CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 58

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Correlation between physicochemical and ecotoxicological approaches to estimate landfill leachates toxicity

Pablos, M.V., Martini, F., Fernández, C., Babín, M.M., Herraez, I., Miranda, J., Martínez, J., Carbonell, G., San-Segundo, L., García-Hortigüela, P., Tarazona, J.V.·2011·Waste Management
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.022
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Leachates from municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills may contain a huge diversity of contaminants; these wastewaters should be considered as potentially hazardous complex mixtures, representing a potential environmental risk for surface and groundwater. Current MSW landfill wastes regulatory approaches deem exclusively on the physicochemical characterization and does not contemplate the ecotoxicological assessment of landfill leachates. However, the presence of highly toxic substances in consumer products requires reconsideration on the need of more specific ecotoxicological assessments. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity of different MSW landfill leachates using a battery of toxicity tests including acute toxicity tests with Daphnia magna and the anuran Xenopus laevis and the in vitro toxicity test with the fish cell line RTG-2. The additional objective was to study the possible correlation between physicochemical properties and the toxicity results obtained for untreated landfill leachates. The results showed that the proposed test battery was effective for the ecotoxicological characterization of MSW landfill leachates. A moderate to strong correlation between the measured physicochemical parameters and the calculated toxicity units was detected for all toxicity assays. Correlation factors of 0.85, 0.86 and 0.55 for Daphnia, Xenopus and RTG-2 tests, respectively, were found. The discriminant analysis showed that certain physicochemical parameters could…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TDW obtained from the primary dyeing process is classified as very toxic according to the toxicity classification based on toxic units reported by Pablos et al. [30].

    “According to the toxicity classification based on toxic units (TU) reported by Pablos et al. [30], where the toxicity expressed in terms of TU is calculated according to Equation (1), the TDW obtained from the primary dyeing process is classified as very toxic.”

