. F., Wyatt, J., Loewenstein, J., Kelly, S., & Shire, D. (2003) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.02-0817 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
Subretinal visual implant alpha IMS - clinical trial interim report
Stingl, K., Bartz-Schmidt, K. U., Besch, D., Chee, C. K., Cottriall, C. L., Gekeler, F., Groppe, M., Jackson, T. L., MacLaren, R. E., Koitschev, A., et al. (2015) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.001 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
The Argus® II Retinal Prosthesis System
Luo, Y. H.-L., & da Cruz, L. (2016) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.09.003 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Dynamic Stimulation of Visual Cortex Produces Form Vision in Sighted and Blind Humans
Beauchamp, M. S., Oswalt, D., Sun, P., Foster, B. L., Magnotti, J. F., Niketeghad, S., Pouratian, N., Bosking, W. H., & Yoshor, D. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.033 · Cited by 257 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Indeed, human participants implanted with cortical surface electrodes required a dynamic stimulation strategy to allow for perceptual grouping (Beauchamp et al 2020).”
Shape perception via a high-channel-count neuroprosthesis in monkey visual cortex
Chen, X., Wang, F., Fernandez, E., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abd7435 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Fernández, E., Alfaro, A., Soto-Sánchez, C., Gonzalez-Lopez, P., Lozano, A. M., Peña, S., Grima, M. D., Rodil, A., Gómez, B., Chen, X., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci151331 · Cited by 250 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although a recent study with intra-cortical electrodes (Chen et al 2020) showed that macaques could successfully identify the intended shape of a patterned electrical stimulus, human participants implanted with the same technology could not always do that (Fernández et al 2021).”
Factors affecting perceptual thresholds in epiretinal prostheses
de Balthasar, C., Patel, S., Roy, A., Freda, R., Greenwald, S., Horsager, A., Mahadevappa, M., Yanai, D., McMahon, M. J., Humayun, M. S., et al. (2008) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0696 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Self-citationPerceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects
Mahadevappa, M., Weiland, J. D., Yanai, D., Fine, I., Greenberg, R. J., & Humayun, M. S. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2005.848687 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-citationGasparini, S. J., Llonch, S., Borsch, O., & Ader, M. (2018) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.11.001 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Simulating prosthetic vision: I. Visual models of phosphenes
Chen, S. C., Suaning, G. J., Morley, J. W., & Lovell, N. H. (2009) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.003 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Nanduri, D., Fine, I., Horsager, A., Boynton, G. M., Humayun, M. S., Greenberg, R. J., & Weiland, J. D. (2012) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8401 · Cited by 163 · cited 4× · see citing works
“First reported by Nanduri et al (2012), pulse frequency seemed to affect phosphene shape differently than amplitude (figure 6).”
