The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Valorization of post-consumer waste plastic in cementitious concrete composites
Open accessAbstract
The sheer amount of disposable bottles being produced nowadays makes it imperative to identify alternative procedures for recycling them since they are non-biodegradable. This paper describes an innovative use of consumed plastic bottle waste as sand-substitution aggregate within composite materials for building application. Particularly, bottles made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) have been used as partial and complete substitutes for sand in concrete composites. Various volume fractions of sand varying from 2% to 100% were substituted by the same volume of granulated plastic, and various sizes of PET aggregates were used. The bulk density and mechanical characteristics of the composites produced were evaluated. To study the relationship between mechanical properties and composite microstructure, scanning electron microscopy technique was employed. The results presented show that substituting sand at a level below 50% by volume with granulated PET, whose upper granular limit equals 5mm, affects neither the compressive strength nor the flexural strength of composites. This study demonstrates that plastic bottles shredded into small PET particles may be used successfully as sand-substitution aggregates in cementitious concrete composites. These new composites would appear to offer an attractive low-cost material with consistent properties; moreover, they would help in resolving some of the solid waste problems created by plastics production and in saving energy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Use of plastic waste as aggregate in cement mortar and concrete preparation: A review
Saikia, N., & de Brito, J. (2012) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.066 · Cited by 709
Plastic wastes to construction products: Status, limitations and future perspective
Awoyera, P. O., & Adesina, A. (2020) · Case Studies in Construction Materials · doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00330 · Cited by 431
Eco-friendly concrete containing recycled plastic as partial replacement for sand
Almeshal, I., Tayeh, B. A., Alyousef, R., Alabduljabbar, H., & Mohamed, A. M. (2020) · Journal of Materials Research and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.02.090 · Cited by 319
Mechanical and physical properties and morphology of concrete containing plastic waste as aggregate
Belmokaddem, M., Mahi, A., Senhadji, Y., & Pekmezci, B. Y. (2020) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119559 · Cited by 256
Recycling of poly(ethylene terephthalate) – A review focusing on chemical methods
Geyer, B., Lorenz, G., & Kandelbauer, A. (2016) · Express Polymer Letters · doi:10.3144/expresspolymlett.2016.53 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Marzouk, O. Y., Dheilly, R. M., & Queneudec, M.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 310-318
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162252343
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Valorization of post-consumer waste plastic in cementitious concrete composites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.012
- The paper
- Marzouk, O. Y., Dheilly, R. M., & Queneudec, M. (2007). Valorization of post-consumer waste plastic in cementitious concrete composites. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.