Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management
Abstract
Research interests in addressing construction and demolition (C&D) waste management issues have resulted in a large amount of publications during the last decade. This study demonstrates that there is no systematic examination on the research development in literature in the discipline of C&D waste management. This study presents the latest research trend in the discipline through analyzing the publications from 2000 to 2009 in eight major international journals. The analysis is conducted on the number of papers published annually, main authors' contributions, research methods and data analysis methods adopted, and research topics covered. The results exhibit an increasing research interest in C&D waste management in recent years. Researchers from developed economies have contributed significantly to the development of the research in the discipline. Some developing countries such as Malaysia and China have also been making good efforts in promoting C&D waste management research. The findings from this study also indicate that survey and case study are major methods for data collection, and the data are mostly processed through descriptive analysis. It is anticipated that more future studies on C&D waste management will be led by researchers from developing economies, where construction works will remain their major economic activities. On the other hand, more sophisticated modeling and simulating techniques have been used effectively in a number of studies on C&D waste manag…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Project clients, main contractors and subcontractors are more concerned about the economic benefits of managing construction waste than about environmental and social impacts.
“Whereas the other group comprises project clients, main contractors and subcontractors, who are more concerned about the economic benefits of managing construction waste, which is the reality in this sector [1].”
From Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Waste minimisation through deconstruction: A BIM based Deconstructability Assessment Score (BIM-DAS)
Akinade, O. O., Oyedele, L. O., Bilal, M., Ajayi, S. O., Owolabi, H. A., Alaka, H. A., & Bello, S. A. (2015) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.018 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Duan, H., Wang, J., & Huang, Q. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.069 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Construction and demolition waste research: A bibliometric analysis
Wu, H., Zuo, J., Zillante, G., Wang, J., & Yuan, H. (2019) · Architectural Science Review · doi:10.1080/00038628.2018.1564646 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Self-citationCircular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach
Jahan, I., Zhang, G., Bhuiyan, M., & Navaratnam, S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141710478 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yuan, H., & Shen, L.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Yuan, Hongping
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 670-679
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030265818
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Waste Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- construction and demolition waste, research trends, research methodology, developing countries, human factors, computer simulation, case studies
- MeSH terms
- Construction Materials, Humans, Industrial Waste, Publications, Research, Research Design, Research Personnel, Waste Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review