Cited by 9Mast cells and histamineFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchEosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes

The diagnostic workup for systemic mastocytosis differs from consensus recommendations: results of a worldwide survey

Open access
Pyatilova, Polina, Bernstein, Jonathan A., Aulenbacher, Felix, Borges, Mario Sanchez, Dimitrijević, Saša, Hoehn, Gerard, Maurer, Marcus, Kolkhir, Pavel +1 more·2023·World Allergy Organization Journal

Abstract

Objective Mastocytosis is a complex disorder affecting various organs. The diagnostic workup can be challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach including the use of uncommon tests. To assess mastocytosis management around the globe, we conducted the first worldwide online survey for physicians. Methods A 21-item questionnaire was sent out to the members of the World Allergy Organization (WAO), the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA 2 LEN), the Urticaria (UCARE) and Angioedema (ACARE) Centers of Reference and Excellence, the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), and the European Mast Cell and Basophil Research Network (EMBRN) in April–June 2021. Results Across 628 respondents from 79 countries 87.7% and 9.7% of physicians were allergists/clinical immunologists and/or dermatologists. Participating physicians were from all regions of the world (Europe, EU: 41.6%; North America, NA: 24.8%; Latin America, LA: 14.5%; Asia-Pacific, AP: 12.6%; and Africa/Middle East, AME: 6.5%). Only 2.2% of respondents worked at Specialized Mastocytosis Centers (SMCs) in North America or European Union. Physicians reported caring for 4 patients with mastocytosis per year, with higher numbers in European Union and Asia Pacific (5/year) compared to Latin America (2/year). Dermatologists and physicians who work at SMCs reported higher patient numbers (15/year and 80/year, respectively). Suspicion of mastocytosis in the allergology and dermatology community is commonly driven by anaphylaxis (82.9%), mastocytosis skin lesions (82.1%), or elevated tryptase levels (76.6%). Osteoporosis and gastrointestinal symptoms less often prompted suspicion of mastocytosis (21.4% and 49.9%, respectively). World Health Organisation (WHO)-diagnostic criteria and classification, regardless of the region, are only used by about 50% of physicians, with higher rates for SMCs (83.3%). Serum tryptase, bone marrow biopsy, and KIT D816V mutation analysis are included in the diagnostic workup by 90.9%, 61.5%, and 58.4% of physicians, respectively. The biggest challenges for the management of mastocytosis are the lack of more effective treatment options (51.1%), missing multidisciplinary networks (47.1%), and the lack of experience of specialists from other disciplines (39.0%). Conclusions The diagnostic workup for mastocytosis differs from consensus recommendations and varies between regions. This may be improved by establishing active multidisciplinary networks, increasing access to diagnostic procedures, consistently applying WHO criteria, and developing new Mastocytosis Centers of Reference and Excellence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100838

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most cases of ISM present a clinical picture dominated by mediator-related symptoms, including cutaneous, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and neurocognitive manifestations.

    “Conversely, most cases of ISM present a clinical picture dominated by mediator-related symptoms, including cutaneous, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and neurocognitive manifestations (54–56).”

    From Defining “Normal” basal serum tryptase levels: a context-dependent approach to improve diagnostics in systemic mastocytosis (2025) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Introduction describes mastocytosis affecting the skin, musculoskeletal system, and gastrointestinal tract, and the Results identify skin lesions and gastrointestinal symptoms as reasons physicians suspect mastocytosis. But these passages concern mastocytosis generally and diagnostic suspicion; they do not establish that most ISM cases are dominated by mediator-related symptoms or document neurocognitive manifestations. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In cases with less specific manifestations (gastrointestinal symptoms, fatigue, neurologic/neuropsychiatric manifestations), recommendations for testing BST are not standardized.

    “In all these cases, the recommendations for testing BST are not standardized (53–55, 65).”

    From Defining “Normal” basal serum tryptase levels: a context-dependent approach to improve diagnostics in systemic mastocytosis (2025) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Results sections report that gastrointestinal symptoms less often prompted suspicion of mastocytosis and that 90.9% of surveyed physicians included serum baseline tryptase in their diagnostic workup. The Discussion describes differences between physicians’ workups and consensus recommendations, but no passage found addresses whether recommendations for testing tryptase in patients with gastrointestinal, fatigue, or neurologic symptoms are standardized. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Pyatilova, P., Bernstein, J. A., Aulenbacher, F., Borges, M. S., Dimitrijević, S., Hoehn, G., Maurer, M., Kolkhir, P., & Siebenhaar, F.
Affiliations
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Blueprint Medicines (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Siebenhaar, Frank
Venue
World Allergy Organization Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
16
Issue
11
Pages
100838
ISSN
1939-4551 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388496723
Cited by
9
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Allergy Organization Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
Keywords
systemic mastocytosis, diagnostic workup, clinical practice patterns, WHO diagnostic criteria, serum tryptase, bone marrow biopsy, KIT D816V mutation, anaphylaxis, physician survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review