The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Precious metal recovery from waste printed circuit boards using cyanide and non-cyanide lixiviants – A review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
E-waste: An assessment of global production and environmental impacts
Robinson, B. H. (2009) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.044 · Cited by 1,777
Metallurgical recovery of metals from electronic waste: A review
Cui, J., & Zhang, L. (2008) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.001 · Cited by 1,770
Global perspectives on e-waste
Widmer, R., Oswald-Krapf, H., Sinha-Khetriwal, D., Schnellmann, M., & Böni, H. (2005) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2005.04.001 · Cited by 1,709
Mechanical recycling of waste electric and electronic equipment: a review
Cui, J., & Forssberg, E. (2003) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/s0304-3894(03)00061-x · Cited by 1,096
Electronic waste management approaches: An overview
Kiddee, P., Naidu, R., & Wong, M. H. (2013) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.006 · Cited by 906
Aqueous metal recovery techniques from e-scrap: Hydrometallurgy in recycling
Tuncuk, A., Stazi, V., Akcil, A., Yazici, E. Y., & Deveci, H. (2012) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2011.09.019 · Cited by 773
Self-citationSepúlveda, A., Schluep, M., Renaud, F. G., Streicher, M., Kuehr, R., Hagelüken, C., & Gerecke, A. C. (2010) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.04.001 · Cited by 619
Electronic waste recycling: A review of U.S. infrastructure and technology options
Kang, H.-Y., & Schoenung, J. M. (2005) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.06.001 · Cited by 593
Recovery of high purity precious metals from printed circuit boards
Park, Y. J., & Fray, D. J. (2009) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.043 · Cited by 499
Recycle Technology for Recovering Resources and Products from Waste Printed Circuit Boards
Li, J., Lu, H., Guo, J., Xu, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0618245 · Cited by 474
Cited by
Golmohammadzadeh, R., Faraji, F., & Rashchi, F. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.024 · Cited by 478
An exploratory study of e-waste creation and disposal: upstream considerations
Shaikh, S., Thomas, K., & Zuhair, S. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104662 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Akcil, A., Erust, C., Gahan, C. S., Ozgun, M., Sahin, M., & Tuncuk, A.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 45
- Pages
- 258-271
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018525108
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 49.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Precious metal recovery from waste printed circuit boards using cyanide and non-cyanide lixiviants – A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.017
- The paper
- Akcil, A., Erust, C., Gahan, C. S., Ozgun, M., Sahin, M., & Tuncuk, A. (2015). Precious metal recovery from waste printed circuit boards using cyanide and non-cyanide lixiviants – A review. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