InfluentialWilke, R., Gabel, V.-P., Sachs, H., Bartz Schmidt, K.-U., Gekeler, F., Besch, D., Szurman, P., Stett, A., Wilhelm, B., Peters, T., et al. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6946 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Jansonius, N. M., Nevalainen, J., Selig, B., Zangwill, L. M., Sample, P. A., Budde, W. M., Jonas, J. B., Lagrèze, W. A., Airaksinen, P. J., Vonthein, R., et al. (2009) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.029 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
A model of ganglion axon pathways accounts for percepts elicited by retinal implants
Beyeler, M., Nanduri, D., Weiland, J. D., Rokem, A., Boynton, G. M., & Fine, I. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-45416-4 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationFactors Affecting Perceptual Threshold in Argus II Retinal Prosthesis Subjects
Ahuja, A. K., Yeoh, J., Dorn, J. D., Caspi, A., Wuyyuru, V., McMahon, M. J., Humayun, M. S., Greenberg, R. J., daCruz, L., & Argus II Study Group (2013) · Translational Vision Science & Technology · doi:10.1167/tvst.2.4.1 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Electric crosstalk impairs spatial resolution of multi-electrode arrays in retinal implants
Wilke, R. G. H., Moghadam, G. K., Lovell, N. H., Suaning, G. J., & Dokos, S. (2011) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046016 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Predicting visual sensitivity in retinal prosthesis patients
Horsager, A., Greenwald, S. H., Weiland, J. D., Humayun, M. S., Greenberg, R. J., McMahon, M. J., Boynton, G. M., & Fine, I. (2009) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2595 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationBeyeler, M., Rokem, A., Boynton, G. M., & Fine, I. (2017) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aa795e · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Self-citationElectrical Stimulation of the Retina to Produce Artificial Vision
Weiland, J. D., Walston, S. T., & Humayun, M. S. (2016) · Annual Review of Vision Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114425 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationRoelfsema, P. R. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.03.016 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Retinal prosthesis phosphene shape analysis
Nanduri, D., Humayun, M. S., Greenberg, R. J., McMahon, M. J., & Weiland, J. D. (2008) · 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · doi:10.1109/iembs.2008.4649524 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional Outcome in Subretinal Electronic Implants Depends on Foveal Eccentricity
Štingl, K., Bartz‐Schmidt, K. U., Gekeler, F., Kusnyerik, Á., Sachs, H. G., & Zrenner, E. (2013) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12835 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
The appearance of phosphenes elicited using a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis
Sinclair, N. C., Shivdasani, M. N., Perera, T., Gillespie, L. N., McDermott, H. J., Ayton, L. N., Blamey, P. J., & for the Bionic Vision Australia Consortium (2016) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.15-18991 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
End-to-end optimization of prosthetic vision
de Ruyter van Steveninck, J., Güçlü, U., van Wezel, R., & van Gerven, M. (2022) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.22.2.20 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
End-to-end optimization of prosthetic vision
de Ruyter van Steveninck, J., Güçlü, U., van Wezel, R., & van Gerven, M. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.12.19.423601 · Cited by 54 · cited 2× · see citing works
“These results may thus inform recent AI-based stimulus optimization algorithms (Spencer et al 2019, Granley et al 2022, Relic et al 2022, de Ruyter van Steveninck et al 2022), which aim to select the optimal stimulation parameters on each electrode based on their predicted effect on phosphene…”
Temporal interactions during paired-electrode stimulation in two retinal prosthesis subjects
Horsager, A., Boynton, G. M., Greenberg, R. J., & Fine, I. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5282 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Luo, Y. H.-L., Zhong, J. J., Clemo, M., & da Cruz, L. (2016) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.07.021 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Foik, A. T., Lean, G. A., Scholl, L. R., et al. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1279-18.2018 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Oswalt, D. N., Bosking, W. H., Sun, P., Sheth, S. A., Niketeghad, S., Salas, M. A., Patel, U. K., Greenberg, R. J., Dorn, J. D., Pouratian, N., et al. (2021) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2021.08.024 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Shivdasani, M. N., Sinclair, N. C., Gillespie, L. N., Petoe, M. A., Titchener, S. A., Fallon, J. B., Perera, T., Pardinas-Diaz, D., Barnes, N. M., Blamey, P. J., et al. (2017) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.16-21311 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Global activity shaping strategies for a retinal implant
Spencer, M. J., Kameneva, T., Grayden, D. B., Meffin, H., & Burkitt, A. N. (2019) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aaf071 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
pulse2percept: A Python-based simulation framework for bionic visionPreprint
Beyeler, M., Boynton, G. M., Fine, I., & Rokem, A. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/148015 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationA computational model of phosphene appearance for epiretinal prostheses