    From Reuse of Textile Dyeing Wastewater Treated by Electrooxidation (2022) · cites this paper as Pablos et al. [30]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Alkassasbeh, 2009, Toxicity testing and the effect of landfill leachate in Malaysia on behaviour of common carp, Am. J. Environ. Sci., 5, 209, 10.3844/ajessp.2009.209.217 · DOI
  2. Atwater, 1983, Experiments using Daphnia to measure landfill leachate toxicity, Water Res., 17, 1855, 10.1016/0043-1354(83)90209-9 · DOI
  3. Babín, 2005, In vitro toxicity of selected pesticides on RTG-2 and RTL-W1 cell lines, Environ. Pollut., 135, 267, 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.11.001 · DOI
  4. Borenfreund, 1985, Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorption, Toxicol. Lett., 24, 119, 10.1016/0378-4274(85)90046-3 · DOI
  5. Bortolotto, 2009, Evaluation of the toxic and genotoxic potential of landfill leachates using bioassays, Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 28, 288, 10.1016/j.etap.2009.05.007 · DOI
  6. Castaño, 1996, Correlations between the RTG-2 cytotoxicity test EC50 and in vivo LC50 rainbow trout bioassay, Chemosphere, 32, 2141, 10.1016/0045-6535(96)00126-9 · DOI
  7. Clément, 1995, The contribution of ammonia and alkalinity to landfill leachate toxicity to duckweed, Sci. Total Environ., 170, 71, 10.1016/0048-9697(95)04563-G · DOI
  8. Clément, 1996, Estimation of the hazard of landfills through toxicity testing of leachates. 1: Determination of leachate toxicity with a battery of acute tests, Chemosphere, 33, 2303, 10.1016/0045-6535(96)00322-0 · DOI
  9. Clément, 1997, Estimation of the hazard of landfills through toxicity testing of leachates. 2: Comparison of physic-chemical characteristics of landfill leachates with their toxicity determined with a battery of tests, Chemosphere, 35, 2783, 10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00332-9 · DOI
  10. Ferrari, 2006, Predicting uncertainty in the ecotoxicological assessment of solid waste leachates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 7012, 10.1021/es052491z · DOI
  11. Isidori, 2003, Toxicity identification evaluation of leachates from municipal solid waste landfills: a multispecies approach, Chemosphere, 52, 85, 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00298-4 · DOI
  12. ISO 6341, 1996. Water Quality. Determination of The Inhibition of the Mobility of Daphnia Magna Straus (Cladocera, Crustacea). Acute Toxicity Test. Third edition.
  13. Kjeldsen, 2002, Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: a review, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 297, 10.1080/10643380290813462 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Kotz, J.C., Treichel, P.M., Townsend, J.R., 2009. Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity, seventh ed., vol. 2. Thomson Higher Educations, Belmont, USA.
  15. Lapa, 2002, Ecotoxicological assessment of leachates from MSWI bottom ashes, Waste Manage., 22, 583, 10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00009-0 · DOI
  16. Leitbig, 2007, Comparison of bioassays by testing whole soil and their water extract from contaminated sites, Chemosphere, 66, 428, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.06.024 · DOI
  17. Li, H.-S., Zhou, S.-Q., Sun, Y.-B., Feng, P., Li, J.-D., 2009. Advanced treatment of landfill leachate by a new combination process in a full-scale plant. doi:10.1016/j.hazmat.2009.07.034. · DOI
  18. Olivero-Verbel, 2008, Relationship between physicochemical parameters and the toxicity of leachates from a municipal solid waste landfill, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 70, 294, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.05.016 · DOI
  19. Pablos, 2009, Use of a novel battery of bioassays for the biological characterisation of hazardous wastes, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 72, 1594, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.12.016 · DOI
  20. Pivato, 2006, Acute toxicity test of leachates from traditional and sustainable landfills using luminescent bacteria, Waste Manage., 26, 1148, 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.10.008 · DOI
  21. Schulz, 1995, Toxicity assessment of waste water samples with fish cell lines, ALTEX, 12, 188
  22. Sisinno, 2000, Toxicity evaluation of a municipal dump leachate using zebrafish acute tests, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 64, 107, 10.1007/s001289910017 · DOI
  23. Slomczyńska, 2004, Physico-chemical and toxicological characteristics of leachates from MSW landfills, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 13, 627
  24. Sprague, 1965, Lethal effects of mixed copper and zinc solutions for juvenile salmon, J. Fish Res. Board Can., 22, 425, 10.1139/f65-042 · DOI
  25. Thomas, 2009, Bioassays for the evaluation of landfill leachate toxicity, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B, 12, 83, 10.1080/10937400802545292 · DOI
  26. Tinsley, 2004, The use of direct toxicity assessment in the assessment and control of complex effluents in the UK: a demonstration programme, Ecotoxicology, 13, 423, 10.1023/B:ECTX.0000035293.45360.f6 · DOI
  27. Ward, 2002, Determinating toxicity of leachates from Florida municipal solid waste landfills using a battery-of-tests approach, Environ. Toxicol., 17, 258, 10.1002/tox.10053 · DOI
  28. Ward, 2005, Heavy metal binding capacity (HMBC) of municipal solid waste landfill leachates, Chemosphere, 60, 206, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.12.054 · DOI
  29. Wharfe, 2004, Hazardous chemicals in complex mixtures – a role for direct toxicity assessment, Ecotoxicology, 13, 413, 10.1023/B:ECTX.0000035292.00099.f0 · DOI
  30. Wilke, 2008, Ecotoxicological characterization of hazardous wastes, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 70, 283, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.10.003 · DOI
  31. Žaltauskaitė, 2008, Assessment of landfill leachate toxicity using higher plants, Environ. Res. Eng. Manage., 4, 42

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pablos, M. V., Martini, F., Fernández, C., Babín, M. M., Herraez, I., Miranda, J., Martínez, J., Carbonell, G., San-Segundo, L., García-Hortigüela, P., & Tarazona, J. V.
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
31
Issue
8
Pages
1841-1847
ISSN
0956-053X
DOI
10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.022
Cited by
58
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review