Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 329

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The need to integrate flood and drought disaster risk reduction strategies

Open access
Ward, Philip J., de Ruiter, Marleen C., Mård, Johanna, Schröter, Kai, Van Loon, Anne, Veldkamp, Ted, von Uexkull, Nina, Wanders, Niko, AghaKouchak, Amir, Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Karsten, Capewell, Lucinda, Carmen Llasat, Maria, Day, Rosie, Dewals, Benjamin, Di Baldassarre, Giuliano, Huning, Laurie S., Kreibich, Heidi, Mazzoleni, Maurizio, Savelli, Elisa, Teutschbein, Claudia, van den Berg, Harmen, van der Heijden, Anne, Vincken, Jelle M.R., Waterloo, Maarten J., Wens, Marthe·2020·Water Security
DOI 10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100070
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Most research on hydrological risks focuses either on flood risk or drought risk, whilst floods and droughts are two extremes of the same hydrological cycle. To better design disaster risk reduction (DRR) measures and strategies, it is important to consider interactions between these closely linked phenomena. We show examples of: (a) how flood or drought DRR measures can have (unintended) positive or negative impacts on risk of the opposite hazard; and (b) how flood or drought DRR measures can be negatively impacted by the opposite hazard. We focus on dikes and levees, dams, stormwater control and upstream measures, subsurface storage, migration, agricultural practices, and vulnerability and preparedness. We identify key challenges for moving towards a more holistic risk management approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100070

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

  • Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change

    Buhaug, H., & von Uexkull, N. (2021) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-014708 · Cited by 187

    “Complementary socioeconomic markers of vulnerability at higher levels of social aggregation include widespread inequality, poor infrastructure, lack of early warning systems for extreme weather conditions, corrupt and inefficient markets, a large rainfed agricultural sector, and import dependence of basic foodstuffs (…”
    BackgroundSelf-citation

See all 329

Metadata

Authors
Ward, P. J., de Ruiter, M. C., Mård, J., Schröter, K., Van Loon, A., Veldkamp, T., von Uexkull, N., Wanders, N., AghaKouchak, A., Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., Capewell, L., Carmen Llasat, M., Day, R., Dewals, B., Di Baldassarre, G., Huning, L. S., Kreibich, H., Mazzoleni, M., Savelli, E., Teutschbein, C., van den Berg, H., van der Heijden, A., Vincken, J. M. R., Waterloo, M. J., & Wens, M.
Venue
Water Security
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
11
Pages
100070
ISSN
2468-3124 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100070
OpenAlex
W3098424670
Cited by
329
References
3
FWCI
12.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The need to integrate flood and drought disaster risk reduction strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100070
The paper
Ward, P. J., de Ruiter, M. C., Mård, J., Schröter, K., Van Loon, A., Veldkamp, T., von Uexkull, N., Wanders, N., AghaKouchak, A., Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., Capewell, L., Carmen Llasat, M., Day, R., Dewals, B., Di Baldassarre, G., Huning, L. S., Kreibich, H., Mazzoleni, M., Savelli, E., . . . Wens, M. (2020). The need to integrate flood and drought disaster risk reduction strategies. Water Security. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100070

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.