Granley, J., & Beyeler, M. (2021) · 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc46164.2021.9629663 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationDepth and motion cues with phosphene patterns for prosthetic vision
Perez-Yus, A., Bermudez-Cameo, J., Guerrero, J. J., & Lopez-Nicolas, G. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW) · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2017.179 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Deep Learning–Based Perceptual Stimulus Encoder for Bionic Vision
Relic, L., Zhang, B., Tuan, Y.-L., & Beyeler, M. (2022) · Augmented Humans International Conference (AHs) · doi:10.1145/3519391.3524034 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationIndoor scenes understanding for visual prosthesis with fully convolutional networks
Sanchez-Garcia, M., Martinez-Cantin, R., & Guerrero, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications · doi:10.5220/0007257602180225 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Song, X., Qiu, S., Shivdasani, M. N., Zhou, F., Liu, Z., Ma, S., Chai, X., Chen, Y., Cai, X., Guo, T., et al. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac5b18 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Hybrid Neural Autoencoders for Stimulus Encoding in Visual and Other Sensory Neuroprostheses
Granley, J., Relic, L., & Beyeler, M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.13623 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationProsthetic vision in blind human patients: Predicting the percepts of epiretinal stimulation
Nanduri, D. (2015) · University of Southern California Digital Library · doi:10.25549/usctheses-c3-196626 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationFactors affecting two-point discrimination in argus II patients
Yücel, E. I., Sadeghi, R., Kartha, A., Montezuma, S. R., Dagnelie, G., Rokem, A., Boynton, G. M., Fine, I., & Beyeler, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.901337 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationSequential epiretinal stimulation improves discrimination in simple shape discrimination tasks only
Christie, B., Sadeghi, R., Kartha, A., Caspi, A., Tenore, F. V., Klatzky, R. L., Dagnelie, G., & Billings, S. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac7326 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
McGregor, J. E. (2019) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.003 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Explainable machine learning predictions of perceptual sensitivity for retinal prostheses
Pogoncheff, G., Hu, Z., Rokem, A., & Beyeler, M. (2024) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad310f · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationExplainable Machine Learning Predictions of Perceptual Sensitivity for Retinal Prostheses
Pogoncheff, G., Hu, Z., Rokem, A., & Beyeler, M. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.02.09.23285633 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationGreedy Optimization of Electrode Arrangement for Epiretinal Prostheses
Bruce, A., & Beyeler, M. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16449-1_57 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationHybrid Neural Autoencoders for Stimulus Encoding in Visual and Other Sensory Neuroprostheses.
Granley, J., Relic, L., & Beyeler, M. (2022) · PubMed · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationModel-Based Recommendations for Optimal Surgical Placement of Epiretinal Implants
Beyeler, M., Boynton, G. M., Fine, I., & Rokem, A. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32254-0_44 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationBeyeler, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00471 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Barry, 2020, Video-mode percepts are smaller than sums of single-electrode phosphenes with the Orion® visual cortical prosthesis, Investigative Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 61, 927
- Hou, 2023, Phosphene shape elicited by paired-electrode stimulation is well predicted by single-electrode parameters for three Argus II users, Investigative Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 64, 4613
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluating Deep Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Retinal Implants Using Sighted Participants
Schoinas, E., Rastogi, A., Carter, A., Granley, J., & Beyeler, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.00177 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationVisual Prostheses in the Era of Artificial Intelligence Technology
Sarbout, I., Gungor, A., Ounissi, M., Zaher, S., Ptito, M., Kupers, R., Racoceanu, D., & Milea, D. (2025) · Eye and Brain · doi:10.2147/eb.s524322 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“101 Finally, 5 studies did not use prior on phosphene shapes, and these were conducted with empirically measured data.”
- Authors
- Hou, Y., Nanduri, D., Granley, J., Weiland, J. D., & Beyeler, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hou, Yuchen
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2024-04-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 026031
- ISSN
- 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2560
- PMC
- PMC11003296
- OpenAlex
- W4392578333
- Semantic Scholar
- a63fddcca793c01cc1ead454e8cdcd4c8453508e
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (R00-EY029329)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- Argus II retinal prosthesis, phosphenes, linear summation, epiretinal stimulation, stimulus amplitude, blind patients
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review