The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of waste management practices and their impact on human health
Open accessAbstract
This work reviews (i) the most recent information on waste arisings and waste disposal options in the world, in the European Union (EU), in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OEDC) countries, and in some developing countries (notably China) and (ii) the potential direct and indirect impact of waste management activities on health. Though the main focus is primarily on municipal solid waste (MSW), exposure to bioaerosols from composting facilities and to pathogens from sewage treatment plants are considered. The reported effects of radioactive waste are also briefly reviewed. Hundreds of epidemiological studies reported on the incidence of a wide range of possible illnesses on employees of waste facilities and on the resident population. The main conclusion of the overall assessment of the literature is that the evidence of adverse health outcomes for the general population living near landfill sites, incinerators, composting facilities and nuclear installations is usually insufficient and inconclusive. There is convincing evidence of a high risk of gastrointestinal problems associated with pathogens originating at sewage treatment plants. In order to improve the quality and usefulness of epidemiological studies applied to populations residing in areas where waste management facilities are located or planned, preference should be given to prospective cohort studies of sufficient statistical power, with access to direct human exposure measurements, and supported by data on health effect biomarkers and susceptibility biomarkers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04337-3 · Cited by 5,373
Freiman, J. A., Chalmers, T. C., Smith, H., & Kuebler, R. R. (1978) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197809282991304 · Cited by 1,628
Cited by
Solid waste issue: sources, composition, disposal, recycling, and valorization
Abdel-Shafy, H. I., & Mansour, M. S. M. (2018) · Egyptian Journal of Petroleum · doi:10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.07.003 · Cited by 1,686
Siddiqua, A., Hahladakis, J. N., & Al-Attiya, W. A. K. A. (2022) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-21578-z · Cited by 1,021
Khan, S., Anjum, R., Raza, S. T., Ahmed Bazai, N., & Ihtisham, M. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132403 · Cited by 438
Ziraba, A. K., Haregu, T. N., & Mberu, B. (2016) · Archives of Public Health · doi:10.1186/s13690-016-0166-4 · Cited by 312
Vongdala, N., Tran, H.-D., Xuan, T. D., Teschke, R., & Khanh, T. D. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16010022 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Giusti, L.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2227-2239
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101719234
- Cited by
- 880
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of waste management practices and their impact on human health. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.028
- The paper
- Giusti, L. (2009). A review of waste management practices and their impact on human health. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.